⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Vice Media LLC”

Superior Court of Delaware · 2022-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHOTSPOTTER INC., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N21C-10-082 SKR ) VICE MEDIA, LLC, ) ) Defendant. )
District Court, D. Delaware · 2018-09-17 · Published · cited 0× · 341 F. Supp. 3d 390
ANDREWS, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (D.I. 13) and related briefing (D.I. 14, 17, 22). The Court held oral argument on April 13, 2018. The parties later filed follow-up submissions (D.I. 23, 24). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 1× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 1213
KARON OWEN BOWDRE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE As defendants frequently point out, and as courts regularly affirm, even the most deeply wounding conduct rarely gives rise to civil liability for the tort of outrage. Suffering offense from truly insulting conduct is sometimes an unfortunate fact of life, so the law understandably hesitates to impose money damages for causing emotional distress in the minds of others. But, in ve
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019-04-17 · Published · cited 1× · 383 F. Supp. 3d 1365
CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant, William Menaker's Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal *1368Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim [ECF No. 70]. Plaintiff, Jason Miller, filed a Response [ECF No. 72], to which Defendant filed a Reply [ECF No. 82].
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-11-08 · Published · cited 1× · 381 F. Supp. 3d 343
Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge Malibu Media, LLC, commenced the above-captioned action against John Doe, asserting one count of copyright infringement pursuant to the United States Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. Before the court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 3× · 335 Ga. App. 62; 780 S.E.2d 108
DOYLE, Chief Judge. Olympus Media, LLC, and Olympus officer Ray Moyers (collectively “Olympus”) filed a declaratory judgment action against the City of Dunwoody seeking to challenge the City’s authority to deny it a permit for an existing billboard and to clarify Olympus’s rights under sign permits issued pursuant to a consent order with DeKalb County. The City counterclaimed, chal
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-08-11 · Published · cited 2× · 273 F. Supp. 3d 182
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Mohamed Fawzi was a cameraman for Al Jazeera in 2013 when he was assigned to work in the network’s Cairo office. Apparently, the new post was more than he bargained for:' Fawzi ended, up being arrested, and then tried in absentia, for his ties to his employer—by th
United States District Court · 2018-03-13 · Published · cited 5× · 320 F. Supp. 3d 1064
ROBERTO A. LANGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Caleb Giddings, a Senior Airman in the United States Air Force Reserves, worked for GunUp Publishing, Inc. (GunUp) in South Dakota. When GunUp merged with Media Lodge, Inc. (Media Lodge) in the spring of 2015, Giddings accepted a job as Media Lodge's director of sales. Shortly thereafter, Giddings left to serve active duty for five-plus months with the Air Force. After returni
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2019-06-10 · Published · cited 13× · 389 F. Supp. 3d 1031
VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1035This matter comes before the Court in consideration of Defendant Interactive Media Corp. d/b/a Kanguru Solutions' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, or in the Alternative for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. # 11), filed on March 4, 2019. Plainti
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-10-25 · Published · cited 7× · 732 F. Supp. 2d 389; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113305; 2010 WL 3001746
732 F.Supp.2d 389 (2010) ANDERSON NEWS, L.L.C. and Anderson Services, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN MEDIA, INC., Bauer Publishing Co., LP, Curtis Circulation Company, Distribution Services, Inc., Hachette Filipacchi Media, U.S., Hudson News Distributors LLC, Kable Distribution Services, Inc., the News Group, LP, Rodale, Inc., Time Inc. and Time/Warner Retail Sales & Marketing, Inc., Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 2227 (PAC).<
District Court, D. Delaware · 2018-11-28 · Published · cited 2× · 595 B.R. 19
In rendering its Fee Award, the Bankruptcy Court rejected YPPI's contention that Dex Media could only recover fees based upon the prevailing rates in the forum of the litigation (Delaware), and not the forum in which its attorneys practice (New York). (Id. at 5-6). In rejecting this argument, the Bankruptcy Court found that "the knowledge and expertise of [Dex Media's] Non-Local Counsel was critical to Dex Media's success in the litigation." (I
District Court, D. Delaware · 2018-07-30 · Published · cited 2× · 587 B.R. 606
Gregory M. Sleet, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION1 On June 18, 2014 the court issued an opinion finding the appeals equitably moot for the above-captioned bankruptcy appeals filed by Wilmington Trust Company ("Wilmington Trust"), Aurelius Capital Management, LP ("Aurelius"), Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Deutche Bank Trust Company Americas (t
District Court, D. Delaware · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 2× · 331 F. Supp. 3d 352
KEARNEY, District Judge A television network advertising a show purporting to describe the "true" story of disputed historical events must be careful to not misrepresent the specifics of its show so as to mislead the consumer concerning its product. Summarizing an argument or opinion offered within the show is different than a statement made about a show as a product such as its length, characters or producers. Whe
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-09-19 · Published · cited 0×
09/19/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 8, 2023 Session SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC., ET AL. v. NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 20C1054 Thomas W. Brothers, Judge _______
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022-05-20 · Published · cited 3× · 35 F.4th 108
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-3434 ____________ FDRLST MEDIA, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ____________ No. 20-3492 ____________ NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-1308 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 07/14/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TRINITY INFO MEDIA, LLC, FKA TRINITY INTEL MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. COVALENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1308 _____________________
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016-09-09 · Published · cited 1× · 148 A.3d 473; 2016 Pa. Super. 203; 2016 Pa. Super. LEXIS 517; 2016 WL 4721460
J-A33020-15 2016 PA Super 203 MARK WEBB, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ESTATE OF SABINO WEBB, PENNSYLVANIA DECEASED Appellant v. VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, VOLVO CARS CORPORATION, GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS, INC. (D/B/T/A NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.), WILLIAM JULIAN, AND ANA (WEBB) SOARES Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-07-14 · Published · cited 73× · 72 F.4th 1355
Case: 22-1308 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 07/14/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TRINITY INFO MEDIA, LLC, FKA TRINITY INTEL MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. COVALENT, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-1308 _____________________
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 129 N.Y.S.3d 778; 187 A.D.3d 451; 2020 NY Slip Op 05471
PPR Media LLC v Leo Cable LP (2020 NY Slip Op 05471) PPR Media LLC v Leo Cable LP 2020 NY Slip Op 05471 Decided on October 06, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau p
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-17-00570-CV Mometrix Media, LLC, Appellant v. LCR Publishing, LLC, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-17-001625, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING OPIN