Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Velasco-Mendez”
United States v. Samuel Gurrolapublic domain
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Samuel Velasco Gurrola ("Gurrola"), the leader of the Velasco Gurrola Criminal Enterprise (the "VCE"), appeals his conviction and sentence for three counts of conspiracy to kill in a foreign country and four counts of conspiracy to cause travel in foreign commerce in the commission of murder-for-hire. Finding no reversible error, we AF
United States v. Osman Reyespublic domain
Case: 16-40241 Document: 00514098373 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 16-40241 FILED
United States v. Fredis Reyes-Contreraspublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge Fredis Reyes-Contreras pleaded guilty of illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a) and (b). Because he had been convicted of manslaughter in Missouri, the court applied the sixteen-level crime-of-violence ("COV") enhancement unde
United States v. Chao Fan Xupublic domain
*972 OPINION GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Four Chinese nationals appeal their convictions and sentences for federal crimes that they committed as part of a scheme to steal funds from the Bank of China, where two of the defendants were high-level employees, and to escape prosecution and
United States v. Mendozapublic domain
MEMORANDUM * The facts and the procedural posture of the case are known to the parties and we do not repeat them here. *620Oscar Mendoza was convicted of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 and now seeks to collaterally attack his deportation, claiming that due process errors and ineffective assistance of counsel deprived him of access to r
United States v. Weilandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-30091 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-03-00070-EFS WILLIAM WEILAND, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court
United States v. William Weilandpublic domain
GOULD, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant William Weiland appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of possessing two firearms and ammunition as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and one count of forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). Weiland argues: 1) that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(b) requires suppression of the firearms and ammunition seized during
344 F.3d 805 Francisco Javier Nativi-Gomez, Petitioner,v.John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.American Immigration Law Foundation; American Immigration Lawyers Association, Minnesota/Dakotas, Iowa/Nebraska, and Missouri/Kansas Chapters, Amici on Behalf of Petitioner. No. 02-3356. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitte
Hernandez v. Florianpublic domain
Hernandez v Florian (2019 NY Slip Op 05111) Hernandez v Florian 2019 NY Slip Op 05111 Decided on June 26, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
New Mexico ex rel. State Eng'r v. Carsonpublic domain
John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tesuque Association, Inc. Scott B. McEl
New Mexic Ex Rel. State Eng'r v. Carsonpublic domain
John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tes
Noor v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered November 22, 2013, after a jury trial, awarding plaintiff damages, modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the award of damages and remanding for a new trial on damages, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff, a welder, was injured when a closed A-frame ladder, which he had leaned against a recently-installed water tank on which he was welding a
Quintero-Salazar v. Keislerpublic domain
Opinion by Judge THOMAS; Dissent by judge KLEINFELD. THOMAS, Circuit Judge: This case presents the question of whether CaLPenal Code § 261.5(d) is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), thus making an alien removable. We conclude that it is not, and grant the petition for review from the contrary decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA
State of New Mexico v. Aamodtpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 9, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Cl
Colón v. Bladespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Chief Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on motion to compel production of documents filed by the defendant and cross-plaintiff, Rubén Blades (“Mr. Blades”), on February 16, 2010, against the defendant, Roberto Morgalo (“Mr. Morgalo”), and plaintiff, William Anthony Colón (“Mr. Colón”). (Docket No. 119.) On February 18, 2010, Mr. Morgalo
Bratton v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Calvin Ray Bratton appeals his convictions for the aggravated robberies of Raymond Velasco (appellate cause number 05-03-01773-CR), Anthony Sirmans (appellate cause number 05-03-01774-CR), and Michael Cox (appellate cause number 05-03-01775-CR). In three issues, Bratton argues the trial court erred in (a) admitting the written statements of two nontestifying accomplices in violation of Bratton's right to confrontation and (b) submitting a jury
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: The BIA correctly dismissed as untimely Mendez-Alearaz’s motion to reconsider. Facts Mendez-Alcaraz, an alien with lawful permanent residence status, pleaded guilty in 1996 to sexual abuse of a minor.1 He was sentenced to 75 months in prison and 120 months of “post-prison supervision.” He spent three years in a juvenile detention fa
Rocio Henriquez-Rivas v. Eric Holder, Jr.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROCIO BRENDA HENRIQUEZ-RIVAS, No. 09-71571 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A098-660-718 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, OPINION Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration App
F. Nativi-Gomez v. John Ashcroftpublic domain
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Francisco Javier Nativi-Gomez appeals the dismissal of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. We affirm. Nativi-Gomez entered the United States in 1984 without inspection. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) took him into custody in 1998 and initiated removal proceedings because he was deportable as an inadm
Lopez-Mendez v. Lexmark International, Inc.public domain
627 F.Supp.2d 66 (2009) Maribel LOPEZ-MENDEZ, Plaintiff, v. LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-1521 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 23, 2009. *67 Harry Anduze-Montano, Jose A. Morales-Boscio, Harry Anduze Montano Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Rosangela 0. Sanf