Cases

PER CURIAM: Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Wendalyn Ann Vann in this revocation of supervised release appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Bec

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. Rayvell Vann was caught and convicted of carrying illegal drugs on an Amtrak train in New Mexico. He argues that he did not receive a fair trial because (1) the district court improperly denied his challenge to the government’s discriminatory strike of a potential juror because of the juror’s race; (2) the court improperly allowed expert testimony about

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge SHEDD joined. Judge KING wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the question whether Torrell Vann’s sentence for possessing a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), was properly enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), b

Rehearing en banc granted, January 6, 2011 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 09-4298 TORRELL CHUVALA VANN, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina,

KEENAN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the per curiam opinion of the majority of the members of this Court. I write separately to explain why I conclude that we are permitted to use the “modified categorical approach” in determining whether Vann’s indecent liberties convictions qualify as violent felonies within the meaning of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (the ACCA).

59 F.3d 1241 U.S.v.Vann* NO. 94-41048 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 19, 1995 Appeal From: W.D.La., No. 93-CR-60012 1 AFFIRMED.

30 F.3d 1493 U.S.v.Vann** NO. 94-40175 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 20, 1994 1 Appeal From: W.D.La. 2

Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with supplemental appendix under seal granted.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

673 F.2d 1304 U. S.v.Vann 80-2422 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 11/23/81 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED

649 F.2d 861 U. S.v.Vann 80-2192, 80-2193 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 3/20/81 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED

562 F.2d 50 U. S.v.Vann No. 76-1706 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 6/28/77 1 D.S.C. REVERSED AND REMANDED

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: Before the Civil War, members of the Cherokee Nation had slaves. Those slaves were freed in 1866 pursuant to a treaty negotiated between the United States and the Cherokee Nation. The Treaty guaranteed the former Cherokee slaves and their descendants—known as the Freedmen— “

498 F.2d 1399 U. Sv.Vann 74-1091 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 7/1/74 1 D.S.C. AFFIRMED

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. In January 1999, Plaintiff-Appellant Yaakov M. Vann filed a complaint in the United States District Court against Defendant-Appellees, alleging that the government breached a contract of employment with him in 1993. At an initial scheduling conference in Decembe

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

Judge SULLIVAN delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial at Mannheim and Kaiserslautern, Germany, in May and June of 1997. In accordance with her pleas, she was found guilty of larceny and conduct unbecoming an officer, in violation of Articles 121 and 133, Uniform Code of Military Justice

SCHALL, Circuit Judge. ORDER Edward J. Vann moves for reconsideration of the court’s February 12, 2004 order dismissing his petition for review for failure to file a brief. Vann has since submitted a brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion for reconsideration is granted, the dismissal o