Cases

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. This appeal stems from a quiet title action that began in Los Angeles Superior Court but was resuscitated in federal court after the California courts ruled against appellants John and Anne Henrichs (“Hen-richs”) on all issues. We consider whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over Henrichs’ claims arising from a California state cour

474 F.3d 609 John HENRICHS; Anne Henrichs, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPMENT, a California corporation; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a Federal corporation; Timcor Exchange Corporation, dba Timcor Financial Corporation; Marc Gelman, an individual; Michael Blaha, an individual; Granada Plaza Associates Ltd., a California limited partnership, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-56470.

E-FILED CNMI SUPREME COURT E-filed: Mar 07 2023 06:09PM Clerk Review: Mar 07 2023 06:09PM Filing ID: 69282543 Case No.: 2022-SCC-0019-CIV

HULL, J. Plaintiff Teresa Martine (Martine) hurt her knee while skiing at Heavenly Valley Ski Resort and was being helped down the mountain by a ski patrolman when the rescue sled in which she was riding went out of control and hit a tree. Martine sued resort owner Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership (Heavenly) for negligence and for damages arising from her injuries. Heavenly moved for summary judgment arguing that

DECISION & ORDER MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiffs Lee Valley Tools, Ltd., Veritas Tools, Inc. (Canada) and Veritas Tools, Inc. (USA) (collectively “Veritas”) have sued defendant Industrial Blade Company (“IBC”) *257for false advertising and unfair compet

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 18-1211 ══════════ INNOVATIVE BLOCK OF SOUTH TEXAS, LTD., PETITIONER V. VALLEY BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. D/B/A VALLEY BLOCK & BRICK, RESPONDENT ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF A

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1059 Doc: 42 Filed: 04/04/2023 Pg: 1 of 10 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1059 MARTIN C. CONWAY; PESNER KAWAMATO CONWAY, P.C., Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. SMITH DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

NUMBER 13-16-00419-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG INNOVATIVE BLOCK OF SOUTH TEXAS, LTD., Appellant, v. VALLEY BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. D/B/A VALLEY BLOCK AND BRICK, Appellee. On appeal from the 430th

NUMBER 13-16-00419-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG INNOVATIVE BLOCK OF SOUTH TEXAS, LTD., Appellant, v. VALLEY BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC. D/B/A VALLEY BLOCK AND BRICK, Appellee. On appeal from th

[J-46-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. MBC DEVELOPMENT, LP, MBC : No. 1 MAP 2023 MANAGEMENT, LLC, MBC PROPERTIES, : LP, JAMES L. MILLER, MILLER : Appeal from the Order of the PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, : Superior Court dated August 12, M

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. South Dakota Housing Authority, having claimed that it is “caught in the middle” between Plaintiffs and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the issues raised by the Plaintiffs in their Second Amended Complaint against South Dakota Housing Authority,

Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court. *104In this case, we consider whether the trial court erred in failing to apply the one-satisfaction rule and award a nonsettling defendant settlement credits. We hold that the one-satisfaction rule applies to this case, and the trial court therefore erred in denying the nonsettling defendant th

Opinion issued March 4, 2025. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00452-CV ——————————— STEWART & STEWARTS DEVELOPMENT, INC., Appellant V. REUBEN L. WRIGHT, Appellee

Donovan, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Harshman II Development Co., L.L.C., appeals a decision of the Montgomery Court of Common Pleas, General Division, in which the trial court sustained the motion for summary judgment of defendant-appellee Meijer Stores Limited Partnership (“Meijer”). The trial court filed its written decision on March 20, 2009. Harshman II filed a timely notice of appeal with this court on M

OPINION BY SOLANO, J.: Appellants Retina Associates of Greater Philadelphia, Ltd. (“Retina”), and two of its physicians—its President, Jonathan B. Belmont, M.D. and Vice President, Robert C. Kleiner, M.D. (together, “Retina Physicians”)—appeal from the order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of

568 F.3d 506 (2009) In the Matter of: ELDERCARE PROPERTIES LTD., Debtor. Valley Educational Foundation, Inc., Appellant, v. Eldercare Properties Ltd., Appellee. In the Matter of: Eldercare Properties Ltd., Debtor. Eldercare Properties Ltd., Appellant, v. Valley Educational Foundation, Inc., Appellee. Nos. 07-41057, 08-40244. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides *21In this commercial litigation case, appellants Sky View at Las Palmas, LLC ("Sky View") and Ilan Israely assert that: (1) they are entitled to a settlement credit to offset the jury's verdict of $2,665,832.72, plus pre-and post-judgment interest, under the one-satisfaction rule;

616 F.3d 1086 (2010) VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania insurance company; Zurich American Insurance, successor in interest to Zurich Insurance Company (U.S. Branch), Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LTD., d/b/a O'Hara Regional Center for Rehabilitation; ORCR, Inc., d/b/a O'Hara Regional Center for Rehabilitation; Solomon Health Management, LLC, d/b/a Solomon Health Services, LLC; Hersch "Ari"

OPINION GEMMILL, Judge; ¶ 1 Gary and Bobbie Solomon, husband and wife, and Sol’s Construction Co. (collectively “Solomon”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment imposing indemnity liability in favor of Jason and Shannon Hatch, husband and wife, and Hatch Development, LLC (collectively “Hatch”). For the following reasons, we affirm.

FILED April 5, 2024 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate 2024 IL App (4th) 230366 Court