Cases

Opinion MARCHIANO, P. J. Defendant Myesha Marie Quarterman, on probation, pawned a camera and camera accessories, allegedly with knowledge that the items were stolen. She was charged with receiving stolen property and violation of her probation. A joint preliminary hearing and probation violation hearing was held, at which only a police officer testified to various hearsay

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GREGORY L. BROWN, Nos. 20-16290 21-15922 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 4:20-cv-03405-YGR 4:21-cv-02649-YGR M. ATCHLEY, Warden,

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: The State of Texas sentenced Petitioner-Appellant Christopher Chubasco Wilkins to death for the murders of Willie Freeman and Mike Silva. Having unsuccessfully pursued federal habeas corpus relief, Wilkins now requests investigative and expert funding to support a state clemency petition and a successive state habeas petition.

42 Cal.Rptr.3d 116 (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th 951 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent. barnesandnoble.com, LLC, Real Party in Interest. No. H028833. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. April 20, 2006. *117 Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State

BEA, Circuit Judge, with whom O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joins as to paragraphs 1 and 4, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: 1. I join Judge Callahan’s dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc. 2. I write separately to reiterate my view that United States v. Davis, 825 F.3d 1014 (9th Cir.2016) (en banc), was wrongly decided. As I explained in my Davis dis

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ADRIAN REYES, No. 12-56650 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:12-cv-00691-GAF-E GREG LEWIS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Cal

Per Curiam : This is another suit by employees of the Government seeking compensation for time spent on Government premises during which they were permitted to sleep and eat. They have been paid under the “two-thirds” rule. The facts are fully set out in the report of the Commissioner. We have approved the application of this rule in quite a number of cases arising under several different Acts: the War Overtime

CoweN, Chief Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: In this suit, plaintiffs seek to recover back salaries allegedly owed to them as a result of demotions and separations made through reduction-in-force procedures by the Department of the Navy at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard in Vallejo, California (hereinafter referred to as Mare Island). Seven of the nineteen plaintiffs are veteran preference