Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Vega-Jimenez v. Mullin”
Concurrence by Judge Owens WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: *485It is no hyperbole to say that Dulce Garcia embodies the American dream. Born into poverty, Garcia and her parents shared a San Diego house with other families to save money on rent; she was even homeless for a time as a child. But she studied hard and excelled academical
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
E. E. V. v. Todd W. Blanchepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-2256 & 25-2268 E.E.V. and M.C.C.-G., Petitioners, v. TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ On Petitions f
United States v. Reyespublic domain
384 F.Supp.2d 926 (2005) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. Alirio REYES and Osmin Heriberto Alfaro-Fuentes, Defendants. No. 1:04CR381. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 29, 2005. Morris R. Parker, Jr., Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff. Alan H. Yamamoto, Alexandria, VA, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPIN
Uc Regents v. Usdhspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY No. 18-15068 OF CALIFORNIA; JANET NAPOLITANO, in her official D.C. No. capacity as President of the 3:17-cv-05211-WHA University of California, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security,
State Ex Rel. King v. Lyonspublic domain
248 P.3d 878 (2011) 2011-NMSC-004 STATE of New Mexico ex rel. Gary K. KING, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico, Petitioner, v. Patrick H. LYONS, Commissioner of Public Lands, Respondent. No. 32,197. Supreme Court of New Mexico. January 24, 2011. *881 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Seth T. Cohen,
Maestas v. Hallpublic domain
274 P.3d 66 (2012) 2012-NMSC-006 Antonio MAESTAS and Brian Franklin Egolf, Jr., members of the New Mexico House of Representatives, and June Lorenzo, Alvin Warren, Eloise Gift and Henry Ochoa, Petitioners, v. Hon. James A. HALL, District Judge Pro Tempore of the First Judicial District Court, Respondent, and Susana Martinez, in her capacity as Governor of New Mexico, et al., Real Parties in Interest, and Maurilio C
M. C. C.-G. v. Todd W. Blanchepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-2256 & 25-2268 E.E.V. and M.C.C.-G., Petitioners, v. TODD W. BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ On Petitions f
Roman v. Delgado Altieripublic domain
390 F.Supp.2d 94 (2005) Alcides Roman ROMAN, et al., Plaintiffs v. Carlos O. DELGADO ALTIERI, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1544 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 5, 2005. *95 *96 *97 *98
Kelly v. West Cash & Carry Bldg. Materialspublic domain
745 So.2d 743 (1999) Burnetta KELLY v. WEST CASH & CARRY BUILDING MATERIALS STORE, et al. No. 99-CA-0102. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. October 20, 1999. *747 Ford & Harrison, John L. Monroe, Jr., John L. Telford, Jr., Atlanta, Georgia, and Burke & Mayer, William B. Hildalgo, New Orleans, Louisiana, Co
*46ORDER Steven J. McAuliffe, United States District Judge This consolidated, multi-district litigation is brought by consumers in Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated consumers in those states. Plaintiffs say that defendant, The Dial Corporation (“Dial”), cont
In Re Toyota Motor Corp.public domain
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
In re: Dial Complete Marketingpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In re: Dial Complete Marketing Case No. 11-md-2263-SM and Sales Practices Litigation Opinion No. 2015 DNH 222 O R D E R This consolidated, multi-district litigation is brought by consumers in Arkansas, California, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, on behalf of themselves and similarly situated consumers in those st