⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United Transportation Union v. Laredo Transit Management, Inc.”

District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988-03-21 · Published · cited 7× · 694 F. Supp. 417; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15330; 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,780; 1988 WL 90153
694 F.Supp. 417 (1988) Mario MINEO v. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT OF TENNESSEE, INC., et al. No. 3-86-0106. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. March 21, 1988. *418 John W. Beasley, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff. Earl W. Roberts, Legal Dept. of Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Nashville,
District Court, D. Nevada · 2004-03-11 · Published · cited 4× · 310 F. Supp. 2d 1168; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5179; 2004 WL 614814
310 F.Supp.2d 1168 (2004) SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (USDOT); Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta; Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); Administrator of FHWA Mary Peters; Division Administrator of FHWA Nevada Division, John Price, Defendants. No. CV-S-02-0578-PMP RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. March 11, 2004.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-12-01 · Published · cited 1× · 87 F.4th 616
Case: 23-50632 Document: 00516986695 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/01/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED December 1, 202
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00880-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/25/2015 3:28:27 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, NO. CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TE
District Court, District of Columbia · 1983-04-20 · Published · cited 74× · 569 F. Supp. 990; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17551
569 F.Supp. 990 (1983) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., and American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-0192. Misc. No. 82-0025 (PI). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 20, 1983.<
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006-05-05 · Published · cited 52× · 448 F.3d 760; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11359; 2006 WL 1195324
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of an accident during the construction of the Petronius oil and gas production facility in the Gulf of Mexico. Addressing multiple issues raised in two actions consolidated for trial and appeal, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. With respect to the products liability action arising from the loss of a portion of the Petro-nius compliant tower, w
United States Court of International Trade · 2012-11-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2012 CIT 134; 880 F. Supp. 2d 1335; 2012 WL 5441563; 34 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2161; 2012 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 136
OPINION and ORDER GORDON, Judge: This opinion follows a bench trial. Plaintiff United States (the “Government”) brought this action pursuant to Section 553 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1553 (2006) 1 ; and 19 C.F.R. § 18.8(c), to recover certain duties, taxes, and fees fr
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003-06-24 · Published · cited 33× · 333 F.3d 628; 172 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2801; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12819
333 F.3d 628 BROWN & ROOT, INC., Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner. No. 01-60635. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 24, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Howard S. Linzy (argued), Robert Peter Lombardi, The Kullman Firm, New Orleans, LA, for Brown &
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995-11-26 · Published · cited 14× · 910 F. Supp. 1399; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18171; 71 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 387; 1995 WL 701690
910 F.Supp. 1399 (1995) Nelson S. JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. C 93-3069. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. November 26, 1995. *1400 *1401 *1402 *1403
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00049-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/4/2015 4:39:01 PM KEITH HOTTLE
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-04-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 5038192 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 1999-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-98-00166-CV Summit Machine Tool Manufacturing Corp., Appellant v. Great Northern Insurance Com
District Court, E.D. Texas · 1981-07-30 · Published · cited 24× · 523 F. Supp. 703; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9803
ORDER JUSTICE, Chief Judge. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Proceedings in the above-captioned civil action have been carried out within the ambit of a statewide desegregation suit instituted by the United States in this court on March 6, 1970. Leave to intervene, sought by the G. I. Forum and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LU-LAC), was granted on July 10,1972, permitting those pa
District Court, E.D. Texas · 1981-07-30 · Published · cited 17× · 523 F. Supp. 703
523 F.Supp. 703 (1981) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, LULAC and G.I. Forum, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 5281. United States District Court, E. D. Texas, Tyler Division. July 30, 1981. *704 *705 *706
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954-04-15 · Published · cited 116× · 212 F.2d 147; 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4302
RIVES, Circuit Judge. The questions to be decided are whether a third party complaint was properly served on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, whether the district court acquired jurisdiction of that company, and whether the venue was properly laid. The original action was brought in the district cour
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996-06-27 · Published · cited 26× · 87 F.3d 1512; 1997 A.M.C. 140; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16295
87 F.3d 1512 Jerry B. HODGEN and Bobby Sue Hodgen, Plaintiffs,v.FOREST OIL CORP., et al., Defendants,FOREST OIL CORP. and Ronald J. Doucet, Defendants-ThirdParty Plaintiffs-Intervenor Defendants-Cross ClaimPlaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,FOREST OIL CORP., in its capacity as platform owner andRonald J. Doucet, Defendants-Third PartyPlaintiffs-Intervenor Defendants-CrossClaimPlaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Ap