Cases

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

BERZON, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents a set of thorny procedural and substantive questions implicating several areas of constitutional and immigration law. These questions include: the scope of some of the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA)1; the bounda

373 F.3d 952 KWAI FUN WONG; Wu-Wei Tien Tao Association, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES of America, Immigration and Naturalization Service, being sued as David V. Beebe, Jerry F. Garcia, Jack O'Brien, Douglas Glover and John Doe INS Officials; United States of America, Defendants-Appellants. No. 02-35727. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued an

622 F.3d 341 (2010) Eudulio DE LEON-OCHOA, a/k/a Roger Reyes-Oliva, a/k/a Roger Armando Reyes-Bolivar, a/k/a Roger Armando Reyes-Oliva, Petitioner No. 09-1520 v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Respondent. Eufemia Flores-Dominguez; Arely Magdalena Rivera-Flores; Elida Yamilet Rivera-Flores, Petitioners No. 09-1760 v. Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. R.E. L-P-, Petitioner No. 09-1960 v. Attorney Gen

24 F.3d 250NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Maria Luisa JIMENEZ, aka Maria Rumbo-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50506.

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Jonathan Jaciel Zazueta, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the decision of an immigration judge (IJ) finding him removable under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 - 1537. Having jurisdicti

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1074 ___________________________ Jonathan Jaciel Zazueta lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States

Opinion by Judge B. FLETCHER; Concurrence by Judge N.R. Smith. OPINION B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Salar Khoshfahm (“Khoshfahm”) seeks review of a March 8, 2010 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) finding of removability and denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. The BIA affirmed the IJ’s

Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court. An immigration statute, 8 U. S. C. § 1229b(a), authorizes the Attorney General to cancel the removal of an alien from the United States so long as the alien satisfies certain criteria. One of those criteria relates to the length of time an alien has lawfully resided in the United States, and another to the len

Cite as 26 I&N Dec. 123 (BIA 2013) Interim Decision #3781 Matter of Diana MONTOYA-SILVA, Respondent Decided May 9, 2013 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A parent’s lawful permanent resident status and residence in the United States cannot be imputed to an unemancipated minor for purp

OPINION PONSOR, Senior District Judge: In Holder v. Martinez Gutierrez, 566 U.S. 583, 132 S.Ct. 2011, 182 L.Ed.2d 922 (2012), the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) permissibly construed section 240A(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a), when it concluded that an alie

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. The case of Yubelkys Aponte is before this court for a second time. This go-around she petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals *8 (BIA) denying her request for a remand and dismissing her appeal from a final order of removal. Finding once again tha

MEMORANDUM ** We address three related and consolidated petitions for review. Petitioner Rosalia Lopez De Reyes petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her application for cancellation of removal (No. 02-71480), the BIA’s first denial of De Reyes’s motion to reopen (No. 02-72337), and the BIA’s deni*484al of De Re

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Concepcion Padilla-Caldera petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying his request to adjust his status to that of lawful permanent resident and ordering him removed. This is the second time this case has come before us. On a previous petition for review, we held that the BIA erred in concluding that petitioner wa

674 F.3d 1128 (2012) COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION; Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by any Means Necessary, (BAMN); Defend Affirmative Action Party, (DAAP); Issamar Camacho; Jeremy Bamidele; Maria Belman; Jonathan Brooks; Christian Ivan Burgos; Mayra Casillas; Bianca Centeno; Calvin Jevon Cochran; Adan De La Cruz, by his next friend Luis De La Cruz; Omar Serag Eldin, by his next friend Gamil Serag Eldin; Jose Flores; Mich

Cite as 25 I&N Dec. 296 (BIA 2010) Interim Decision #3689 Matter of David REZA-Murillo, Respondent File A070 794 179 - El Paso, Texas Decided July 30, 2010 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A grant of Family Unity Program benefits does not constitute an “admi

649 F.3d 942 (2011) Francisco Javier GARFIAS-RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-72603. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 8, 2010. Filed April 11, 2011. *943 Soren M. Rottman, Esq., Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Granger

SELYA, Circuit Judge. In this case, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denied the petitioner’s alternative application for asylum or withholding of removal, but granted a time-limited privilege of voluntary departure (now seemingly expired). The first, and easier, question is whether substantial evidence in the record supports the BIA’s decision on the merits. The second, an

BERZON, Circuit Judge. How long is a year? We are not the first to confront this question. See, e.g., British Calendar Act, 1751, 24 Geo. 2 c. 23 (Eng.) (adopting the Gregorian calendar); Pope Gregory XIII, Inter Gravissimas (1582), reprinted in VIII Bullarum Diplo-MATUM ET PrIVILEGIORuM SANCTORUM RoMAN-Pontifioum 386