Cases

932 F.2d 965 U.S.v.Whitis* NO. 90-4790 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. APR 25, 1991 1 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. 2

911 F.2d 727 U.S.v.Whitis* NO. 89-6257 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JUL 30, 1990 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. VACATED.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

368 F.Supp. 822 (1974) Steve WHITIS and Alan K. Fout, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants. No. 73-417-Civ-T-H. United States District Court, M. D. Florida, Tampa Division. January 10, 1974. *823 Gerald R. Herms, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiffs. D

368 F.Supp. 821 (1973) Steve WHITIS and Alan K. Fout, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants. No. 73-417-Civ-T-H. United States District Court, M. D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 4, 1973. Gerald R. Herms, Tampa, Fla., for plaintiffs. D. Frank Winkles, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tampa

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Trooper Brad Ramsey pulled over a car after discovering that its registered owner had an outstanding arrest warrant. He and *424 other officers found marijuana, methamphetamine, a firearm, and three passengers-but not the owner. The district court denied a motion b

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES 0F AMERICA, ) ) ) ) v ) CRIMINAL NO. 07-278-05 (RJL) ) ) OSCAR HURTADO CAMPAZ, ) , F¢LED Defendant. g ApR 1 5 2009 NANCY MAYER WHITI|NGTON, CLERK U.S. D|STR|CT COURT MEMORANDUM & ORDER Oscar Hurtado Campaz has been charged with conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 959 and 960. Now before the Court is the government’s oral motion for pre-trial detention. This Cou

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0181p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X

HIRAM CHURCH FORD, Senior District Judge. By this action, the Plaintiff Alonzo Whitis invokes the jurisdiction of the Court under Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 405(g)) to review the decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, by which, upon consideration of the evidence presented, it was held that in the light of the entire evidence of the record the claimant, Alonzo Whit

SUTTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOGGS, C.J., BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, ROGERS, COOK, and McKEAGUE, JJ., joined, and in which GRIFFIN, J., joined except with respect to Sections IV.A.2., V., and VI. CLAY (p. 196) and GRIFFIN (pp. 196-202), JJ., delivered separate opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. Judge CLAY joins Judge Griffin’s opinion except with respect to Section II. of the opinion, and joins Section IV. of Judg

Ogden, J. This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant, in 1867, to recover the price or value of a certain lot of cotton delivered to appellant in the early part of the year 1864, to be taken to market, to be sold by appellant. The cause was submitted to a jury in the' District Court, and a judgment rendered for the plaintiff below, and the defendant has brought the case to this court by an appeal.

The court delivered a PER CURIAM opinion. SUTTON, J. (pp. 407-12), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. AMENDED OPINION PER CURIAM. This matter is before the Court on the government’s petition for rehearing en banc. Upon consideration of the relevant briefs and the record, we vacate our prior opinion,

RYAN, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Danny Stone, Jr., appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed following his trial for aiding and abetting the escape of a federal prisoner, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 752. He argues that the district court: (1) abused its discretion when admitting testimony of Stone’s mother, Cathy Adams; and (2) erred in calculating his base offense level under the sentencing guidelines. We will aff

Affirming. The appellants, Earl Whitis and Mrs. Cora Colyer, were with Jim Ping, Elwyn Jackson, and Louisa Price, jointly indicted by the grand jury of Laurel county for the crime of robbery "by the use and display of offensive deadly weapons, to-wit, pistols." Chapter 52, Acts of 1934, now section 1159a, Baldwin's 1936 Revision of Carroll's Kentucky Statutes, provides that: "If any person shall commit acts of robbery, * * * as defined in Sections 1159 or 11

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted defendant/appellant Rattan Lai Aggarwal of one count of conspiracy and four counts of wire fraud in connection with his participation in a fraudulent loan scheme. Aggarwal appeals on several grounds. Finding no basis for reversal, we AFFIRM Aggarwal’s conviction and sentence. Aggarwal raises seven points of error,

Justice Stevens, with whom Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice O’Connor join, dissenting. The relationship between a court and the members of its bar is not defined by statute alone. The duties of the practitioner are an amalgam of tradition, respect for the profession, the inherent power of the judiciary, and the commands that are set forth in canons of ethics, rules of co

386 F.Supp. 926 (1969) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Cassius Marsellus CLAY, Jr., a/k/a Muhammad Ali, Defendant. Cr. No. 67-H-94. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. July 14, 1969. *927 Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., John S. Martin, Jr. and Michael T. Epstein, Attys., Dept. of

45 F.3d 430NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Ira Ray CLARK, Petitioner-Appellant,v.KARST-ROBBINS COAL CO., Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., andDirector, OWCP, United States Department of Labor,Respondents-Appellees.

AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge. This Selective Service case involves the conviction by a"jury on June 20, 1967 of Cassius Marsellus Clay, Jr., also known as Muhammad Ali, former professional heavyweight boxing champion of the world, for wilfully refusing to be inducted into the Armed Forces of the United States, in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462, and is before us for the second tim

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, directing the United States to pay fees and expenses of counsel appointed by the court to represent a prisoner in connection with proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The opinion of the district court, Dillon v.