Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Valenti v. Massapequa Union Free School District”
Edwards v. Huntington Union Free School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. Plaintiff Wayne Edwards brings the above-captioned action against Defendant Huntington Union Free School District, asserting claims of racial discrimination, hostile work environment and retaliation under Title VII, § 1981, § 1983, New York State Human Rights Law and Suffolk County Human Rights Law. Defendant moved for summary judgment and
Kantrowitz v. Uniondale Union Free School Districtpublic domain
822 F.Supp.2d 196 (2011) Greta KANTROWITZ, Plaintiff, v. UNIONDALE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. No. 08-CV-3592 (JFB)(ETB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 30, 2011. *199 Steven A. Morelli, Elaine R. Sammon, and Lorraine M. Ferrigno of the Law Offices of Steven A. Morelli, P.C., Garden Cit
Tyrrell v. Seaford Union Free School Districtpublic domain
792 F.Supp.2d 601 (2011) Megan TYRRELL, Plaintiff, v. SEAFORD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Seaford High School, Michael J. Ragon, Paula Sussman, George Duffy, III, and Brian Conboy, all in their individual and official capacity, Defendants. No. CV-08-4811 SJF WDW. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 1, 2011. *606 Fre
ORDER ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge. By motions filed April 13, 2011, the District Defendants1 and defendant Tom Kretsos moved for summary judgment of *525all plaintiffs’ claims. (Doc. Nos. 157, 158.) By Order entered October 25, 2011, this Court referred those motions to the assigned Magistrate Judge,
Tyson v. Access Servicespublic domain
MEMORANDUM RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Baylson, District Judge. I.Introduction In this employment discrimination and retaliation case, plaintiff Beth Tyson (“Ms. Tyson” or “Plaintiff’) alleges that defendant Access Services (“Access” or “Defendant”), her former employer, violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (“ADA” or the “Act”) by discriminating against her for her associat
Carpenter v. City of Mount Vernonpublic domain
OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jennifer Carpenter brings this action against Defendants City of Mount Vernon, Mayor Ernest D. Davis,1 Commissioner Terrance Raynor, Chief James M. Dumser, Deputy Commissioner Richard Burke, Captain Michael Goldman, Lieutenant Mario Curzio, and Lieutenant Joseph Hunce, in their official and indiv
Burhans v. Lopezpublic domain
*378 OPINION AND ORDER AN ALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiffs, Victoria Burhans and Chloé Rivera, bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging gender discrimination and hostile work environment in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Plaintiffs also assert parallel state and city law claims, alleg
Lener v. Hempstead Public Schoolspublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Susan Lener (“Lener” or “plaintiff’) brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against defendants Hempstead Public Schools (“the District”)1 and Julius Brown (“Brown”), alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, religion, and disability, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitutio
Meadors v. Ulster Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER SCULLIN, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. No. 29.1 Plaintiffs oppose this motion. See Dkt. Nos. 33-40. II. BACKGROUND In July 2008, Plaintiffs filed charges of discrimination with the United Sta
Pierre v. Napolitanopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff, a Special Agent employed by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”), commenced this action for employment discrimination on July 19, 2011, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Americ
Manigaulte v. C.W. Post of Long Island Universitypublic domain
659 F.Supp.2d 367 (2009) John Carlo MANIGAULTE, Plaintiff, v. C.W. POST OF LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. 08-CV-1853(JS)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 15, 2009. *371 John Carlo Manigaulte, Kings Park, NY, pro se. Catherine Murphy, Esq., Office General Counsel, Long Island University,
Rocco v. Goldberg (In re Goldberg)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION ROBERT E. GROSSMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment by the Plaintiff, Mary Rocco (“Plaintiff”), and the Debtor-Defendant (“Debtor”), Jeffrey L. Goldberg, in this adversary proceeding seeking a determination of dischargeability pursuant to section 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Plaintiff and the Debtor each recognize that the c
Chin-McKenzie v. Continuum Health Partnerspublic domain
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Defendants Continuum Health Partners, Inc. (“Continuum”) and Long Island College Hospital (“LICH”) move for summary judgment against the Complaint of Glenis Chin-McKenzie, which claims sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, and discrimination on the basis
Romero v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, District Judge. On June 25, 2008, plaintiff Pilar Romero commenced this action as the biological mother and legal guardian of her then-minor daughter Jane Doe (together with Pilar Romero, “plaintiffs”) against defendants the City of New York (the “City”); the New York City Department of Education (“the NYCDOE”); the Special Commissioner of Investigation for
De Curtis v. Ferrandina (In re Ferrandina)public domain
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Alan S. Trust, United States Bankruptcy Judge Pending before the Court is the motion (the “Motion”) filed by the plaintiff, Donna De Curtis (“De Curtis”), seeking summary judgment that a debt owed to her by Debt- or, Thomas E. Ferrandina (“Ferrandina”), is nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) as arising from a willful and m
Wilks v. Elizabeth Arden, Inc.public domain
507 F.Supp.2d 179 (2007) Trevor WILKS, Plaintiff, v. ELIZABETH ARDEN, INC., Defendant. No. 3:04CV01655(DJS). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. August 28, 2007. *180 *181 *182 *183
Soundview Associates v. Town of Riverheadpublic domain
725 F.Supp.2d 320 (2010) SOUNDVIEW ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF RIVERHEAD; Town Board of Riverhead; Planning Department of the Town of Riverhead; Richard Ehlers, Individually; Dawn C. Thomas, Individually; and John Does and/or Jane Does # 1-6, Individually and Personally, Defendants. No. 09-CV-4095 (JFB)(AKT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 14, 2010.