Cases

KANNE, Circuit Judge. This case arises from four kidnapings, one of which resulted in the death of a seventeen-year-old boy who had been abducted, shot and left unattended. All four victims were kidnapped because the kidnappers believed them to owe, or to be related to someone who owed, debts connected with cocaine trafficking. A jury convicted the defendants, Miguel Torres, Salome Varela, Jesus Ruiz and J

Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 78 (BIA 2001) Interim Decision #3449 In re Fernando Alfonso TORRES-VARELA, Respondent File A29 242 698 - Florence Decided May 9, 2001 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Under Arizona law, the offense of aggravated driving under the influence

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Terri Jordan and others seek a writ of mandamus ordering the district court to direct the government to return motorcycles seized in connection with a criminal investigation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 and deny the petition. “A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary or drastic remedy, used only to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jur

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Defendant José Pérez-González appeals his convictions arising from his violent and destructive conduct at the former U.S. Naval base at Vieques, Puerto Rico. We affirm. *43I. We present the facts in the light most favorable to the verdict, see United States v. Boulerice, 325 F.3d 75, 79 (1st Cir.2003), r

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Alonzo Villa appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Villas’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating there are no arguable issues for review and seeking to withdraw as counsel of record. Villa has not filed a pro se

OPINION AND ORDER NORGLE, District Judge. Before the court are Defendants’ Motions to Suppress Post-Arrest Photographic Identifications and Any Tainted Subsequent In-Court Identifications. For the following reasons, their motions are denied. I. BACKGROUND The indictment in this case charges Defendants, Salome Varela (“Varela”), Miguel Torres (“Torres

Appellate Case: 22-2034 Document: 010111001759 Date Filed: 02/16/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 16, 2024

66 F.Supp.2d 274 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Oscar VARELA-CRUZ, Defendant. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Manuel A. Martinez-Talavera; Moises Hernandez-Martinez; Elvin Martinez-Cabrera; Adrian Colon-Aviles, Defendants. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Eddie S. Melendez-Melendez; Hector M. Calderon-Reyes, Defendants. United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jose Arturo Lopez-Lop

PER CURIAM. Litigants must present their appellate arguments in 14,000 words or less, the modern equivalent of the old 50-page standard. Fed. R.App.P. 32(a)(7)(B). When multiple parties with identical interests appear on the same side of an appeal, or of related appeals, we generally enter an order under Circuit Rule 33 requiring them to file a single brief, with a single 14,000

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1519 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HECLOUIS NIEVES-DÍAZ, a/k/a Egloy, a/k/a Eloy, Defendant, Appellant. No. 21-1520 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HECLOUIS JOEL NI

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1114 JESUS RUIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the No

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is defendant Wilfredo Rosario-Camacho's ("Rosario")1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea. (Docket Nos. 4729 and 4911.) Defendant Rosario alleges, inter alia , that this Court participated in plea negotiations contrary to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1) (" Rule 11"). (Docket Nos. 4911 and 4928.) Consequently, defendant

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 21-3092 ________________ LUIS AMAURIS DIAZ ALMANZAR, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ________________ On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigratio

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 21-3092 ________________ LUIS AMAURIS DIAZ ALMANZAR, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STA

ORDER A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court vacate the panel’s opinion and judgment filed February 25,1994, and list the above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the court.

*1102 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Suppress, filed August 7, 2014 (Doc. 675)(“Motion”). The Court held evidentiary hearings on the Motion on January 22, 2015, January 28, 2015, and January 30, 2015. The primary issues are: (i) whether the United State

JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: Jorge Enrique Ponce-Flores pleaded guilty to being unlawfully present in the United States after removal following his conviction for an aggravated felony. On appeal, he contends that the district court plainly erred when it applied an enhancement based on Ponce-Flores's aggregate sentence. We AFFIRM. I. J

OPINION MURPHY, District Judge: A jury convicted Miguel Torralba-Mendia of conspiring to smuggle undocumented immigrants into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I). Torralba appeals his conviction, contending there was insufficient evidence connecting him to the conspiracy. In addition, he argues the district court incorrectly