⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Vanessa Gonzalez and Michael Gonzalez”

People v. Gonzalezpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2023-01-20 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/20/23 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, B315921 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA072648) v. BENJAMIN GONZALEZ et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court for the County of Los
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-06-22 · Published · cited 47× · 2 F.4th 871
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-06-22 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
United States District Court · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 11× · 318 F. Supp. 3d 461
DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are twelve (1) Motions to Dismiss and one (1) separate Motion to Joinder: (1) Defendant Banco Popular's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket No. 96); (2) Defendant Scotiabank's Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 99); (3) Firstbank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 103); (4) Motion to Dismiss F
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2008-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00075-CR Jason GONZALEZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-05-13 · Published · cited 5× · 122 N.Y.S.3d 667; 183 A.D.3d 748; 2020 NY Slip Op 2798
Matter of Eternity S. (Vanessa P.) (2020 NY Slip Op 02798) Matter of Eternity S. (Vanessa P.) 2020 NY Slip Op 02798 Decided on May 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2012-08-24 · Published · cited 1× · 477 B.R. 257
Amended Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 51] JOHN K. OLSON, Bankruptcy Judge. This Matter came before the Court on April 17, 2012 upon the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants, Paul R. Waters, Kyle Christopher, Department of Business and Professional Regulation of the State of Florida, and Construction Industry Licensing Board of the State of Florida. On June 11, 2012, Marsha Paola
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-09-25 · Published · cited 2× · 285 F. Supp. 2d 357; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18041; 2003 WL 22225782
285 F.Supp.2d 357 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Esteban GONZALEZ, Defendant. No. 94 CR. 134(WK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 25, 2003. *358 Jeremy H. Temkin, Mary Jo White, U.S. Atty. Criminal Div., New York City, for U.S. George R. Goltzer, Goltzer & Adler, New York City, Alexander Eis
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 88× · 772 F.3d 1335; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21685; 2014 WL 6235917
Case: 12-15738 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 26 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15738 ________________________ D.C.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022-07-06 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 6, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-950 Lower Tribunal No. 13-474 CC ________________ United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 746 F.3d 1273; 2014 WL 1284907; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 5984
Case: 12-15738 Date Filed: 04/01/2014 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15738 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cv-22
California Court of Appeal · 2015-09-25 · Published · cited 0× · 240 Cal. App. 4th 722; 192 Cal. Rptr. 3d 864; 2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 831; 2015 WL 5656124
Opinion HITCHING, Acting P. J. INTRODUCTION Article XIII, section 28 of the California Constitution imposes a tax of 2.35 percent on the amount of gross premiums received each year by “each insurer *727 doing busin
Arcia v. Detznerpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 908 F. Supp. 2d 1276; 2012 WL 6212564; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176463
ORDER WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion For Entry Of Judgment (DE 113) and pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation made in Court at the Status Conference held on October 22, 2012. The Court has carefully reviewed said Motion and Stipulation, the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court notes that as to the i
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2010-04-29 · Published · cited 13× · 429 B.R. 570; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1431; 2010 WL 1741105
429 B.R. 570 (2010) In re INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC., Introgen Technical Services, Inc., Debtors. Nos. 08-12442-CAG, 08-12443-CAG. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division. April 29, 2010. *573 Andrew S. Brown, Patricia Baron Tomasco, Vanessa E. Gonzalez, Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C., Austin, TX, for Debtor.
Barna v. Travispublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001-02-02 · Published · cited 50× · 239 F.3d 169; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1491
239 F.3d 169 (2nd Cir. 2001) JAMES BARNA & JASON B. NICHOLAS, for themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BRION D. TRAVIS, Chairperson, New York State Division of Parole, VANESSA CLARKE, GEORGE E. KING, S. EARL EICHELBERGER, LEO S. LEVY, MARIETTA GAILOR, ANTHONY UMINA, MARIA RIVERA BUCHANAN, IRENE PLATT, LAWRENCE IBSEN, HENRI RAFFALLI, SEAN R. MCSHERRY, GABRIEL PAGAN, DANIEL TAUREILLO, VERONICA
Miranda v. Mukaseypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 303 F. App'x 384
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Rodriguez Miranda, his wife Gabriela Avila-Peralta, and their three children, Isabel Rodriguez, Mariana Rodri*385guez, and Gabriel Leyva-Avila, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal. We have jur
Miranda v. Mukaseypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 303 F. App'x 384
MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Rodriguez Miranda, his wife Gabriela Avila-Peralta, and their three children, Isabel Rodriguez, Mariana Rodri*385guez, and Gabriel Leyva-Avila, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal. We have jur