Cases

451 F.3d 1105 Mauricio VARGAS, Petitioner,v.DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; Mario Ortiz, Interim District Director, in his official capacity only; Executive Office of Immigration Review; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, Respondents. No. 05-9581. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 21, 2006.

*1106 HARTZ, Circuit Judge. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), “[a]ny alien who is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission is deportable.” The term aggravated felony encompasses, among other things, “sexual abuse of ■ a • minor.” . 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A).

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination. Vera-Villegas

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions for review, Alfredo Cambrón Vargas and Inez Enriquez Torres, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying their two motions to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and de n

MEMORANDUM ** Nancy Edith Alfonso Vargas, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Lim v. INS,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL CENTER, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:23-cv-119 (TNM) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Several Chinese nationals invest

MEMORANDUM ** Nancy Edith Alfonso Vargas, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Lim v. INS,

MEMORANDUM ** Pursuant to this court’s decision in Ruben Reyes-Torres v. Holder, 645 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2011), the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Board for proceedings consistent with that opinion. REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent ex

MEMORANDUM ** Hector Salvador Mendez-Vargas petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen as untimely and for failure to es*734tablish prejudice arising from the alleged ineffective assistance of his original lawyer, Thomas Mix. We grant the petition for review. Mendez-Vargas enter

MEMORANDUM ** Francisco Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical presence determination. Vera-Villegas

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated petitions for review, Alfredo Cambrón Vargas and Inez Enriquez Torres, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying their two motions to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and de n

MEMORANDUM ** Sergio A. Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Except as otherwise stated, we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

MEMORANDUM *** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The te

MEMORANDUM ** Abelino Diaz Vargas and Angelica Maria Carbajal Dimas, natives and citizens of *687Mexico, petition for review of two Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders, one affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying cancellation of removal (No. 05-72027), and one denying their motion to reopen (No. 05-73616). We have jurisdiction

MEMORANDUM ** Valentin Galan Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA di

MEMORANDUM ** Ramon Godoy Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance without opinion of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary hardship determination. See Rom

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Miranda-Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying, as untimely filed, his motion to reopen the underlying denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Petitioner has waived any challenge to the BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen by failing to raise any arguments related to

MEMORANDUM ** Arnulfo Gonzalez Vargas and Letiticia Jimenez Gonzalez (“petitioners”), husband and wife, and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying as untimely their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, see Iturribarr

*989MEMORANDUM ** Fernando Pelcastre Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the denial of an application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b), and we deny the petition. The Illegal Immigration Reform

MEMORANDUM ** Armando Vargas-Avila, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applica*237tion for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.