⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

5 opinions for “Vanhouten, III v. U.S. Department of Education”

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986-12-09 · Published · cited 113× · 69 B.R. 155; 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 4831
69 B.R. 155 (1986) ACOLYTE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al, Defendants. Misc. No. 86-0329. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. December 9, 1986. *156 *157 Pinks, Brooks Stern & Arbeit, Steven G. Pinks, Hauppauge, N.Y., for debtor. McGoey &a;
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019-05-02 · Published · cited 4× · 377 F. Supp. 3d 844
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendant Columbus State Community College's ("Columbus State") Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46 ), Plaintiff Dr. Julie Raadschelders' ("Dr. Raadschelders") Memorandum in Opposition (ECF No. 49 ), and Columbus State's Reply (ECF No. 50 ). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS in PART and <
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-07-05 · Published · cited 36× · 489 F.3d 325; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15934; 2007 WL 1932255
BEAM, Circuit Judge. Adrian Minnis pled guilty to three counts: (1) conspiracy to distribute and possess with the intent to distribute heroin, cocaine, and crack cocaine (Count 1); (2) possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine (Count 2); and (3) civil forfeiture in the amount of $25,340 (Count 13). Minnis now appeals claiming error in various pretrial rulings and sentenci
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007-07-05 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-3215 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for
District Court, S.D. New York · 1974-05-09 · Published · cited 17× · 376 F. Supp. 369; 1974 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8611
376 F.Supp. 369 (1974) Anthony B. SUROWITZ, Plaintiff, v. The NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, and Arthur Van Houten, Executive Director, the New York City Employees' Retirement System, Defendants. No. 73 Civ. 4430 (MP). United States District Court, S. D. New York. May 9, 1974. *370 Samuel Resnicoff, New York City, fo