Cases

ORDER Honorable Steven P. Logan, United States District Judge At issue are Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Mark Brnovich, Cara Christ, M.D., Patricia E. McSorley, Richard T. Perry, James Gillard, Jodi A. Bain, Marc D. Berg, Donna Brister, R. Screven Farmer, Gary R. Figge, Robert E. Fromm, Paul S. Gerding, Lois Krahn, Edward G. Paul, and Wanda J. Salter. (Docs. 40, 41, 44, 46.) Plaintiffs Planned

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE ESTATE OF RICHARD F. BRADY SR., et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. TEMPE LIFE CARE VILLAGE, INC., Defendant/Appellee ______________________________________________________ KENNETH BRADY, et al., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. GRACE MCKEE, et al., A

ORDER Douglas L. Rayes, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are Leslie Feldman, Luz Ma-gallanes, Mercedez Hymes, Julio Morera, and Cleo Ovalle, Democrats and registered voters in Maricopa County, Arizona; Peterson Zah, former Chairman and First President of the Navajo Nation, and a registered voter in Apache County, Arizona; the Democratic National Committee; the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm

Dissent by Chief Judge THOMAS OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: In April 2016, Leslie Feldman and other appellants1 brought an action in district court challenging Arizona House Bill 2023 *1061(H.B. 2023), which precludes individuals who do not fall into one of several exceptions (e.g., election off

Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge N.R. SMITH ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: We granted, in a prior order, rehearing en bane in this appeal. In a separate order, filed concurrently with this opinion, -we scheduled en banc oral argument for the week o

Opinion HOFFSTADT, J. Plaintiff Edward J. Roberts (plaintiff) enrolled in a private health plan offering benefits to persons 65 and over as well as *137 disabled persons under the federally funded Medicare Advantage program (42 U.S.C. § 1395w-21 et seq.), and went to an urgent c

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD F. CEBULL, District Judge. I. Introduction Scottrade, Inc., an online brokerage firm, filed this interpleader action in early 2011 to resolve ownership of the account of a deceased account holder, James LeFeber (“Jim” or “LeFeber”). Although LeFeber executed a Transfer on Death Beneficiary Plan (“TOD Plan”) a month before hi

250 P.3d 558 (2011) In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Gloria WATERLOO, Deceased. Jack Zimmerman, Appellant, v. Vernon H. Allen, Jr.; Rev. Lee Allen, Sr.; The Estate of Dorothy Gale Duncan; Ralph M. Allen, Jr.; Steven E. Allen; Virginia Wyatt Cavenaugh; Benjamin F. Allen; Ashley Allen; June Allen Williams; Clarence W. Allen; Ervin Ray Allen; Wilmer E. Allen; Lawrence E. Allen; Greg Allen, Sr.; East Valley Fiduciary Service, Inc., as Personal Repr

OPINION JOHNSEN, Judge. ¶ 1 We hold in this case that a testator’s failure to create a “list of final instructions” that was to be attached to her will did not invalidate the testamentary intent with which she created the will. Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s order declining to admit the will to probate and remand for further proceedings. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

ORDER Honorable Steven P. Logan, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 32). The motion is fully briefed and, for the reasons that follow, will be denied. I. Background Plaintiff Nationwide DME, LLC (“Nationwide”) is a supplier of durable medical equipment, in particular “prescription therapeutic programmable comput

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Twenty-six states (the “states”) are challenging the government’s1 Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program (“DAPA”) as violative of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution. The district court determined that the states are likely to succeed on their, procedural APA claim, so it tem

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. The history of Indian law and in particular “decisions of the Supreme Court recognizing the validity of original Indian title 1 make the existence and extent of such aboriginal ownership a relevant issue in title examinations whenever a chain of title is traced back to a federal grant or patent.”

FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT July 21, 2015 _________________________________

234 P.3d 623 (2010) John Steven SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTER; City of Phoenix Police Department, a municipal corporation; Officer Borquez; Officer Moore; Officer Masad; Officer Coudret; Officer Edwards; Officer Kerely; Officer Ippel; Officer Smoger; and Officer Burke, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 09-0223. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: In this consolidated appeal we consider whether named plaintiffs may appeal a district court order denying final certification of a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (2007). The named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their individual claims with prejudice but seek to pursue an appeal on behalf of others who opted

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 12-1446 and 12-1903 KAREN CAMESI; ERIN O'CONNELL; LORI SHAFFER; DINAH BAKER, on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated, Appellants in Case No. 12-1446 v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER; UPMC; UPMC HEALTH SYSTEM; UPMC BEDFORD MEMORIAL HOSP

492 F.3d 1094 (2007) Peg BALL; Bennie James, as grandfather and guardian of Cree James, a minor person; Jeanne Spinka, as an individual and as a representative of a class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Venetta Graham; Peggy William; Judeth Hinton; Grace Collier; Virginia Haskell; Larry Williams, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees, v. Anthony D. RODGERS, Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, The A

OPINION AND ORDER HAGGERTY, District Judge: Plaintiff, the Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) brought this action for declaratory relief against the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 to determine its rights and obligations in complying with administrative subpoenas issued by the DEA. The American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc., John Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _____________________________________ ) UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 16-157 (RMC) ) ALEX M

JUSTICE WELCH, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. In a case concerning custody of children of tender years, the trial judge sees how mother, father and child testify as well as what they say; even when they are not testifying, parents and child demonstrate to the judge how they act, react, and interact. It is no surprise then, that this court defers when it can