Cases

R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 87. For the reasons discussed herein, this motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background of the Underlying Action. Th

*812 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Plaintiffs Luv N’ Care, Ltd. and Admar International, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) (Dkt. No. 75, filed on May 14, 2015), the response of Defendants Jackel International Limited and Mayborn USA, Inc. (“Defendants”)

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DANIEL FELDMAN, JONATHAN ) WYATT GRUBER, JOHN CHARLES ) POPE REVOCABLE TRUST and ) TIERNEY FAMILY INVESTORS, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0314-PAF

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. In this action brought by two private individuals under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, and various state analogues, we review de novo the dismissal of a complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). Applying and extending our holding in United States ex rel. D’Agostino v. ev3, Inc., 845 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016), we affir

MEMORANDUM OPINION . HONORABLE LEONARD P. STARK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC (“MTel”) alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,590,403 (“the ’403. patent”);. 5,915,210 (“the ’210 patent”); and 5,659,891 (“the ’891 patent,” and collectively with the ’403 and ’210 patents, the “asr serted patents”). The .asserted patents relate to a wireless messaging network.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER KIMBA W. WOOD, United States District Judge This is an interpleader action brought by Plaintiff XL Specialty Insurance Company (“XL”) to resolve competing claims to the remaining $1,372,596.10 (the “Inter-pleaded Funds”) of a $3 million financial services liability’policy (the “Policy”) purchased by non-party Capital L Group, LLC (“Capital L”), which provided insurance for C

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) BCI Construction USA, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 62657, 62975, 63200 ) Under Contract No. W912DQ-17-C-1070 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Ron Garber, Esq. Weissman Zucker Euster Morochnik

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, United States District Judge L INTRODUCTION In this action, Plaintiff Michael A. Grani-ca alleges that his employer, .Defendant Town of Hamburg (“the Town”), discriminated and retaliated against him based on age and disability in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., and the Americans with Disabiliti

ACCEPTED 04-15-00474-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7/28/2015 4:51:49 PM

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This case, originally brought against 23 defendants where the eight above-captioned now remain, comes before the court on motions premised on Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure separately filed March 10, 2015, on behalf of defen*784dants J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. (“JMM”) (DE 151) and Form

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND... 255 II. PRINCIPLES OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION. . .256 III. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION.. .257 A. The Pulnev Patents .. .257 1. “thread” and “threads” .. .261 2. “elongate

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge This is a qui tarn action alleging the submission of false claims to government health-care programs for a defective hip-replacement device. Relators Dr. Antoni Nargol and Dr. David Langton, who are expert witnesses in a related products-liability case involving the same device, have brought suit against d

OPINION Holly Kirby delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Sharon G. Lee, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Gary R. Wade, and Jeffrey S. Bivins, JJ,, joined. Petitioner Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) brought this action to' set aside a tax sale of real property. MERS argues that t

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' i'HIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, filed July 27, 2016 (Doc. 594)(“Renewed Motion for Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on December 1, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether specific factual findings the jury made that Defendant Larry A. Gold-stone and Defend

ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support [Docket No. 330] filed by defendant JBS USA,'LLC (“JBS”). This'Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1345. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out a conflict between JBS and several hundred Musli

JOHN ANTOON II, United States District Judge On January 4, 2013, a 1957 Beechcraft Bonanza H35 airplane, U.S. registry N375B ("N375B"), crashed while approaching Runway 29 at the Flagler County Airport in northeast Florida for an *1301emergency landing. At the time, N375B was owned and piloted by Michael Anders. Also on board were two passe

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge The Court presided over a 16-day trial to court in Phase I of this discrimination case, involving pattern or practice claims brought by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC") pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Defendant, JBS USA, LLC, d/b/a JBS Swift & Company ("JBS"), owns a beef processing facility in Greeley, Colorado (the "Gre

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL V. *FILED UNDER SEAL* THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN unsealed October 3, 2022

City of Roseville v. Textron R.I. CV-09-367 8/23/11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Case No. 09-cv-00367-PB Opinion No. 2011 DNH 223 Textron, Inc. et a l . MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This is a securities fraud class action in which the plaintiffs claim that Text

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND AMENDED ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of PCAOB Deposition Transcripts and Plaintiffs Notes and Memoranda of Interviews with Non-Party Witnesses, filed November 28, 2012 (Doc. 90) (“Motion to Compel”);2 (ii) Non-Party KPMG L