Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, FLUHR, and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Hiram A. VARGAS Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Handling) Petty Officer Thi

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, ATTANASIO, and GANNON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Kristian J. VARGAS Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps

Case: 21-20140 Document: 00516831915 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Erick VARGAS, Private First Class United States Army, Appellant No. 22-0259 Crim. App. No. 20220168 Argued December 7, 2022—Decided March 14, 2023 Milita

Case: 21-20140 Document: 00516337033 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 31, 2022

Case: 20-40040 Document: 00515956039 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

Case: 20-50029 Document: 00516143779 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/23/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 20-50029 December 23, 2021

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 24, 2022 No. 21-20140 Lyle W. Cayce

Case: 20-50082 Document: 00516166735 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January

19-463-cr United States v. Vargas UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: March 13, 2020 Decided: June 9, 2020 Docket No. 19-463-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

Case: 20-10705 Document: 00516341053 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 2, 2022 No. 20-107

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 16-2141, 16-2142 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. VÍCTOR VARGAS-MARTÍNEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Gustavo A. Gelpí, Jr., U.S. District Judge]

JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge Defendant Leopoldo Vargas-Molina was indicted for unlawful reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He filed two motions to dismiss the indictment, both of which go to the validity of his underlying removal order from 2011. Vargas-Molina relies upon § 1326(d) to collaterally att

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jesus Vargas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vargas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief, the relevant portions of the record reflected there

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando Vargas-Fuentes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vargas-Fuentes has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS MASTROIANNI, District Judge. I. Introduction On March 8, 2014, Detective Brendan Boyle seized from Osvaldo Vargas (“Defendant”) a small “bundle” of heroin, among other items, during a street encounter.1 On May 1, 2014, a grand jury *40

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Vargas-Camacho has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vargas-Camacho has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portio

UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Ruben VARGAS, Staff Sergeant U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant No. 14-6009 Crim. App. No. 201300426 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued September 9, 2014 Decided December 8, 2014 ERDMANN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which STUCK

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. On April 13, 2007, a jury found defendant Caonabo Vargas (“Vargas”) guilty of one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute narcotics, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sections 846, and one count of conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sections 1951. (See Dkt. Minute Entry for 4/13/20

BAKER, Chief Judge (dissenting): The jurisdictional question presented in this ease is whether an order by a military judge curtailing the Government’s case-in-chief, over objection, is subject to review under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2012). Remarkably, the majority concludes that this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear such an interlocutory issue. It reaches this conc