Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isidro Vasquez-Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Vasquez-Perez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant port

*52 OPINION AND ORDER DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. The United States has requested the Court to revisit the determination of Magistrate Judge Aida M. Delgado Colón granting Defendant bail. The United States Magistrate Judge granted bail conditioned upon the posting of $175,000.00 in cash or secured properties by family members, twenty-four

963 F.2d 385 U.S.v.Vasquez-Perez* NO. 91-5389 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. May 08, 1992 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2

ORDER DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Defendant José A. Vázquez Pérez has requested reconsideration of the Opinion and Order of 29 August 1997 wherein the Court refused to grant bail to the defendant (docket 164). The Court determined that the defendant had failed to rebut the presumption created by law in the instant offense alleging a violation of the Controlled Substances Act under 21 U.S.C. § 80

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1687 19-1750 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NOE SALVADOR PÉREZ-VÁSQUEZ, a/k/a Crazy, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 19-1027 19-1745 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v

OPINION ALARCÓN Circuit Judge: Nicolas Vasquez-Perez was sentenced to serve 21 months for violating the terms of his supervised release by illegally reentering the country after he had been deported. He contends in this appeal that he was not provided with adequate notice of the allegations against him, that his sentence was unreasonable, and that he was

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Lorenzo Perez-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Perez-Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Favio Secundino Vasquez-Perez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion for a continuance and pretermitting his application for canc

570 F.3d 692 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo PEREZ-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-6390. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 10, 2009. Decided and Filed: April 30, 2009.[*] *693 ARGUED: Boyd Walter Venable III, Law Coming, Sevierville, Tenne

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos German Perez-Vasquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al-mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0238p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

543 U.S. 878 BELTRAN-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATES.MENDEZ-MARTINEZv.UNITED STATES.VASQUEZ-CIDv.UNITED STATES. andVILLASENOR-PEREZv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-5013. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 2004. 1 C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1954 SONIA ARACELI PEREZ VASQUEZ; J.S.G.P., Petitioners, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: March 11, 2021

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 43260 STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2017 Opinion No. 38 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: July 3, 2017 ) v. ) Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk ) IDA PEREZ

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alfonso Rodriguez Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Garcia has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, cou

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 43260 STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2017 Opinion No. 38A ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: September 6, 2017 ) v. ) Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;