Cases

OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: On November 5, 2007, a jury convicted Brent Wilkes on thirteen charges, including wire fraud, bribery, conspiracy, and money laundering, in connection with his long-running scheme to bribe former Congressman Randall “Duke” Cunningham. Wilkes was sentenced to 144 months in prison and ordered to pay a $636,116 criminal f

63 Md. App. 197 (1985) 492 A.2d 637 THEODORE BRENT v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1182, September Term, 1984. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 15, 1985. John L. Kopolow and Jose F. Anderson, Asst. Public Defenders, Baltimore (Alan H. Murrell, Baltimore, Public Defender on the brief), for appellant. Valerie V. Cloutier, Asst. Atty.

FILED 18-0351 5/22/2020 2:53 PM tex-43191677

FILED 18-0351 5/22/2020 2:52 PM tex-43191602

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia, FILED Plaintiff Below, Respondent February 11, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Valerie Hawkins (“Hawkins”) and Janice Patterson (“Patterson”) appeal the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Community Bank of Raymore (“Community”) on their claim under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq., and the district court’s order striking their demand for a jury trial. For the reasons described below, w

PARKER, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant John Bianco appeals from the judgement of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, Judge) entered August 20, 1998, convicting appellant, after his plea of guilty, of conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, more than 100 pounds of marijuana. Appellant argues on

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., HODGES, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules Jun

Justice Devine delivered the opinion of the Court. The Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides for an interlocutory appeal *906from an order that “grants or denies a plea to the jurisdiction by a governmental unit.” Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.014(a)(8). The term “governmental unit” has the same meaning here as it does in the T

662 F.3d 524 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brent Roger WILKES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-50063. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 29, 2011. Filed October 19, 2011. *529 Reuben C. Cahn, Shereen J. Charlick (argued) and Gabriel L. Cohan, Federal D

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND DAVID A. EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Remand filed by Plaintiffs Valerie Redus, individually, and Robert Redus, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert Cameron Redus (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). (“Mot.” Dkt. #6.) On November 17, 2014, the Court held a hearing on the Motion. Brent C. Perry, Mason W. H

ACCEPTED 04-15-00120-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 6/12/2015 3:1

KAREN R. BAKER, Justice, concurring. I agree that we must affirm the circuit court’s denial of Halpaine’s motion to dismiss the charge of criminal nonsupport. However, I write separately because I am concerned with the circuit court’s finding that Halpaine had been held in criminal contempt for nonsupport. Instead, he was compelled to pay court-ordered support through civ

OPINION Opinion by: Jason Pulliam, Justice University of the Incarnate Word (UIW) brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order' denying its plea to the jurisdiction. In its plea to the jurisdiction, UIW asserted the trial court is without subject matter jurisdiction because UIW is entitled to governmental immunity. On appeal, the Redus plaintiffs (the Reduses) filed a motion

ACCEPTED 04-15-00120-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:23:44 PM

ACCEPTED 04-15-00120-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/10/2015

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. hThe plaintiff/appellant, Mark J. Titus (“Mr. Titus”), has appealed a judgment that granted a peremptory exception of prescription in favor of defendants /appel-lees, Tim D, Wilson, Sr. and Tim D. Wilson Investigations, Inc. (collectively “Mr. Wilson”), which dismissed Mr. Wilson from *257this litigation. After reviewing the record and the a

¶ 1 Salt Lake County ("County") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Brent D. Young ("Young") requiring the County to disclose disciplinary records and investigative files. We affirm in part and reverse in part. BACKGROUND ¶ 2 Young was employed by the Salt Lake County Sheriff's Department ("Sheriff's Department") as a deputy sheriff. Young's employment was terminated on January 14, 2000, allegedly for an incident

NUMBER 13-08-108-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS <

Case Number: 05-06-00018-CV 05/01/2008 Case stored in record room 04/16/2008 Notice sent to Court of Appeals 02/29/2008 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 01/31/2008 Additional citations received. 01/29/2008 Case forwarded to Court 01/23/2008 Response to Petition for Review waived 01/09/2008 Third m/e/t to file petition for review disposed Granted 01/09/2008 Petition for Review filed 01/09/2008 Appendix Filed 01/08/2008 Third m/e/t to file petition for review filed 01/04/2008 Call