Cases

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT Brenda Mackey as representative of * From the 441st District the Estate of Violet Childs, deceased, Court of Midland County, Trial Court No. CV48144. Vs. No. 11-13-00083-CV * March 31, 2015 Midland-Odessa Transit * Memorandum Opinion by Mc

Opinion filed March 31, 2015 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-13-00083-CV __________ BRENDA MACKEY AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF VIOLET CHILDS, DECEASED, Appellant V. MIDLAND-ODESSA TRANSIT D/B/A EZ RIDER, Appellee On Appeal from the 441st District Court

07/30/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 1, 2023 IN RE VIOLET R. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 21A0227 Mike Dumitru, Judge ___________________________________

Justice Goldberg, for the Court. *162 The respondent, Jennifer L. (respondent), appeals from a decree entered in the Family Court that terminated her parental rights with respect to her daughter, Violet G., who was born on December 24, 2013. This case came before the Supreme Court on March 2

Matter of Violet P. (Catherine P.) (2021 NY Slip Op 06174) Matter of Violet P. (Catherine P.) 2021 NY Slip Op 06174 Decided on November 10, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Repo

Nebraska Advance Sheets IN RE INTEREST OF VIOLET T. 949 Cite as 286 Neb. 949 with a lack of information regarding the nature and extent of the misconduct and the attorney’s present or future fit- ness to practice law. We declined to disbar the attorney and instead imposed an indefinite suspension. Similarly, under the facts of this case, we conclude that an indefinite suspen- sion, with a minimum suspension of 3

The record reflects that the father’s attorney consented to the order, and “no appeal lies from an order entered on the consent of the appealing party” (Matter of Lah De W. [Takisha W.], 78 AD3d 523, 523 [2010]). The attorney was familiar with the matter, had represented the father on numerous prior occasions in the case, and had obtained an adjournment to ascertain the father’s position on a proposed resolution of the application for visitation

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 4, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ___________________

Filed 5/27/26; Supreme Court publication order 7/30/26 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO In re VIOLET S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. E087240 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, (Super.Ct.No.

WINFREE, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION The superior court terminated a mother's and father's parental rights, finding their two children were in need of aid based on abandonment, incarceration, risk of domestic violence, and substance abuse. The court also determined that the Office of Children's Services (OCS) had satisfied its duty to make reaso

JUDGE SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS *25This matter is a discovery dispute arising in an expropriation action. Defendant/appellant Violet Dock Port, Inc., LLC ("Violet Dock") appeals the trial court's May 31, 2016 judgment, which partially granted a Motion to Compel filed by appellee/plaintiff St. Bernard Port, Harbor & Terminal District ("St. Berna

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-061-CR JOEL LEE VIOLET APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS

BYBEE, Circuit Judge. Violet Bruce appeals her conviction for simple assault on an Indian child less than 16 years of age on a reservation in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1152 and 118(a)(5). In her sole claim of error, Bruce asserts that the case against her was brought under the wrong statute. The government charged Bruce under § 1152, which covers offenses committed in Indian country, but excepts crimes committed by an India

Joel Lee Violet v. The State of Texas COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-03-061-CR JOEL LEE VIOLET APPELLANT <

Opinion McDONALD, Acting P. J. Violet R. and James R., Sr. (together the parents), appeal judgments declaring their minor children James R., Jr., Wesley and Violet III (collectively the minors) dependents of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 300, subdivision (b) and placing the minors with the parents conditioned on Violet having supervised contact with

Defendant Kevin Childs was convicted after a jury trial in the circuit court of McLean County of residential burglary (720 ILCS 5/19-3 (West 1992)), aggravated unlawful restraint (720 ILCS 5/10-3.1 (West 1992)), two counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault (720 ILCS 5/12-14 (West 1992)), and violation of an order of protection (720 ILCS 5/12-30

April 29, 1999 NO. 4-97-0540 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from Plaintiff-Appellee, ) Circuit Court of

662 N.E.2d 161 (1996) 278 Ill. App.3d 65 214 Ill.Dec. 807 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin CHILDS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 4-93-1128. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. Argued August 22, 1995. Decided February 29, 1996. *162

NO. 07-99-0158-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY 25, 2001 ______________________________ IN THE INTERES

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2023 WY 16 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2022 February 14, 2023 DWIGHT LYMAN and BETTY L. LYMAN, as individuals and as Trustees of the Dwight Lyman Living Trust dated November 11, 2016, and Trustees of the Betty L. Lyman Living Trust dated November 11, 2016, Appellants