Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United Syst of AR v. Moore Bus Forms Inc”
Crone, Judge. Case Summary [1] Kenworth of Indianapolis, Inc., et al. (collectively "the Defendants"), 1 manufactured and sold to Seventy-Seven Limited, et al. (collectively "the Plaintiffs"), 2 a fleet
United States v. Seefriedpublic domain
Classification/Desc Year Corpus Source or Source Type Excerpt of Concordance Line Contextual summary ription As we said in both Benoit and Ros
United States v. Seefriedpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNTER SEEFRIED, Case No. 21-cr-287 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Did the electoral certification on January 6, 2021 involve the “administration of justice”? The answer determines whether significant sentencing enh
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 5514413 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge This case presents an issue of first impression regarding the United States Coast Guard’s statutory authority to impose • non-financial conditions for the release of a foreign-flagged vessel that the agency has detained at a United States port due to suspected violations o
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WATERVALE MARINE CO., LTD., as ) owner of the M/V AGIOS EMILIANOS, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-cv-0105 (KBJ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
Key Government Finance, Inc. v. E3 Enterprises Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for review in this breach of contract case is the motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and prejudgment interest filed by Plaintiff Key Government Finance, Inc. (“KGF” or “Key”) against Meridian Imaging Solutions, Inc. (“Meridian”). (ECF Nos. 32, 36, 37). The issues have been fully briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing
Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc.public domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS William H., Orrick, United States District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs allege that the panoramic sunroofs installed in the Nissan vehicles they purchased spontaneously explode and that Nissan refuses to repair, replace, or otherwise compensate plaintiffs with respect to these explosions. They assert a host of claims on
3e Mobile, LLC v. Global Cellular, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) 3E MOBILE, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff and Counter Defendant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 14-cv-1975 (GMH) ) GLOBAL CELLULAR, INC. )
Select Building Systems, Inc. and Tri-Bar Ranch Company, Ltd. v. Robertson Electric, Inc.public domain
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
ACCEPTED 05-15-00369-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/8/2015 6:10:20 PM
in Re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.public domain
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE
Nordwall v. PHC-LAS Cruces, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant PHC-Las Cruces, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Claim Under the Rehabilitation Act and Memorandum in Support, filed September 20, 2012 (Doc. 41)(“Motion for Summary Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on November 28, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) wheth
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Defendants, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., Caliber Home Loans, Inc., and HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. have filed motions to dismiss Jose and Teresa Trevino’s complaint for failure- to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Case No. 13-07031; ECF Nos. 79 and 80). The motions are granted in part and denied in part. The' follow
MEMORANDUM OPINION Marvin Isgur, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Defendants, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., Caliber Home Loans, Inc., and HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. have filed motions to dismiss Jose and Teresa Trevino’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Case No. 13-07031; ECF Nos. 79 and 80). The motions are granted in part and denied in part. The following claims
Verizon West Virginia, Inc. v. West Virginia Bureau of Employment Programs, Workers' Compensation Divisionpublic domain
DAVIS, Justice, dissenting: (Filed July 9, 2003) In this proceeding three employers, who are self-insured for workers’ compensation purposes, appealed an order of the circuit court obligating them to share the burden of retiring a six billion dollar debt1 that was caused by the State’s failure to maintain a Second Injury Reserve Fund from 1947 to 1997. The major
In re Circuit City Stores, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed
617 F.3d 1127 (2010) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NETWORK SERVICES DEPOT, INC.; Network Marketing LLC; Network Services Distribution, Inc.; Charles V. Castro; Elizabeth L. Castro; Gregory High; Sunbelt Marketing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Phyllis Watson, Relief Defendant. No. 09-15684. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Subm
622 F.Supp.2d 1357 (2009) The CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. KW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC d/b/a KW Property Management and Consulting, LLC; KW Holding One, LLC d/b/a KW Property Management and Consulting, LLC; the Grand Preserve at Naples LLC d/b/a KW Property Management and Consulting, LLC; and Marcy Kravit, Defendants. Case No. 09-60202-CV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida.</
MEMORANDUM TO ORDER OF MARCH 29, 2013, GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ABSTENTION AND REMAND GREGORY F. KISHEL, Chief Judge. On March 29, 2013 this court entered an order granting the Plaintiffs’ motion for abstention and remand. Via that order, certain of the requests for relief in this lawsuit .-were returned to the Minnesota State District Court for the Sixth Judicial District, St. Louis County, the jud