Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.

496 F.3d 564 (2007) Emilio VASQUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant v. Kurt JONES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 04-2274. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 18, 2007. Decided and Filed: July 24, 2007. *565 *566 ARGUED: Bridget M. McCormack, Michigan Clinical

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 07a0166p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Petitioner-Appellant, - EMILIO

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.

OPINION COOK, Circuit Judge. Emilio Salomon Vasquez appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. We reverse and remand with instructions to grant the petition. I. Facts and Procedural History In 1995, a dispute at a block party between Deondre Byrd and William Taylor escalated into a

OPINIÓN Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, - Justice On February 26, 2016, a Bexar County jury found that Appellant Lawrence W. Shipley III and Appellee Andrea Vasquez entered into an oral agreement and Skip-ley subsequently breached that agreement. The jury awarded Vasquez $216,000.00 in damages against Shipley. The trial court denied Shipley’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdi

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Wenseslado Vega-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vega-Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed couns

PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Wilson Antonio Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portio

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Carmelo Rodriguez-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

NAKAMOTO, J. *1109**611Defendant Double Press Manufacturing, Inc. seeks review of a decision of the Court of Appeals affirming a trial court judgment against defendant that included an award of noneconomic damages to plaintiff in the amount of $4,860,

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Santos Esteban Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Vasquez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the rec

Per Curiam. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered.

MEMORANDUM OPINION G. MICHAEL HARVEY, UNITED , STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This case was referred to this Court for all purposes. Currently ripe is Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification of a collective action under the D.C. Minimum Wage Revision Act (“DCMWRA”), D.C. Code § 32-1001 et seq. After reviewing the entire record,

155 P.3d 588 (2006) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy J. VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04CA0730. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VI. December 28, 2006. Certiorari Denied April 9, 2007. *590 John W. Suthers, Attorney General, Laurie A. Booras, Assistant Attorney General, Denver,

CALABRESI, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents a new twist on a familiar issue: What requirements must a *100prisoner meet before he can maintain a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that challenges sanctions imposed pursuant to a prison disciplinary proceeding? The case law is clear that when a prisoner’s challenge either to the process or the result of a prison disciplina

56 F.3d 71NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dennis C. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Daniel B. VASQUEZ, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16721. United States Court

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alvaro Rojas-Vasquez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rojas-Vasquez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, cou

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* WADE BRORBY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Appellant Ernesto

488 F.3d 316 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roman RODARTE-VASQUEZ, also known as Carlos Carrillo-Lopez, also known as Roman Rodriguez-Meza, Defendant-Appellant. andUnited States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Juan A. Ramirez-Ramirez, also known as Juan Ramirez-Rodriguez, also known as Juan Anatalio Ramirez-Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-50224. No. 04-502

[Cite as State v. Vasquez, 2024-Ohio-860.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-22-1192 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201801191 v. Devaun Vasquez DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant