Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “VICKI ANN HAWS”
State v. Arakipublic domain
923 P.2d 891 (1996) 82 Hawai`i 474 The STATE of Hawai`i, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,[1] v. Noriyuki ARAKI, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 19042, 19130. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. August 30, 1996. *893 Vickie L.S. Kapp, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, on the briefs, Honolulu, for pl
Lambert v. Wahapublic domain
Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. I. INTRODUCTION This case arises out of a dispute over title to a parcel of land in Lá‘ie, 0‘ahu, referred to as Parcel 33, in which the ownership interests of individuals holding estates in common were challenged by a co-owner of the property as the statutory period for adverse possession was nea
State v. Kameenuipublic domain
753 P.2d 1250 (1988) STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan KAMEENUI, Defendant-Appellant. STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David KEALOHA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 12347, 12353. Supreme Court of Hawaii. May 9, 1988. *1251 Clifford Hunt, (Melody Anne Parker and Susan Barr on the opening brief and Susan B
Lambert v. Wahapublic domain
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-JUL-2024 02:27 PM Dkt. 32 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
Dasalia v. Onakapublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 20-NOV-2020 07:51 AM Dkt. 78 MO
Lambert v. Wahapublic domain
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001024 28-JUL-2015 11:11 AM SCWC-12-0001024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI HOVEY B. LAMBERT, TRUSTEE UNDER THAT HOVEY B. LAMBERT TRUST, an
Lambert v. Wahapublic domain
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0001024 10-JUN-2015 07:50 AM SCWC-12-0001024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI HOVEY B. LAMBERT, TRUSTEE UNDER THAT HOVEY B. LAMBERT TRUST, an
In re the Marriage of Farmerpublic domain
¶1 — This case involves a trial court's method of valuing stock options in a dissolution proceeding. After separating, Daniel and Teresa Farmer entered into a stipulated agreement dividing their community assets, including several thousand stock options Daniel1 had received from his employer during the marriage. Under the terms of the agreement, Teresa could decide when to exercise her share of the stock options. Before entry of the d
Lambert v. Wahapublic domain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-MAY-2024 08:10 AM Dkt. 429 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE INT
Murken v. Solv-Ex Corp.public domain
OPINION PICKARD, Judge. {1} In this class action appeal, we decide whether the district court was divested of jurisdiction over the merits of the case due to a pending appeal of the denial of a motion to intervene brought by nonnamed class members. We also consider issues contending the district court abused its discretion in certifying a class for purposes of settlemen
Zimmerman v. Marshpublic domain
Justice PLEICONES, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. While the Zimmermans’ conduct may properly be characterized as acquisitive, they have done nothing illegal. A joint tenant may compel partition. S.C.Code Ann. § 15-61-10 (2005). A court may order partition in kind, that is, divide the property among all the owners, or by allotment, that is, to “allot” a portion of the property to one of th
Dolan v. Hilo Medical Centerpublic domain
Opinion of the Court by LEONARD, J. Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Rosalinda Iturralde (Appellant or, in reference to her individual capacity, Rosalinda), individually and in her capacity as personal representative of the Estate of Arturo Iturralde (Arturo’s Estate), and Defendants-Appel-lees/Cross-Appellants Hilo Medical Center, Hawai'i Health Systems Corporation, State of Hawai'i (collectively, HMC), appe
Blixseth v. Brownpublic domain
470 B.R. 562 (2012) Timothy L. BLIXSETH, Plaintiff, v. Stephen BROWN, an individual; Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP, a Montana professional limited liability partnership; James A. Patten, an individual; Patten Peterman Bekkedahl & Green, PLLC, a Montana professional limited liability company; J. Thomas Beckett, an individual; Parsons Behle & Latimer, a Utah professional corporation; Thomas L. Hutchinson, an individual; Bullivant, H
State v. Williams-Beypublic domain
LAVINE, J. In recent years, the United States and Connecticut Supreme Courts have made major changes in the jurisprudence relating to juvenile sentencing. The law now requires that juvenile offenders facing life without parole or its functional equivalent are entitled to individual consideration that takes into account the mitigating factors of their youth. This case concerns the import
Boyd v. City of Oaklandpublic domain
458 F.Supp.2d 1015 (2006) Cammerin K. BOYD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. No. C 03-3391 JL. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 17, 2006. *1019 Vicki I. Sarmiento, Law Offices of Vicki I. Sarmiento, Marylon M. Boyd, Law Offices *1020 of Marylon M. Boyd,
Arvest Mortgage Co. v. Nail (In Re Nail)public domain
427 B.R. 495 (2010) In re Elizabeth NAIL, Debtor. Arvest Mortgage Company, Plaintiff v. Elizabeth Nail, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 5:09-bk-72059. Adversary No. 5:09-ap-7121. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. April 9, 2010. *496 Burton E. Stacy, Jr., Hood & Stacy, P.A., Bentonville, AR, f
Riggs v. Georgia-Pacificpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH MICAH RIGGS and AMANDA RIGGS, Appellees, v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC and UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Appellants. No. 20130459
Lewistown Propane Co. v. Fordpublic domain
42 P.3d 229 (2002) 2002 MT 27 LEWISTOWN PROPANE COMPANY, a Montana Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Tom H. FORD, individually and d/b/a Ford Cattle Company; Vicki Ehlert and Robert Ehlert, husband and wife, Defendants/Respondents/Cross-Appellants. Raymond Becky, Intervenor/Respondent. No. 01-037. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs Dece
In re Estate of Fultonpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 20-PR-0729 IN RE ESTATE OF BERTIE MAE FULTON; RODNEY JAMES LURK, APPELLANT,
Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.public domain
232 S.W.3d 28 (2007) Anthony TIGG et al. v. PIRELLI TIRE CORPORATION et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 6, 2007 Session. August 16, 2007. *29 Richard L. Colbert, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Pirelli Tire Corporation. George E. Barrett, Gerald E. Martin, David W. Garrison, and Edmund L. Carey,