⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

15 opinions for “Velasquez v. Wyeth”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-04-03 · Published · cited 29× · 955 F.3d 336
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 19-1250 ______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WAYNE A.G. JAMES, Appellant ______________ Appeal from the District Court for the Virgin Islands (No. 3:15-c
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 948 F.3d 638
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 19-1250 ______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WAYNE A.G. JAMES, Appellant ______________ Appeal from the District Court for the Virgin Islands (No. 3:15-cr-00042
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022-02-23 · Published · cited 37× · 26 F.4th 536
19-4110 United States v. Zhong In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 19-4110 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DAN ZHONG, Defendant-Appellant.*
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-10-05 · Published · cited 35× · 50 F.4th 498
Case: 21-40680 Document: 00516498357 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 5, 2022 N
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 25-4282 Doc: 104 Filed: 07/02/2026 Pg: 1 of 38 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-4282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SHRONDA COVINGTON, Defendant – Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 25-4283 Doc: 100 Filed: 07/02/2026 Pg: 1 of 38 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-4282 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SHRONDA COVINGTON, Defendant – Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-03-22 · Published · cited 34× · 636 F.3d 172; 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,143; 190 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2589; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5847; 2011 WL 988876
636 F.3d 172 (2011) Derek CARDER, an Individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Mark Bolleter, an Individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Drew Daugherty, an Individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Andrew Kissinger, an Individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defen
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-07-30 · Published · cited 0× · 294 F. Supp. 2d 667; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15479
MEMORANDUM AND PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 2946 BARTLE, District Judge. Before the court are the motions of plaintiffs in Weaver, et al. v. American Home Products Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 03-20153, Neason, et al. v. American Home Products Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 03-20154, Carter, et al. v. American Home Products Corp., et al., Civ. A. No. 03-20158, Parker, et al. v. A
District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-12-13 · Published · cited 14× · 914 F. Supp. 2d 281; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176836; 2012 WL 6212658
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MATSUMOTO, District Judge: On April 30, 2012, a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Zinoviy Levitant (“plaintiff’) on a retaliation claim against his former employer, the City of New York Human Resources Administration (“defendant” or “NYCHRA”), pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), awarding plainti
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-03-31 · Published · cited 149× · 13 F. Supp. 3d 179; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44993; 2014 WL 1330941
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Sylvia Bowen-Hooks brings the above-captioned action against Defendants City of New York, Commissioner David Frankel, Sheriff Lindsay Eason, Chief of Operations Timothy LaRose, First Deputy Sheriff Oliver Pu-Folkes and Chief of Staff Peter Sammarco, alleging claims of race and gender discrimination, retaliation
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Texas Supreme Court · 2002-10-31 · Published · cited 314× · 102 S.W.3d 675; 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 103; 2002 Tex. LEXIS 178; 2002 WL 31426407
Justice HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice OWEN, Justice ' JEFFERSON, and Justice RODRIGUEZ joined. Under Rule 42(b)(4) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the district court certified a nationwide class of some 20,000 purchasers of three dental practice management software products. There are members of this class in all fifty stat
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003-07-30 · Published · cited 24× · 294 F. Supp. 2d 667
294 F.Supp.2d 667 (2003) In re: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE, FENFLURAMINE, DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Katie Weaver, et al. v. American Home Products Corporation, Now Known as Wyeth Corporation, et al. Williette Neason, et al. v. American Home Products Corporation, Now Known as Wyeth Corporation, et al. Charlese Carter, et al. v. American Home Products Corporation, Now Known as Wyeth Corporation, et al.<
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams