Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Warnock”
United States v. Warnockpublic domain
ISKRA, Judge, dissenting: I concur in affirming the conviction of adultery (Specification 1 of the Charge) and in that portion of the majority opinion which concludes that the military judge’s conduct did not prejudice the appellant. I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which holds that the evidence to Specification 2 of the Charge is legally insufficient to prove prejudice to good order and
Zhao v. Warnockpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Warnock v. Archerpublic domain
397 F.3d 1024 Steve WARNOCK, Appellant,v.Charles ARCHER, Individually and as Superintendent; Charles Eads, Individually and as Principal; Gene Baldwin, Individually and as School Board President; David Smith, Individually and as member of the Board of Directors of the Devalls Bluff, Arkansas Public School District; L.C. Holloway, Individually and as member of the Board of Directors of the Devalls Bluff, Arkansas Public School District; Vern
Warnock v. Archerpublic domain
380 F.3d 1076 Steve WARNOCK, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,v.Charles ARCHER, Individually and as Superintendent; Charles Eads, Individually and as Principal; Gene Baldwin, Individually and as School BoardPresident; David Smith, Individually and as member of the Board of Directors of the Devalls Bluff, Arkansas Public School District; L.C. Holloway, Individually and as member of the Board of Directors of the Devalls Bluff, Arkansas Public Sch
Steve Warnock v. Charles Archerpublic domain
*1079 MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Steve Warnock brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging various practices of the Devalls Bluff School District on establishment clause grounds. Mr. Warnock, though partially successful below, appeals on the ground that the relief granted to him
Steve Warnock v. Charles Archerpublic domain
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Our opinion on the merits in this case is Warnock v. Archer, 380 F.3d 1076 (8th Cir.2004). Steve Warnock has moved for attorney’s fees and what he refers to as *1026 “costs” on appeal from the defendants, and the
Haughn v. Warnock (In re Warnock)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge. This cause comes before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant Mony Securities Corp. (hereafter “Mony Securities”), Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition, and Mony Securities’ Response. This Court has reviewed the arguments of counsel, exhibits, as well as the entire record in the case. Based upon that review
State v. Warnockpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Warnock, 2024-Ohio-382.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO MADISON COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2023-02-001 : OPINION - vs -
State v. Warnockpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Warnock, 2018-Ohio-4481.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : CASE NO. CA2018-01-016 : OPINION - vs -
Warnock v. Warnockpublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Warnock v. Warnockpublic domain
988 S.W.2d 7 (1999) 336 Ark. 506 J. Stephen WARNOCK, Appellant, v. Ann WARNOCK (Laser), Appellee. No. 98-698. Supreme Court of Arkansas. March 4, 1999. T. David Carruth, Clarendon, for appellant. Gilbert Law Firm, by: Melinda R. Gilbert, North Little Rock, for appellee. RAY THORNTON, Justice. This is an appeal from the Pu
Fcn, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION HORN, J. The protestor, FCN, Inc. (FCN), filed a post-award bid protest in this court challenging the Ar National Guard’s award of a contract for a “Mass Notification System/Net-Centric Aerting System” (Mass Notification System) to Reliable Government *339 Solutions,
Warnock v. Archerpublic domain
443 F.3d 954 Steve WARNOCK, Appellee/Cross Appellant,v.Charles ARCHER, Individually and as Superintendent; Charles Eads, Individually and as Principal; Gene Baldwin, Individually and as School Board President; David Smith, Individually and as member of the Board of Directors of the DeValls Bluff, Arkansas Public School District and the DeValls Bluff Public School District; L.C. Holloway, Individually and as member of the Board of Directors
Business Integra, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER 1 LETTOW, Judge. This post-award bid protest concerns a procurement by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS” or “the government”) of information technology (“IT”) services. In issuing the pertinent solicitation, DHS sought propos
Lyon Shipyard, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge: In this post-award bid protest action, Lyon Shipyard, Inc. (Lyon), of Norfolk, Virginia, challenges the Navy’s decision to award a contract for marine boatyard services to Marine Hydraulics International (MHI). It claims that the Navy did not conduct meaningful discussions and failed to treat all offerors equally. The parties have fi
In Re Warnockpublic domain
323 B.R. 249 (2005) In re Deborah Kaye WARNOCK, Debtor. No. 2:04-BK-74191. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, Ft. Smith Division. April 5, 2005. *250 Eric Soller, for the debtor. R. Ray Fulmer, Ledbetter, Cogbill, Arnold & Harrison, LLP, Fort Smith, AR, Chapter 7 Trustee. Kenneth W. Cowan, for River Town Fed
American Auto Logistics, Lp v. United Statespublic domain
United States Transportation Command; Past Performance Evaluation; Performance Price Tradeoff; Commercial Marketplace; Global Privately-Owned Vehicle Contract. OPINION HORN, J. Protestor, American Auto Logistics, LP, filed a post-award bid protest on February 5, 2014, challenging the award by the United States Transportation Command
218 B.R. 722 (1997) In re FIRST INTERREGIONAL ADVISORS CORPORATION, Debtor. WARNOCK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Harrison J. GOLDIN, Chapter 11 Trustee for First Interregional Advisors Corp.; First Interregional Advisors Corp.; Township of Mt. Laurel; School District of the Chathams; Borough of North Catasauqua; Township of Wilkes-Barre; and John Does X, Y, and Z, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 97-22513, Adversary N
Colonial Press International, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiff, Colonial Press International, Inc. (Colonial Press), filed a post-award bid protest in this court, challenging the United States Government Printing Office (GPO) award of a contract under a United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) initiative known as Program 199-S to Fry Communications, Inc. (Fry Communications).2 Plaintiff allege
Steve Warnock v. Charles Archerpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The DeValls Bluff School District, along with its employees and directors, are subject to an injunction that prohibits them from orchestrating or supervising prayers at school graduation or baccalaureate ceremonies. They appeal the order of the district court 1 holding them in contempt of that injunction. Ste