Cases

OPINION WRIGHT, Justice. This ease presents several issues regarding disqualification of legal counsel because of a violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.9(a) arising from a conflict of interest with a former client. These issues include who has standing to appeal a district court order granting a motion to disqualify, the legal standard for determining whether Rule 1.9(a) has been violated, and whether t

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3553 ___________________________ Louis Gareis; Lillian Gareis Plaintiffs - Appellants v. 3M Company; Arizant Healthcare, Inc. Defendants - Appellees ___________________________ No. 18-3580 ___________________________ Louis Gareis; Lillian Gareis Plaintiffs -

02-11-092-CV

OPINION BILL MEIER, Justice. I.INTRODUCTION Appellant and Cross-Appellee H.E.B., L.L.C. appeals the final judgment awarding Appellee and Cross-Appellant Horace T. Ardinger, Jr. $1,300,405.04. Ardinger appeals the trial court’s denial of his requests for declaratory relief and for attorneys’ fees. We will affirm the trial court’s j

565 N.W.2d 16 (1997) MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Texas Petitioner, v. NISHIKA LTD., LenTec Corporation, American 3D Ltd., and Nishika Manufacturing (H.K.) Ltd., Texas Respondents. No. C2-96-2542. Supreme Court of Minnesota. June 12, 1997. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1997. *18 Maslon Edelman Borman &a;

OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: Defendant City of Tumwater enacted two ordinances that seek to preserve the existing stock of manufactured home parks within the municipality by limiting the uses of certain properties. Plaintiffs are three of the affected property owners — : Laurel Park Community, LLC; Tumwater Estates Investors; and Velkommen Mobile Pa

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 510 OPINION Isaiah Clark, a Texas resident, filed a medical malpractice suit in the 101st District Court in Dallas County, Texas, against Frank Noyes, M.D., an Ohio resident. Dr. Noyes filed a special appearance to present a motion objecting to jurisdiction by the Texas court.

231 P.3d 12 (2009) Richard JACKSON, Mary Jackson, Thomas Fehringer, Robert Hradecky, Deborah Hradecky, Dean Lousberg, and Lousberg Partnership, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNOCAL CORPORATION, Unocal Oil Company of California, and Unocal Pipeline Company, Defendants-Appellants. No. 09CA0610. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. A. Ju

156 F.3d 1030 29 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,032, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 15,331,98 CJ C.A.R. 5094 James E. AKIN; Richard G. Arellano; Charles L. Baldwin;Annie M. Barnes; Terry D. Blain; Marcia Bannock; DeltonE. Brown; Timothy L. Caraway; Thomas W. Clark; RichardCotey; Connie Cottrell; Ronnie D. Cottrell; Steven L.Coy; Hugh Crow; Nathan D'Amico; Donna M. Davis; Louis R.Dickinson; Ollie Dilli

384 So.2d 701 (1980) Blanche Harris KINGSLAND, Trustee, Appellant, v. NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, a Subsidiary of 3M Company, Appellee. No. 78-2471/T4-295. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 28, 1980. *702 William L. Coalson of Greene & Greene, P.A., Jacksonville, and Swann, Swann & Haddock, P.A.,

180 F.Supp.2d 1097 (2002) Jeff BISCHOFF and Mitchell Guzik, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTV, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00CV09541. United States District Court, C.D. California. January 14, 2002. *1098 *1099 *1100</

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. *286BACKGROUND 287 I. PURCHASE OF THE ADT SECURITY SYSTEM........................287 II. AGREEMENT BETWEEN LEE AND ADT.............................290 III. ALLEGED SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURE ............................291

720 S.W.2d 376 (1986) LENDAL LEASING, LTD., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FARMER'S WAYSIDE STORES, INC., and Rudolph & Doris Meyer, Defendants-Appellants. No. 50807. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. October 28, 1986. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1986. *377 Lee Young, Daniel M. Buescher,

(2008) POLY-FLEX CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, v. NEYER, TISEO & HINDO, LTD., d/b/a NTH Consultants, a Michigan corporation, Defendant. No. 1:07-cv-1090. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 6, 2008. Opinion and Order PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge. Granting the Defend

BACKGROUND GREENE, District J. On November 13, 1992, plaintiffs filed this toxic tort ease in state court at Beaumont, Texas. After receipt of answers to interrogatories, defendant General Electric (GE) removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The Texas district court judge upheld removal jurisdiction, de

FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST CROIX HESS OIL VIRGIN ISLANDS CORPORATION ) CASE NO SX 05 CV 165 ) Plaintiff ) COMPLEX LITIGATION DIVISION ) V )

369 F.Supp. 730 (1974) William C. HUMPHREY, Regional Director of the Fifth Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. DRIVERS, CHAUFFEURS & HELPERS LOCAL 639 affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Respondent. Civ. No. 73-1212-W. United States District Court, D

MEMORANDUM OPINION BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge. INTRODUCTION A. The Trial Proceedings 1. The trial of this case lasted for 48 trial days commencing on February 28, 1996 and concluding on August 1, 1996.1 There was a lengthy hiatus in the trial between April 4, 1996 and June 25, 1996 necessitated by a serious injury suffer

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 5659167 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV SEE AMENDED BRF 5648230 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FILED ON 6/15/15 AUSTIN, TEXAS