Cases

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 48 Fed. Appx. 106 (first judgment) and 107 (second judgment).

Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 825 (BIA 2020) Interim Decision #3983 Matter of Jonathan Said HERRERA-VASQUEZ, Respondent Decided May 8, 2020 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The absence of a checked alien classification box on a Notice to Appear (Form I-862) does not, by itself, render the notice

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 10, 2013 NO. 03-12-00580-CV Francisco Ivarra, Rebecca Lugo, Juan Villareal, Neal Zabicki, Anahli Vasquez, Willie Galvan, Helen Galvan, and Lee Rivas, Appellants v. American GI Forum of the United States, Inc.; Gilberto Rodriguez; Antonio G. Morales

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00580-CV Francisco Ivarra, Rebecca Lugo, Juan Villareal, Neal Zabicki, Anahli Vasquez, Willie Galvan, Helen Galvan, and Lee Rivas, Appellants v. American GI Forum of the United States, Inc.; Gilberto Rodriguez; Antonio G. Morales and Paul Herrera, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT

MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants, a putative class of over 300 former sailors, appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of their challenges to the Navy’s implementation of an Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) that resulted in their honorable discharges. We affirm. Background In a March 20

544 U.S. 1014 BAEZv.UNITED STATESCASTORENA-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESGONZALEZ-LABORICOv.UNITED STATESGUTIERREZ-GUEVARAv.UNITED STATESHERNANDEZ-GARCIAv.UNITED STATESHERRERA-FLORESv.UNITED STATESIBARRA-ARELLANOv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-GARCIAv.UNITED STATESRAMOS-ZUNIGAv.UNITED STATESRODRIGUEZ-GASPARv.UNITED STATESROJAS-DE-LA ROSAv.

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1013C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 888 F. 3d 150; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 106 Fed. Appx. 618; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 F^d. Appx. 468; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 478; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 120 Fed. Appx. 785;

*1098C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 122; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 360 F. 3d 1339; *1099No. 03-10727. No. 03-10742. No. 03-10752. No. 03-10755. <

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);

540 U.S. 1012 AZANON-RODASv.UNITED STATESMERCADO-VARGAS, AKA BERRONES VARGAS, AKA PEREZv.UNITED STATESMOLINA-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATESNUNEZ-VILLAv.UNITED STATESORTIZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESPACHECO-HERRERAv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-BOVADILLA, AKA CORREA-ESQUIVELv.UNITED STATESSEGURA-CARRERAv.UNITED STATESCISNEROS-PEREZv.UNITED STATESGUARDIOLA-SALAS<

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);

(Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 797); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (54 Fed. Appx. 798); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (54 Fed. Appx. 795); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (54 Fed. Appx. 798); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (54 Fed. Appx. 797). C. A. 5th

538 U.S. 1007 AGUILAR-CASTILLOv.UNITED STATES.DONIS ARREDONDOv.UNITED STATES.BOWEN, AKA JENKINSv.UNITED STATES.DELGADO-LAMASv.UNITED STATES.FLORES-BAUTISTAv.UNITED STATES.FLORES-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATES.GARCIA-PEREZv.UNITED STATES.GARCIA-SANCHEZv.UNITED STATES.HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZv.UNITED STATES.IBANEZ DE LA CRUZ, AKA IBANEZ-DE LA CRUZ, AKA IBA

537 U.S. 1239 MORENO-FLORESv.UNITED STATES;DOMINGUEZ-VILLARREALv.UNITED STATES;HURTADO-HILARIO, AKA HERRERA-GARCIAv.UNITED STATES;IGLESIAS-VASQUEZv.UNITED STATES;ARANDA-PEREZv.UNITED STATES;TAPIA-TIBURCIOv.UNITED STATES;GIRON-NAVAS, AKA RAMIREZ, AKA MARTINEZv.UNITED STATES;MALDONADO-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATES; andVILLAREAL-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATES.

(Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 797); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (54 Fed. Appx. 798); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (54 Fed. Appx. 795); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (54 Fed. Appx. 798); (54 Fed. Appx. 797); (54 Fed. Appx. 797). C. A. 5th

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 54 Fed. Appx. 407 (second, third, and seventh judgments), 408 (first, fourth, fifth, sixth, and ninth judgments), and 409 (eighth judgment).

Case: 19-50855 Document: 00516409077 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/27/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 27, 2022