Cases

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Appellant Pedro Antonio Flores Rodriguez petitioned for the return of his child, A.S.F.S., under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction and the -International Child Abduction Remedies Act. The district court denied Flores’s petition. Flores now appeals, and we REVERSE in part, VACATE in part, and REMAND f

350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position

*1001(Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 914); *1002(82 Fed. Appx. 920); (82 Fed. Appx. 881); (84 Fed. Appx. 388); (82 Fed. Appx. 955); (82 Fed. Appx. 903); (82 Fed. Appx. 954); (82 Fed. Appx. 930); (83 Fed. Appx

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

*1001(Reported below: 82 Fed. Appx. 914); *1002(82 Fed. Appx. 920); (82 Fed. Appx. 881); (84 Fed. Appx. 388); (82 Fed. Appx. 955); (82 Fed. Appx. 903); (82 Fed. Appx. 954); (82 Fed. Appx. 930); (83 Fed. Appx

539 U.S. 953 Garza-Hernandezv.United States.Perez-Huertav.United StatesZapata-Martinezv.United StatesSolis-Brionesv.United StatesCarbajal-Taglev.United StatesMartinez-Rodriguezv.United StatesSalinas-Rodriguezv.United StatesCortes-Gallegosv.United StatesMendoza-Martinezv.United StatesHernandez-Hernandezv.United StatesGonzalez-Medra

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

(Reported below: 273 F. 3d 1102); C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Case: 22-30656 Document: 298-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-30656 FILED ____________

Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Juan Carlos Ramirez-Ortiz was charged with violating Title 8, United States Code, Section 1325(a)(2). (ECF No. 1 "Compl."; ECF No. 16). The Government alleged that on January 2, 2019, a Border Patrol Agent intercepted Mr. Ramirez-Ortiz and two other individuals in a remote area of Copper Canyon, located approximately three

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION Robert E. Wier, United States Magistrate Judge Movant, Adrian Campbell, is a federal inmate. DE # 131 (Motion), at 1. On May 18, 2016,1 Campbell filed a pro se2 motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as well as a memorandum of law. See id.; DE # 131-1. The United States responded in opposition. DE # 139 (Response).

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3532 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-00202- TWR-1 v. HIGINIO ALEJANDRO OPINION GONZALEZ-REYES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States D

FORTUNATO P. BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: Calvin Louis Smith (“Defendant”) appeals his jury trial conviction for soliciting or accepting a bribe in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B). Defendant served as an alderman for the City of Canton, Mississippi, and the jury found that he agreed to accept several thousand dollars in exchange for influencing the award of a city ditch-sprayin

PER CURIAM: Tomas Puga-Yanez (“Puga-Yanez”) appeals his sentence. Puga-Yanez contends that the district court committed reversible error by applying a sixteen-level sentencing enhancement based on his prior conviction of child molestation. For the *319 reasons that follow, we AFFIRM Puga-Yanez’s sen

678 F.3d 1164 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Emmanuel HUITRON-GUIZAR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-8051. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 7, 2012. *1165 Ronald Pretty, Cheyenne, WY, for Defendant-Appellant. Todd Shugart, Assistant United States Attorney, (and Christopher A. Crofts,

REVISED December 27, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 09-10560 December 7, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce

KING, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated case, we address the appeals of five individuals and one corporate defendant convicted of conspiracy and substantive offenses for providing material aid and support to a designated terrorist organization. The terrorist organization at issue is Hamas, which in 1995 was named a Specially Designated Terrorist by Presidential Executive Order