Cases

OPINION GONZALEZ, Justice. In this case, we are presented with the issue of whether a child has a right to recover damages for loss of consortium and mental anguish when a parent is injured but not killed by the tortious conduct of a third party. The court of appeals, stating that it did not have the authority to recognize such a cause of action,1 modified the judgment of the tri

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1952 GAVIN GRIMM, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant – Appellant. ----------------------------- NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, INC.; INTERACT: ADVOCATES FOR INTERSEX YOUTH;

BERDON, J., with whom KATZ, J., joins, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with and join in parts I, II and III of the majority opinion, but I disagree with part IV concerning the rejection of the claim for loss of consortium (sometimes referred to as the loss of society and companionship of a parent)1 by a minor child resulting from a serious injury to the child’s parent. The majori

27 F.Supp.2d 754 (1998) N.W. ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-97-0196. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 18, 1998. As Amended June 9, 1998. Opinion Supplementing Decision on Reconsideration, June 11, 1998.[*] Additional Sup

160 Ariz. 474 (1989) 774 P.2d 213 Vivian VILLAREAL, mother and guardian of Rachel Leah Garcia, Gregory Jesse Garcia, Pamela Jeanette Garcia, Anthony Conrad Garcia, minor children of Gregory J. Garcia; and Mellissa Ann Garcia, adult child of Gregory J. Garcia, an incapacitated person, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Arizona, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendants-Appellees. Raul NEWMAN and Donna Newman, his wife, and R

FEATHERSTON, Judge; Respondent determined a deficiency in the amount of $13,570,174.98 in the estate tax for the Estate of Euil S. Spruill and an addition to tax under section 6653(b)2 in the amount of $6,785,087.49. Also, respondent determined deficiencies in the individual petitioners’ 1981 Federal income taxes as follows:

408 F.Supp. 765 (1976) Craig AMOS et al., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF SCHOOL DIRECTORS OF the CITY OF MILWAUKEE et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 65-C-173. United States District Court, E. D. Wisconsin. January 19, 1976. *766 *767 *768

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Cooler heads regrettably did not prevail on the afternoon that Tyrone Cefalu arrived at his parents’ printing business and found Elk Grove Village police officer Eric Perkins parked in the drive, filling out reports and monitoring traffic on the adjoining roadway. Cefalu in rather harsh terms told Perkins to leave, Perkins balked, and within mo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 11–0892 Filed February 15, 2013 KIMBERLY ANN SALLEE, Individually and as Next Friend of LUCAS GREGORY DURKOP and MARIA CHRISTINA RIVERA, MATTHEW JAMES SALLEE, and JAMES ALLAN SALLEE, Appellants, vs. MATTHEW R. STEWART and DIANA STEWART d/b/a STEWARTLAND HOLSTEINS, Appellees. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Cou

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 77 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 78 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

352 B.R. 848 (2006) In re Neil SNOWDEN, Debtor. Neil Snowden, S., Plaintiff, v. Litton Loan Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 05 B 57906, Adversary No. 06 A 01181. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 11, 2006. *849 *850 Pat

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

JUSTICE McKINNON, dissenting. ¶49 The Court begins from the proposition that “ ‘judicial modification of the common law is sometimes required to prevent great injustice or to insure the common law is consonant with the changing needs of society.’” Opinion, ¶ 21 (quoting Miller v. Fallon Cnty., 222 Mont. 214, 217-18, 721 P.2d 342, 344 (1986)). This is a noble

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PARENTS FOR PRIVACY; JON GOLLY; No.18-35708 KRIS GOLLY, individually and as guardians ad litem for A.G.; NICOLE D.C. No. LILLIE; MELISSA GREGORY, CV 17-1813 HZ individually and as guardian ad litem for T.F.; PARENTS RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, an Oregon nonprofit OPINION corporation; LINDSAY GOLLY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v

OPINION KNOPF, Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment by the Simpson Circuit Court dismissing a complaint seeking recovery for loss of parental consortium. We agree with the trial court that Kentucky does not recognize a cause of action for loss of parental consortium brought by emancipated adult children of the decedent. Hence, we affirm. The underlying facts of this acti

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

Chief Justice PHILLIPS delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Justice HECHT, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, Justice SMITH and Justice WAINWRIGHT, and joined by Justice O’NEILL, Justice JEFFERSON, and Justice SCHNEIDER in all Parts except Part II. In these consolidated cases involving two separate appeals in a medical malpractice action, we must decide an issue of first impressi

Moyer, C.J. In a recent decision of this court, we noted that it was not yet the propitious time to review the issue of whether a child may maintain a cause of action for loss of parental consortium against a tortfeasor who negligently or intentionally injures the child’s parent. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 84, 94, 585 N.E.2d 384, 393. Now is such time. Appellants urge us to recognize a cause of action

279 S.W.3d 93 (2008) HYMAN & ARMSTRONG, P.S.C., et al., Appellants, v. Ronald GUNDERSON (Administrator of the Estate of Mary Margaret Gunderson), et al., Appellees. and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation (n/k/a Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation), Appellants, v. Ronald Gunderson (Administrator of the Estate of Mary Margaret Gunderson), et al., Appellees. Nos. 2006-SC-000175-DG, 2006-SC-000179-DG. <

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 98-2708, 98-3053 WILLIAM CEFALU and TYRONE CEFALU, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. VILLAGE OF ELK GROVE, et al., Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 94 C 1990--Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Magistrate Judge./* Argued February 23, 1999--Decided April 13, 2000 Before COFFEY, RIPPLE, and ROVNER, Circuit Jud