Cases

PICKETT, Judge. *70Tyson Foods, Inc. appeals the judgment of the Office of Workers' Compensation (OWC) finding that the court had subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate Frank Verret's claim against Tyson and the award of workers' compensation benefits to Mr. Verret. FACTS Mr. Verret, a

FAY, Circuit Judge: While in the midst of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan, plaintiff-appellant Brenda Robinson brought an employment discrimination claim against her former employer, defendant-appellee Tyson Foods. The district court granted summary judgment for Tyson Foods on the threshold issue of judicial estoppel. The court reasoned that because Robinson failed to disclose her employment discrimination suit to the bankruptc

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On June 28, 2011, Robert Briseno filed a complaint against ConAgra;1 between Oc*938tober and December 2011, the court consolidated several cases filed against ConA-gra under the caption above

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1657 NORTHWESTERN SELECTA, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. RAMÓN GONZÁLEZ-BEIRÓ, Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture; ALEX MUÑIZ-LASALLE, Deputy Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Agriculture Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

USCA11 Case: 21-13146 Document: 69-1 Date Filed: 07/11/2023 Page: 1 of 32 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13146 ____________________ MARLENE GREEN-COOP

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MANKIEWICZ COATINGS, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT K. MICHAEL MOORE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff Hawaiian Airlines, Ine.’s (“HAL”) and Defendant Mankiewicz Coatings, LLC’s (“Mankiewicz”) cross-motions for summary judgment. HAL moves for partial summary

MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY I.STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. Persons Relevant to the Suit. 1. The Parties. 2. Other Relevant Individuals. B. Background of the Key Players’ Employment With Synthes 1. Defendant Marotta

McMillian, Judge. In 2012, Shelia Lewis filed a putative class action against Knology, Inc. (“Knology”) and its former directors in the Superior Court of Troup County for breach of fiduciary duty and failing to disclose material information regarding a merger between Knology and WideOpenWest Finance, LLC (“WOW”). But at her deposition, Lewis testified that she thought that her lawsuit was pending in Delaware, she had never h

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2347 ___________________________ Riley Johannessohn; Daniel C. Badilla; James Kelley; Kevin R. Wonders; William Bates; James Pinion, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated Plaintiffs - Appellants

USCA11 Case: 20-11736 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-11736 ____________________ KEITH STANSELL, MARC GONSALVES, THOMAS HOWES, JUDITH JANIS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Greer Jan

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LAURIE A. HANNA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0228-KSJM ) ANDREW PARADISE, et al., ) ) Defendants, and ) ) SKILLZ INC.,

ORDER ANNE C. CONWAY, United States District Judge This cause comes before the Court on consideration of Janet Riffle’s (“Plaintiff’) Mo*679tion for Class Certification (Doc. No. 67), Defendants Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. and LVNV Funding LLC’s (collectively “Defendants”) Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 75), and Plaintiffs Reply (Doc. No. 79). F

ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT are Defendant’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Dkt. 62) and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts III, VII, and VIII (Dkt. 63). Each party responded in opposition to the other’s motion (Dkts. 87, 88). Upon consideration, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED in part. Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. Defendant’s

Jeffrey T. Gilbert, Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Jason Pietrzycki ("Pietrzycki"), on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, has sued Defendant Heights Tower Service, Inc. ("HTS") and Defendant Mark Motter ("Motter") (collectively, "Defendants") for allegedly underpaying some of HTS's employees for overtime in violation of the Illinois Minimum Wage Law ("the IMWL"),

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: In this action, Plaintiffs, Michael McGlone, on behalf of himself individually and others similarly situated, allege that Defendants, Contract Callers, Inc. (“CCI”), Michael Maguire, and William “Tim” Wertz, violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), §§ 650 et seq. <

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. This Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [Doe. 123]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the court deny Defendant Screening Reports Inc.’s (“SRI”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 85] in substantial part, but grant it as to one of Plaintiffs claims under 15 U.

794 F.Supp.2d 1277 (2011) Donna BUTTS, Plaintiff, v. AMERIPATH, INC. and Ameripath Florida, LLC, Defendants. Case No. 09-61446-CIV-ZLOCH. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. March 30, 2011. *1279 Dion J. Cassata, Cassata & Hanson PL, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Plaintiff. Hilda Piloto, Arnstein & Lehr, Kevin E

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Mandy Liles brought this action against C.S. McCrossan, Inc. and C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. (collectively “CSM”) asserting a number of civil rights claims. The district court 1 granted CSM’s motion for summary judgment and Liles appealed. We affirm. I. Background

ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 93) filed by Plaintiffs, Jason Herman, William Cohen, Joey Kratt, and Christina Lancaster, the Response in opposition thereto (Dkt. 99) filed by Defendant, SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”), and the Supplement (Dkt. 115) filed by Plaintiffs;