Cases

559 F.Supp.2d 1374 (2008) The POMEROY COLLECTION, LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 08-57. Court No. 05-00103. United States Court of International Trade. May 27, 2008. *1377 Fitch, King and Caffentzis, New York City (Peter J. Fitch), for Plaintiff. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General;

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1821 IN THE MATTER OF: NAVISTAR MAXXFORCE ENGINES MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION APPEAL OF: DRASC, INC., and S&C TRUCKS OF WINKLEPLECK, LTD. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Distr

Hon. M. James Lorenz, United States District Judge In this putative class action alleging deceptive food labeling, Defendants1 filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff opposed, and Defendants replied. The Court decides this matter on the briefs without oral argument.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Jay Zola and Jeremiah Joseph Lowney (collectively, Zola), Tyler Verdieck, and Michael Sarbacker filed separate class-action complaints against TD Ameritrade, Inc., alleging various state-law claims. 1 The *922

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1489 WEC 98C-3 LLC, Plaintiff, and 4 STRATFORD SQUARE MALL HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. SFA HOLDINGS INC., formerly known as SAKS INC.,

USCA11 Case: 19-13639 Date Filed: 11/16/2020 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13639 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-01707-TCB DONRICH YOUNG, Plaintiff

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. The statute of limitations for a wrongful levy action cannot begin until there has been a levy that attaches to the property at issue. In this case, notices of levy in 2012 did not constitute levies on royalties generated after the notices were served. For the reasons set forth below, the statute of limitations does not bar Gold Forever's wrongful levy action. A

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2206 ___________________________ MPAY Inc. Plaintiff - Appellant v. Erie Custom Computer Applications, Inc.; PayDay USA, Inc.; Payroll World, Inc.; Pro

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GREENVILLE CENTER SC, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. N21C-02-094-FWW ) v. ) ) YOUR DENTISTRY TODAY, INC., ) ) Defendant. )

Filed 9/24/24 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO LUIS VALDOVINOS, et al., B324418 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC633283) v. ORDER MODIFYING KIA

Justice SOTOMAYOR, dissenting. I join Justice GINSBURG's dissent in full and Part II of Justice KAGAN's dissent.1 This Court went wrong years ago in concluding that a "shift from bilateral arbitration to class-action arbitration" imposes such "fundamental changes," Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp. ,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3190 PROTECT OUR PARKS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PETE BUTTIGIEG, Secretary of Transportation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the Unite

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1707 HOLSUM DE PUERTO RICO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ITW FOOD EQUIPMENT GROUP LLC, d/b/a Peerless Food Equipment, Defendant-Appellant, COMPASS INDUSTRIAL GROUP, LLC; INSURANCE COMPANY ABC; ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC.; INSURANCE COMPANY DEF; INSURANCE COMPANY XYZ,

Filed 8/29/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO LUIS VALDOVINOS et al., B324418 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC633283) v. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., Defendant and Appellant. APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los A

OPINION AND ORDER Seibel, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 32.) For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED. I. Background A. Facts For purposes of this motion, the Court accepts as true the facts, but not the conclusions, alleged by Plaintiff in the Second Amended Compl

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge In this class action, plaintiffs Jackie Fitzhenry-Russell and Gegham Margaryan allege *1114defendants Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. and Canada Dry Mott's Inc.1 defrauded California consumers by marketing their Canada Dry Ginger Ale ("Canada Dry") as "Made from Real Gi

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMES RIVEST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0848-PWG ) HAUPPAUGE DIGITAL, INC., ) ) Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 28) Hon. Janis L. Sammartino, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is Defendants Wright Brothers, Inc.’s, Corey Wright’s, and Casey Wright’s Motion to *1091Dismiss First Amended Complaint, (“MTD,” ECF No. 28). Also before th

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19-2581 & 19-2741 ANN BELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ ANN BELL, et al.,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 19-2581 & 19-2741 ANN BELL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ ANN BELL, et al.,