Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Valencia Denise Thomas”
Denise Coley v. Lucas County, Ohiopublic domain
OPINION JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. The family of Carlton Benton, a pretrial detainee, was told that he died of natural causes in the Lucas County jail in 2004. This case, alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law, was brought in 2008 when family members discovered that jail employees had shoved Benton to a cement floor, held him in a chokeho
People v. Valenciapublic domain
OPINION A jury found Denise Valencia guilty of possessing a sawed-off shotgun in violation of Penal Code section 12020, subdivision (a). Her sole contention on appeal is that the prosecution failed to prove that she knew the object was a sawed-off shotgun. We conclude that the prosecution was not required to prove such knowledge. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. FACTS Detective Thomas Leary testified that
United States v. Fariaspublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted defendants, brothers Jorge and Adrian Farias, of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute illegal drugs. On appeal, Jorge argues that a prior plea agreement should have precluded his prosecution. Jorge and Adrian both argue insufficient evidence and improper sentencing. We AFFIRM the convictions and sentences.
Davis v. Cliffordpublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. LaTonya Davis, proceeding pro se, brought this action against four Lakewood Police Department officers and the City of Lakewood (the “City”). She alleges that the officers used excessive force in arresting her for a misdemeanor offense. Upon stopping Davis’ car, which had a license plate with a handicapped symbol, for driving with a suspended license, Of
Gangadeen v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
654 F.Supp.2d 169 (2009) Milford GANGADEEN, Ronald Brow, Sharon Halloway, and Akindra Reape, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, Thomas R. Frieden, Sarah Beatrice, Thomas J. Breuers, and Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 10965(DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 12, 2
Garcia v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Servicespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge As modernist architect Ludwig Mies van der Rohe once reflected, “It is not possible to go forward while looking back.” Yet that is exactly what Plaintiff Armando Moya *54 Garcia, an alien emigré
Brooks v. Barnhartpublic domain
339 F.Supp.2d 183 (2004) Denise BROOKS, Plaintiff v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant No. CIV.A.03-30114-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 30, 2004. Karen L. Goodwin, United States Attorney's Office, Springfield, MA, for Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. Ca
Garver v. Rosenbergpublic domain
AMENDED OPINION* This opinion is subject to revision before final Publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 39 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH DAVID and KATHERYN GARVER, Appellants, v. THOMAS ROSENBERG, M.D., et. al.,
Garver v. Rosenbergpublic domain
AMENDED OPINION* This opinion is subject to revision before final Publication in the Pacific Reporter 2015 UT 39 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH DAVID and KATHERYN GARVER, Appellants, v. THOMAS ROSENBERG, M.D., et. al.,
Garver v. Rosenbergpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before final Publication in the Pacific Reporter 2014 UT 42 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH DAVID AND KATHERYN GARVER, Appellants, v. THOMAS ROSENBERG, M.D., et. al., Appellees.
Mullane v. United States Department of Justicepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1094 23-1104 JONATHAN MULLANE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC21-284 IN RE: AMENDMENT TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 6-10.3. December 16, 2021 PER CURIAM. Earlier this year, the Court amended the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar to preclude continuing legal education credit for “any course submitted by a sponsor, including a section of The Florida Bar, that uses quotas based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation in the selection of course faculty or participants.” In re
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC21-284 IN RE: AMENDMENT TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 6-10.3. December 16, 2021 PER CURIAM. Earlier this year, the Court amended the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar to preclude continuing legal education credit for “any course submitted by a sponsor, including a section of The Florida Bar, that uses quotas based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation in the selection of course faculty or participants.” In re
199 F.3d 78 (2nd Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,v.ROBERT A. ALIOTTA, WILFRED W. LEYLAND, and WILLIAM PETERS, Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 97-1561(L), 97-1619August Term, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSSECOND CIRCUIT Argued: Feb. 11, 1999Decided: Dec. 7, 1999 Appeal from a judgme
409 F.3d 1113 Victor MENOTTI; Thomas Sellman; Todd Stedl; Doug Skove, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF SEATTLE; Paul Schell, Former Mayor of the City of Seattle; Norman Stamper, Former Chief of Police of the City of Seattle; Sharon Stevens, a Seattle Police Detective; Ronald Smith, a Seattle Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees.Kenneth Hankin; Jennifer Hudziec; Stephanie Lane; Denise Cooper; Nicole Pearson; on behalf of themselves and al
United States v. Sierra Pacific Industriespublic domain
ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on affirmative defenses. (ECF 351.) This matter was heard on February 10, 2012; Kelli Taylor appeared for plaintiff and William Warne appeared for defendants. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is hereby granted, in part and denied in part.
Perkowski v. Stratford Board of Educationpublic domain
455 F.Supp.2d 91 (2006) Joann PERKOWSKI, Plaintiff v. The STRATFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:04CV2016(CFD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. October 3, 2006. *92 Thomas W. Bucci, Willinger, Willinger & Bucci, Bridgeport, CT, for Plaintiff. Richard J. Buturla, Warren L. Holcomb, Ber
People v. Daltonpublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Liu, J. *176 Defendant Kerry Lyn Dalton was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder and the first degree murder of Irene Melanie May. (Pen. Code former § 182, subd. (a)(1), § 187, subd. (a), former § 189 (all further undesignated statutory references are to this code
Glick v. Los Angelespublic domain
Filed 7/30/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO STEPHEN GLICK et al., B334953 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 20STCV00320) CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant. APPEALS from a
Menotti v. City of Seattlepublic domain
PAEZ, Circuit Judge, concurring and dissenting: I concur in the majority’s holding that Seattle’s Civil Emergency Order Number 3 (Order No. 3) was content-neutral and served a significant government interest. I cannot agree, however, that Order No. 3 was narrowly tailored and left open ample alternative channels of communication. I also disagree with the majority’s determinat