Cases

Filed 8/5/14 Certified for publication 8/26/14 (order attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF VENTURA APPELLATE DIVISION CACH LLC, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JULIA C. MEZA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., Defendants and Respondents. S242799 Ninth Circuit 15-16900 Northern District of California 5:14-cv-03486-LHK February 15, 2019 Chief

STATEMENT OF DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANT CAVALRY SPV I, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Hon. John F. Walter, United States District Judge Having read and considered the papers and arguments of the parties, the Court finds and concludes as follows: 1. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND On January 4, 2011, plaintiff Javier Qui-roz (“Quiroz”) and his wife visited Santa Pau

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff William Ciganek, Jr., brings this putative class action case for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. ECF No. 1. Defendants Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”); Hunt & Henriques (“H&H”); Michael Scott Hunt; and Janalie Ann Hen

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 41, 59, 64, 66, 69 LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge Plaintiff Julia Meza brings this putative class action case for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. ECF No. 16. Defendants Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”); Hunt & Henriques (“H &

Filed 8/20/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF VENTURA APPELLATE DIVISION SIERRA MANAGED ASSET PLAN, LLC., ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) (Ventura County Superior Court Case

Per Curiam: *44BWP Media USA Inc., Pacific Coast News, and National Photo Group, LLC (collectively "BWP") appeal from a memorandum and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Ronnie Abrams, J. ) that granted summary judgment to Polyvore, Inc. ("Polyvore") on BWP's copyright claims for direct and

Accordingly, we solicited supplemental briefing concerning the proper interpretation of section 2702. In that briefing, all parties now concede that communications configured by the social media user to be public fall within section 2702(b)(3)'s lawful consent exception to section 2702's prohibition, and, as a result, may be disclosed by a provider. As we will explain, this concession is well taken in light of the r

16‐2825‐cv(L) BWP Media USA Inc. v. Polyvore, Inc. 1 2 In the 3 United States Court of Appeals 4 For the Second Circuit 5 ________ 6 7 AUGUST TERM, 2017 8 9 ARGUED: SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 10 DECID