Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Vermont Toy Works, Inc.”
135 B.R. 762 (1991) In re VERMONT TOY WORKS, INC., Debtor. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEBERT LUMBER CO., Defendant-Appellee, and Joseph C. Palmisano, Esq., Trustee and Intervening Defendant-Appellee. Civ. A. No. 88-44. United States District Court, D. Vermont. December 17, 1991. *763
82 B.R. 258 (1987) In re VERMONT TOY WORKS, INC., Debtor. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SEBERT LUMBER, CO., INC., Defendant, J.C. Palmisano, Esq., Trustee and Intervening Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 85-252, Adv. P. No. 86-0007. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont. December 23, 1987. *259
Reiber, CJ. ¶ 1. This case presents the question of whether Mount Mansfield Company, Inc. (MMC) had unitary operations with AIG Insurance Management Services, Inc. (AIG) such that AIG was required to include MMC as part of the AIG unitary group on its Vermont corporate income tax return. It also raises the question of whether, and under what circumstances, an amended tax return restar
Reilly v. Southwest Vermont Supervisory Unionpublic domain
Joan Reilly v. Southwest Vermont Supervisory Union et al., No. 152-4-14 Bncv (Valente, J., April 1, 2016). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT
Toy v. Metropolitan Life Insurancepublic domain
*24 OPINION Chief Justice CAPPY. In this civil action, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Georgina Toy (“Toy”) brought several causes of action against Appellees/Cross-Appellants Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan Life”) and one of its sales representatives, Bob Martini (“Martini”) (collectively, “Defendants”). We granted review to consid
Merit Behavioral Care Corp. v. State of Vermont Independent Panel of Mental Health Providerspublic domain
Dooley, J. ¶ 1. Merit Behavioral Care Corporation, a review agent that contracted with the State during the relevant time period to provide mental health care benefits to state employees, appeals the superior court’s summary judgment order dismissing its complaint seeking to overturn an independent panel’s decision that Merit should have provided coverage for state employee Jane Doe’s mental health treatment at the Austen Riggs C
Defendants/buyers, Richard Mazza, David Coates, and Maurice Germain (the Mazza group) appeal from a grant of partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff/buyer, Sisters and Brothers Investment Group (SBI). In granting summary judgment, the Chittenden Superior Court ordered specific performance of a purchase and sale agreement between SBI and Shore Properties, Inc. to sell a restaurant, and surrounding land, on Lakeshore Drive in Colchester. The Mazza group
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0118 Filed March 22, 2017 TED A. TORSTENSON, Individually, and TOBY T. TORSTENSON, Individually, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, vs. BIRCHWOOD ESTATE, L.L.C., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, David M. Porter, Jud
All Metal Recycling, Inc.public domain
STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT – ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION { In re All Metals Recycling, Inc. { Docket No. 171-11-11 Vtec Discretionary Permit Application { { Decision on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion to Amend Statement of Que
Markham Concepts, Inc. v. Pardopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1927 MARKHAM CONCEPTS, INC.; LORRAINE MARKHAM, individually and in her capacity as trustee of the Bill and Lorraine Markham Exemption Trust and the Lorraine Markham Family Trust; SUSAN GARRETSON, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. HASBRO, INC.; BEATRICE PARDO, in her capacity as successor co- trustee of the Reuben B. Kl
Knickerbocker Toy Co., Inc. v. Winterbrook Corp.public domain
554 F.Supp. 1309 (1982) KNICKERBOCKER TOY CO., INC. v. WINTERBROOK CORPORATION and St. James Doll Creations v. ST. JAMES DOLL CREATIONS. Civ. No. 81-521-D. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. September 30, 1982. *1310 Raymond V. Denault, Claremont, N.H., Robert Stoll, New York City, for plaintiff. Steve
Mylan Technologies, Inc. v. Zydus Noveltech, Inc.public domain
Mylan Technologies, Inc. v. Zydus Noveltech, Inc., No. S0041-09 CnC (Crawford, J., Jan. 24, 2012) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CI
Agway, Inc. v. Brookspublic domain
790 A.2d 438 (2001) AGWAY, INC. v. John H. and Mark BROOKS d/b/a Brooks Farm. No. 00-407. Supreme Court of Vermont. December 28, 2001. *439 James C. Foley, Jr., of Deppman & Foley, P.C., Middlebury, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Craig Weatherly of Gravel and Shea, Burlington, for Defendants-Appellants. Present: AMESTO
Bouchat v. Bon-Ton Department Stores, Inc.public domain
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the good opinion of my colleague writing for the court, recognizing that Bouchat, in seeking to avail himself of his victory in Bouchat I, has conceded that the downstream defendants he has named in the related cases before us are in privity with the defendants in Bouchat I. Therefore, the downstream defendants benefit from the preclusive effe
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2020 VT 84
Lemos v. Electrolux North America, Inc.public domain
78 Mass. App. Ct. 376 (2010) ZENILTON O. LEMOS v. ELECTROLUX NORTH AMERICA, INC., & another.[1] No. 09-P-943. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. June 4, 2010. December 2, 2010. Present: GREEN, DREBEN, & MILKEY, JJ. Paul A. Gargano (Aaron Weissman with him) for the plaintiff. Samuel M. Furgang</
Taylor v. Fred's, Inc.public domain
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Tiffany Taylor ("Ms. Taylor") initiated this purported class action arising under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 ("FACTA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(g), an amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"),
Federal Trade Commission v. Facebook Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Second time lucky? The Federal Trade Commission’s first antitrust suit against Facebook, Inc. stumbled out of the starting blocks, as this Court dis
Mohamed v. McLaurinpublic domain
Christina Reiss, District Judge On April 27, 2017, Plaintiffs Binti O. Mohamed and her minor children, H.M.A.,1 A.O.A., K.H.K., F.H.K., M.H.K., S.H.K., and S.H.K., filed this civil rights action against Defendant Michael McLaurin alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 as amended (the "FHA"),
Burley v. U.S. Foods, Inc.public domain
NO. COA13-860 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 1 April 2014 VINCENT BURLEY, Employee, Plaintiff, v. From the North Carolina Industrial Commission I.C. No. X52202 U.S. FOODS, INC., Employer, and INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Carrier, and GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., Third Pa