Cases

Opinion on Suppression Lynn N. Hughes, United States District Judge 1. Introduction. This case illustrates the dilemma of detention and the fiction of freedom. The police in Conroe routinely board intercity buses to survey for law violations. They stop ordinary buses full of ordinary people—just in case. Although passengers and bus drivers may supposedly decline searches, most

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants Eddie Wise and Dorothy Monroe-Wise appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Government in its foreclosure action. We have reviewed the record and find no re*194versible erro

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE, K.M. MCDONALD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DANIEL R. WISE CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 20130

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before R.Q. WARD, J.R. MCFARLANE, J.P. LISIECKI Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TALIK S. WISE LANCE CORPORAL (E-3), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 201300466 SPECIAL COU

597 F.3d 1141 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Charles WISE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-4033. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. March 9, 2010. *1142 Jeremy M. Delicino, Salt Lake City, UT, for Defendant-Appellant. Karin M. Fojtik, Assistant United States Attorney (Brett L. Tolma

588 F.3d 531 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David E. WISE, Appellant. No. 09-1141. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 25, 2009. Filed: December 1, 2009. *534 Paul Joseph D'Agrosa, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Dean R. Hoag, AUSA, St. Louis, MO, for appellee.

556 F.3d 629 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony R. WISE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2794. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued January 8, 2009. Decided February 17, 2009. *630 James E. Crowe, III, Attorney (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Fairview He

Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-12-2008 USA v. Wise Precedential or Non-Precedential:

489 F.Supp.2d 968 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Joseph L. WISE, Defendant. No. CR 07-40001. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division. May 21, 2007. *969 Thomas J. Wright, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sioux Falls, SD, for Plaintiff. Timothy J. Langley, Public Defender's Office, Sioux Fall

515 F.3d 207 (2008) UNITED STATES of America v. Jaycee WISE, Appellant in 06-4926 Edwin Michael Brown, Appellant in 06-4928. Nos. 06-4926, 06-4928. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 3, 2008. Filed: February 12, 2008. *208 *209

PER CURIAM: Defendant-appellant Eric Richard Wise appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence, arguing that the district court erred by refusing to group his counts of conviction pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3D1.2 (2002) [hereinafter U.S.S.G.]. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of conviction and sentence as imposed by the district court. <

Judge BAKER delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant was a private first class (E-3) serving with the 411th Military Police Company in Iraq. On December 16, 2003, he was convicted pursuant to his pleas by a military judge sitting alone of false official statements and wrongful use and distribution of controlled substances on divers occasions, in violation o

418 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2006) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Norman WISE, Jeremy Urban, and Robert Steel Defendants. No. 4:05 CR 170. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. March 2, 2006. *1101 John E. Beamer, Lester A. Paff, U.S. Attorney's Office, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff. William H. Habhab,

MEMORANDUM ** Rose Marie Wise appeals from the district court’s revocation of her supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. *987Wise contends that the district court abused its discretion in revoking her supervised release because there was insufficient evidence to support the conclus

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant’s sentence be affirmed. The district court committed no error in denying appellant a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, as appellant could have pled to the indictment

OPINION PER CURIAM. Defendant-Appellant Timothy S. Wise (“Defendant”) was convicted of three counts of aiding and abetting armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a)(d) and 2, and use of a firearm in connection with a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1) and 2. He appeals his conviction and sentence, raising the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in deny

LITTLE, District Judge: Defendants-appellants Johnie Wise (“Wise”) and Jack Abbott Grebe, Jr. (“Grebe”) appeal the judgment of criminal conviction entered on 5 February 1999, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Brownsville Division. Appellants argue that a number of errors occurred with regard to the trial, as a result of which this Court shou

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Joseph Marks Wise challenges his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Because Wise pleaded guilty and failed to reserve the right to appeal the district court’s pretrial rulings, we affirm Wise’s conviction. I. Pursuant to two separate search warrants, police i

OPINION KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Wise Ukomadu was convicted of possession with intent to distribute heroin. Defendant brings this direct appeal alleging (1) that the district court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, (2) that the district court abused its discretion in ordering that defendant pay fines, and (3) that the dis

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 24-2460 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RANDAL WISE, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Distr