⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Urgent v. United States Marshals Service”

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016-10-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA15-1197 Filed: 18 October 2016 Wake County, No. 14 CVS 635 ABRONS FAMILY PRACTICE AND URGENT CARE, PA; NASH OB-GYN ASSOCIATES, PA; HIGHLAND OBSTETRICAL-GYNECOLOGICAL CLINIC, PA; CHILDREN’S HEALTH OF CAROLINA, PA; CAPITAL NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES, PA; HICKORY ALLERGY & ASTHMA CLINIC, PA; HALIFAX MEDICAL SPECIALISTS, PA; and WESTSIDE OB-GYN CENTER, PA; Individually and on B
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2000-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
Continuation of Federal Prisoner Detention Efforts During United States Marshals Service Appropriation Deficiency It is doubtful that the “ authorized by law ” exception to the A ntideficiency A ct would allow the U nited States M arshals Service to continue to provide prisoner detention-related functions during a deficiency in its Federal Prisoner Detention budget, but it is likely that the “ em ergency” excep­ tions set forth in § 1342 and § 1515 o f that statute would app
Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel · 2024-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
(Slip Opinion) Whether the United States Postal Service Bears Responsibility for the Cost of Certain Civil Service Retirement Benefits Paid to Its Employees The United States Postal Service is responsible for the full cost of retirement benefits owed to its employees under the Civil Service Retirement System attributable to pay increases that USPS granted on and after the date it was established, including with respect to increases in benefits accrued during thos
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-03-19 · Published · cited 0× · 930 F. Supp. 2d 198; 2013 WL 1111285; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37349
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Plaintiff Sierra Club filed suit under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., against Defendants the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Director Dan Ashe in his official capacity, the Department of Interior, and Secretary Kenneth Salazar, also in his
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-07-09 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 23-4074 Document: 123-1 Date Filed: 07/09/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 9, 2025
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CO-0938 FRANK L. BAILEY, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025-01-15 · Published · cited 3× · 126 F.4th 46
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1052 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DARIO GIAMBRO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge] Befor
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims GOVCIO, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Nos. 25-cv-809, 25-cv-913 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, Filed Under Seal: August 9, 20251 and Publication: August 18, 2025 IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, LLC, Intervenor-Defendant. Ja
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-0598 (PLF) ) TERENCE SUTTON ) and ) ANDREW ZABAVSKY, )
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021-12-08 · Published · cited 37× · 20 F.4th 558
Appellate Case: 18-1366 Document: 010110616083 Date Filed: 12/08/2021 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 8, 2021
North Carolina Business Court · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 NCBC 60
Abrons Family Practice & Urgent Care v. N.C. Dep’t Health & Human Servs., 2015 NCBC 60. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 14 CVS 635 ABRONS FAMILY PRACTICE AND ) URGENT CARE, PA; NASH OB-GYN ) ASSOCIATES, PA; HIGHLAND ) OBSTETRICAL-GYNECOLOGICAL CLINIC,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025 No. 24-50149 ____________
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-50149 Document: 280 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 3, 2025
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021-03-02 · Published · cited 60× · 990 F.3d 94
18-163-cr United States v. Scott In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 18-163-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. GERALD SCOTT,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020-03-31 · Published · cited 10× · 954 F.3d 74
18-163 United States v. Scott 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2018 6 7 (Argued: January 10, 2019 Decided: March 31, 2020) 8 9 Docket No. 18-163 10 11 ____________________ 12 13 UNITED
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-08-10 · Published · cited 95× · 44 F.4th 218
USCA4 Appeal: 20-6848 Doc: 37 Filed: 08/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 41 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6848 MARC PIERRE HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendan
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-03-01 · Published · cited 0× · 371 F. Supp. 3d 37
George A. O'Toole, Jr., United States District Judge The defendant, Christopher Saemisch, is charged by indictment with one count of distribution of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). He has moved to suppress evidence seized as a result of his arrest, contending that suppression is required because Homeland Security agents located him by using real-time cell site location information ("CSLI") for which no cou
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50329 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 8:17-cr-00076-CJC-1 8:17-cr-00076-CJC JEFFREY OLSEN, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND AMEN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-01-06 · Published · cited 45× · 21 F.4th 1036
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50329 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 8:17-cr-00076-CJC-1 8:17-cr-00076-CJC JEFFREY OLSEN, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND AMEN
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021-01-22 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2969 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the No