Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Vazquez v. Duke”
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA LIZ VAZQUEZ, CHRIS DUKE, ) RANDY ELEDGE, STEVE STRAIT, ) Supreme Court No. S-18619 and KATHRYN WERDAH
Roberto Vazquez v. Maria Angelica Vazquezpublic domain
ACCEPTED 13-15-00306-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 10/20/2015 7:43:27 AM Dorian E. Ramirez
United States v. Vazquez-Ramirezpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3544 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00087- RMP-1 v. OSCAR VAZQUEZ-RAMIREZ, OPINION Defendant - Appellant. Appeal f
State v. Vazquez-Escobarpublic domain
153 P.3d 168 (2007) 211 Or. App. 115 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Agustin VAZQUEZ-ESCOBAR, Defendant-Appellant. 031155488, A126694. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Record and Briefs October 31, 2006. Decided February 21, 2007. *169 Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director,
ACCEPTED 03-14-00629-CV 4796412 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Clark v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VAZQUEZ, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss, Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 66 (“First Motion”) [Doc. 26 in Civ. No. 12-1160; Doc. 23 in Civ. No. 12-1176], and the United States’ Motion and Memorandum to
Williams v. Puerto Ricopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is the motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”) filed by defendants Police Department, Department of Justice, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Puerto Rico Superior Court (collectively, “defendants”). (Docket No. 15.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ m
Talavera v. Municipalitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Defendants have filed two motions in limine before the Court. On March 2, 2011, defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude any physician testimony on the issue of damages. (Docket No. 87). Plaintiffs opposed defendants’ motion on August 26, 2011. (Docket No. 100.) On September 6, 2011, defendants filed another motion in limine to exc
United States v. Robert Lewispublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2549 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Robert Lewis
Benjamin v. AIG Insurancepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT (April 12, 2012) CABRET, Associate Justice. Fitzroy Williams was a full-time employee of the appellee, Esso Virgin Islands, Inc. (“Esso”) in 1994, when he vanished along with the plane in which he was traveling. Williams had a life insurance policy through Esso naming R.W., his minor son, as the sole beneficiary. After years of Esso’s refusal to pay on the life
State v. Churchpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Church, 2024-Ohio-2356.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 112224 and 113042 v. : TEMARCUS CHURCH,
Morrison v. Ocean State Jobbers, Inc.public domain
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DECERTIFY FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION ALVIN W. THOMPSON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Omar Morrison, Manuel Toppins and Carli Galasso, move for certification of two classes: the first class consisting of all persons who have worked for the defendant, Ocean State Jobbers, Inc. (“Ocean State”), as an Assistant Manager (“ASM”)
James Russell Johnson v. State of Floridapublic domain
USCA11 Case: 20-13301 Date Filed: 04/28/2022 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-13301 ____________________ JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus STATE OF FLORIDA,
United States v. Allmonpublic domain
500 F.3d 800 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derek Isaac ALLMON, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-2699. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 12, 2007. Filed: August 27, 2007. *802 *801 *803
United States v. Shortpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Brian G. SHORT, Sergeant United States Army, Appellant No. 17-0187 Crim. App. No. 20150320 Argued October 24, 2017 —Decided Ja
Schwebel v. Crandallpublic domain
McMahon, C.J.: Plaintiff Ronnit Schwebel brings this action, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. against Kristine Crandall, Acting Director of the Nebraska Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS"), and Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary of
Herrera v. Lovelace Health Systems, Inc.public domain
35 F.Supp.2d 1327 (1999) Carlos L. HERRERA, Plaintiff, v. LOVELACE HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., a New Mexico corporation, The Lovelace Institutes, Inc., a New Mexico professional corporation, and Bret L. LaPointe, M.D., Defendants. No. Civ. 98-1250 MV/LG. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. January 28, 1999. *1328 Bruce E. Past
United States v. Shortpublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Brian G. SHORT, Sergeant United States Army, Appellant No. 17-0187 Crim. App. No. 20150320 Argued October 24, 2017 —Decided Ja
United States v. Ellis Burrell, Billy J. Henry, Jon P. Hammonds, William D. Hatch, John Jones, and Steven E. Williamspublic domain
*980 BAUER, Chief Judge. The appellants are six defendants convicted of various narcotics and firearm offenses. They raise a barrage of challenges to their convictions and sentences. Finding no merit in these challenges, we affirm. I. Facts
Commonwealth v. Ngpublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-10476 COMMONWEALTH vs. YAT FUNG NG. Suffolk. October 13, 20