Cases

54 F.Supp.2d 688 (1999) Doyle VAUGHN v. GULF COPPER, et al. No. 1:98 CV 1617. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. June 9, 1999. *689 George Michael Jamail, Reaud Morgan & Quinn, Beaumont, TX, Craig Victor Depew, Clark Depew & Siess, Houston, TX, for plaintiff. John Robert Walker, Brown Sims

534 S.E.2d 403 (2000) 207 W.Va. 538 William R. DEAN, et al., Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. TOWN OF ADDISON, Defendant Below, Appellant. No. 27463. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted June 13, 2000. Decided July 10, 2000. *404 William W. Talbott, Esq., Webster Springs, West

Hines, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case, as I do not believe this appeal is properly before this Court. Nor can I agree with the new provisions of law on appellate jurisdiction which the majority announces today. This case involves the grant of a declaratory judgment and mandamus relief after developer E. T. Carlyle Company challenged the vali

This is a child custody modification case. Bobbie Dale Vaughn and Kenneth D. Vaughn were divorced in 1974. The parties had one minor child, Kevin Andrew *Page 156 Vaughn, who was seven years old at the time of the divorce. Custody of Kevin was given to the mother with the father being allowed substantial visitation rights. Both parties continued to reside in Jefferson County, and as a result the father was able to visit his child wee

Filed 1/4/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE MARCUS VAUGHN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, A164053 v. TESLA, INC., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG17882082) Defendant and Appellant.

[Cite as State v. Vaughn, 2019-Ohio-5005.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-18-1142 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0201801236 v. Cameron Winston Vaughn DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

321 Ga. 836 FINAL COPY S25A0104. DEAN v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al. ELLINGTON, Justice. Thomas G. Dean, representing himself, appeals from the dismissal of his challenge to the qualifications of candidates in the 2022 partisan election for the office of Georgia Labor Commissioner. Because he did not bring this challenge until after he had lost the Democratic primary election, and thus he failed to do everything within his power to have his claims decided before the elec

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, United States District Judge1 1. INTRODUCTION Jeffrey Mark Dean (“Dean”) brought this action challenging the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner” or the “Agency”) denying his application for a period of disability, disability insurance, and Supplemental Security Incom

722 S.E.2d 436 (2012) 313 Ga. App. 726 DEAN v. The STATE. No. A11A2387. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 26, 2012. *437 Jonathan Perry Waters, for appellant. Howard Zachary Simms, Dist. Atty., Pamela Y. White-Colbert, John Allen Regan, Gregory Warren Winters, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

Matter of Deanna E. R. (Latisha M.) (2019 NY Slip Op 00883) Matter of Deanna E. R. (Latisha M.) 2019 NY Slip Op 00883 Decided on February 6, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Rep

Richard G. Kopf, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs' Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Filing 700) and Plaintiffs' Motion for Review of the Clerk's Denial of Plaintiffs' Bill of Costs (Filing 713).1 I. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees2 On June 11, 2018, judgment was ente

03/17/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 9, 2020 Session JONATHAN KING, ET AL. v. DEAN CHASE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 16-0030-BC Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor ___________

ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Plaintiff Heidi Maher’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [# 17], Defendants Vaughn, Silver-berg & Associates, LLP and Austin IVF, LLP (Defendants)’s Response [# 19], Maher’s Reply [# 27], Defendants’ SurReply [# 31], and Maher’s Sur-Reply [# 41];

EASLEY, Justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. Clarence Vaughn, Jr., filed a complaint for preliminary injunction, permanent injunction, accounting, appointment of receiver, damages and other relief against John C. Rettig, Jr., in the First Judicial District of the Chancery Court of Harrison County, Mississippi. Mark B. Strickland was substituted to act as Vaughn’s attorney. After obtaining leave to amend, Vaughn filed a

202 S.W.3d 106 (2006) James A. VAUGHN v. STATE of Tennessee. Rearno Vaughn v. State of Tennessee. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. June 8, 2006 Session. September 15, 2006. *109 Cynthia Hall Templeton, Gallatin, Tennessee, for the appellant, James A. Vaughn. *110 Br

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEAN PHILLIP CARTER, No. 13-99003 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:06-cv-04532-RGK RON DAVIS, Warden, San Quentin State Prison, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presidi

367 F.Supp.2d 1305 (2005) Donja VAUGHN, Plaintiff, v. Margaret KREHBIEL, Robert Krehbiel, Joel Stevenson, and Gary Shoun, Defendants. No. 04-MK-1358 (CBS). United States District Court, D. Colorado. April 11, 2005. *1306 Donja Vaughn, Cortez, CO, Pro se. ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS KRIEGER,

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 127 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2022 October 11, 2022 TIMOTHY DEAN LENERS, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-22-0093 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff).

NO. 12-20-00114-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS DWIGHT DEAN ROSAMOND, § APPEAL FROM THE APPELLANT V. § COUNTY COURT AT LAW THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § VAN ZANDT COUNTY,

MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendant Dean Transportation, Inc. (“DTI”) has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 32), to which the plaintiff, James Finn, has filed a Response in opposition (Docket No. 34), and DTI filed a Reply (Docket No. 39).1 Finn has also filed a Moti