Cases

984 A.2d 460 (2009) 410 N.J. Super. 108 Andrew FAUCETT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Darianna VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. A-2945-08T1. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 15, 2009. Decided December 17, 2009. *461 Jonathan D. Gordon argued, Teaneck, the caus

The opinion of the court was delivered by MESSANO, J.A.D. This case presents a question of first impression in this State. In particular, must a parent seeking modification of a court order regarding custody of her child bear the threshold burden of establishing “changed circumstances that affect the welfare of the child[,]” Hand v. Hand, 391 N.J.Super. 102, 105, 917 A.2d 269 (App.Div.2007)

FISHER, J., dissenting: I respectfully dissent. Seattle Fishing Services LLC (“SFS”) properly alleged facts demonstrating that its constitutional rights were violated and that this violation took place under color of state law. Moreover, even if SFS’ complaint was technically deficient, the appropriate disposition of the case would be dismissal with leave to amend. The majority correctly ident

OPINION IRENAS, District Judge. Presently before the Court is the application of the Bergen County Utilities Authority *508(“BCUA”) requesting us to vacate a state court temporary restraining order which directs it to continue making payments to the Union County Utilities Authority (“UCUA”) pursuant to the “put-or-pay” provisions of a solid waste d

995 F.Supp. 506 (1998) The UNION COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY, a Public Body Corporate and Politic of the State of New Jersey, and Ogden Martin Systems of Union, Inc. (Intervenor), Plaintiffs, v. The BERGEN COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY, a Public Body Corporate and Politic of the State of New Jersey, and The County of Bergen, New Jersey, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 97-6126(JEI).

56 F.3d 71NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dennis C. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Daniel B. VASQUEZ, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16721. United States Court

KILKENNY, District Judge. Appellant has appealed from a judgment of conviction of the crime of possession of marijuana on which he is serving a sentence of five years imprisonment imposed in the District Court in San Diego on May 22. 1 The sole assignment of error is that the

194 F.3d 426 (3rd Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,v.STATE OF NEW JERSEY; NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL; EUGENE MCCAFFREY; RONALD BURKHARDTDONNA ROMAN; MARY VASQUEZ; CECILIA A. SHINN; CARRIE E. REED,v.NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF PERSONNEL; CITY OF NEWARKARMADINA TAHANEY,v.NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL; MERIT SYSTEM BOARDState of New Jersey; New Jersey State Department of Personnel; and

ORDER AND RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS STEFAN R. UNDERHILL, District Judge. This case arises from the State of Connecticut’s arrest and prosecution of the pro *68se plaintiff, .Harold Turner,.after he published to his website commentary denouncing two Connecticut legislators for then-purported role in “infring

John G. Koeltl, United States District Judge This case concerns alleged legal and constitutional errors that the petitioner, Andrew Yearwood, claims occurred when Immigrations and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") agents removed him from the United States to St. Vincent and the Grenadines ("St. Vincent") on May 22, 2019. The petitioner brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under

JUSTICE TIMPONE delivered the opinion of the Court. **587*963In this case, the Court considers whether the State must prove actual harm to a child to convict a defendant under N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a), endangering the welfare of children. Because the trial cour

73 N.J. 206 (1977) 374 A.2d 20 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. LEONEL CANOLA, A/K/A LEON VASQUEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued September 27, 1976. Decided April 7, 1977. *207 Mr. Edward P. Hannigan, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANDREW MATTIODA, No. 22-15889 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:20-cv- v. 03662-SVK CLARENCE WILLIAM NELSON II; NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND OPINION SPACE ADMINISTRATION, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States Distric

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendant Bladimir Rigo (“Rigo” or “Defendant”) sought and obtained a hearing under United States v. Fatico to contest the amount of loss attributable to him pursuant to his guilty plea to one count of Conspiracy to Commit Healthcare Fraud and one count of Conspiracy to Commit Adulteration Offenses and the Unlawful Wholesale Distribution of Prescription D

985 A.2d 1239 (2010) 200 N.J. 580 Wilman PINTO and Alvaro Vasquez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SPECTRUM CHEMICALS AND LABORATORY PRODUCTS and Spectrum Chemical Manufacturing Corporation, Defendants-Respondents. A-94 September Term 2008 Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued October 13, 2009. Decided January 21, 2010.

ORDER DENYING FACEBOOK’S MOTION TO DISMISS THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge On August 9, 2016, Facebook filed a motion to dismiss Brickman’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). ECF No. 50. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1, Facebook also filed a Notice of Constitutional Question to the Attorney General of the United States. ECF No. 51. And pursuant to Fed. R. Ci

Filed 1/2/15; pub. order 1/29/15 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT RAND MACQUIDDY, B251752 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC488675) v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, L

770 F.Supp.2d 1128 (2011) Patricia ALLFREY and David Allfrey, a married couple, Plaintiffs, v. Ray MABUS, Secretary of the Department of the Navy, Department of the Navy, and the United States of America, Defendants. Case No. 09-5793RJB. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma. January 27, 2011. *1130 William Mic

JUSTICE ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal, we must determine whether a volunteer emergency medical technician (EMT), working for a private, nonprofit rescue squad that receives municipal funding to provide service in a township, is a “public servant” under the official-misconduct statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2(a).

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr