⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Vicki L. Myers”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-3904 _____________________________ TIMOTHY MYERS, Appellant, v. VICKI L. MYERS, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Amy P. Brodersen, Judge. July 2, 2019 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WETHERELL, BILBREY,
Myers v. Myerspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-07-02 · Published · cited 0× · 274 So. 3d 1060
Affirmed.
Myers v. Myerspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-07-02 · Published · cited 0× · 274 So. 3d 1060
Affirmed.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-05-10 · Published · cited 0×
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-373 Lower Tribunal No. 16-DR-000706 _____________________________ VICKI MACPHERSON, Appellant, v. JOSEPH MACPHERS
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997-03-19 · Published · cited 15× · 113 F.3d 1187; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 11113; 1997 WL 251341
BY THE COURT: This matter is before us on a petition for writ of mandamus in which petitioners are seeking an order requiring the district court judge to grant their previously denied motion seeking his recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455. It is well established that mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, which is available only to correct a clear abuse of discreti
Myers v. Williamspublic domain
District Court, D. Oregon · 1993-04-21 · Published · cited 1× · 819 F. Supp. 919; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5304; 1993 WL 127745
819 F.Supp. 919 (1993) David Paul MYERS, Plaintiff, v. Sidney WILLIAMS and Upjohn Company, Defendants. Civ. No. 92-1609-FR. United States District Court, D. Oregon. April 21, 1993. David Paul Myers, pro se. Bruce C. Hamlin, Vicki L. Smith, Lane Powell Spears Lubersky, Portland, OR, for defendants. OPINION FRYE, District Judge: P
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 836 S.W.2d 431; 1992 Ky. App. LEXIS 68; 1992 WL 57123
SCHRODER, Judge. This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court denying appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to CR 60.02 claiming the trial court’s revocation of his probationary sentence was violative of KRS 533.040(3). The appellant, French D. Myers, plead guilty to second-degree burglary (amended) and receiving stolen property. The trial court withheld the sentence of five years on each offense
Parker v. Colsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019-07-02 · Published · cited 2× · 831 S.E.2d 102; 266 N.C. App. 182
MURPHY, Judge. *104 *183 Plaintiff, Terry Parker ("Parker"), challenges the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant, Barbara Colson Myers ("Myers"), on Parker's negligence
Parker v. Colsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 795 S.E.2d 654; 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 83; 2017 WL 490487
DAVIS, Judge. Terry Parker ("Plaintiff") appeals from the trial court's 31 March 2016 order granting the motion for summary judgment of Barbara Colson Myers ("Defendant"). After careful review, we dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Factual and Procedural Background Defendant's brother, Henry Colson ("Henry"), owned two pit bulls, which were kept at a residence owned by their
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2017-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued December 7, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00303-CV ——————————— CHEVRON BANGLADESH BLOCK TWELVE LTD., Appellant V. STEPHEN BALDWIN AND VICKI BALDWIN, Appellee
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2008-07-18 · Published · cited 28× · 391 B.R. 53; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 2236; 2008 WL 2780915
391 B.R. 53 (2008) In re Vicki J. FEHRS, fka Vicki Heard, Debtor. Abel O. Murrietta, Plaintiff, v. Vicki J. Fehrs, fka Vicki Heard, Defendant. Ford Elsaesser, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Vicki J. Fehrs, fka Vicki Heard, Defendant. Ford Elsaesser, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Vicki J. Fehrs, fka Vicki Heard, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-21306-TLM. Adversary Nos. 06-07020-TLM, 07-07032-TLM, 07-07033-TLM.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2011-02-15 · Published · cited 0× · 444 B.R. 585
MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MORTGAGES LTD. RANDOLPH J. HAINES, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue here is whether various mechanics’ lien claimants, who claim priority dating from the commencement of construction in November 2006, have priority over a construction deed of trust that was recorded in May of 2007. Among other defenses, the construction lender asserts the doctri
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 935 So. 2d 1135; 2006 Miss. App. LEXIS 573; 2006 WL 2255896
BARNES, J., for the Court. ¶ 1. Vicky L. Kirk applied for unemployment compensation and was denied bene*1137fits based on a finding that she voluntarily-left her employment. She appealed, and the Circuit Court of Forrest County reversed the Mississippi Employment Security Commission, finding that the employee had not engaged in misconduct. On appea
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020-05-01 · Published · cited 3× · 2020 Ohio 2760
[Cite as Bartlett v. Tan Pro Exp., L.L.C., 2020-Ohio-2760.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Thomas Bartlett Court of Appeals No. L-19-1113 Appellant Trial Court No. CI0201801464 v. Tan Pro Exp., LLC, et al. DECISION AND
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012-08-21 · Published · cited 45× · 402 U.S. App. D.C. 383; 696 F.3d 7; 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20177; 2012 WL 3570721; 75 ERC (BNA) 1776; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17535
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 13, 2012 Decided August 21, 2012 No. 11-1302 EME HOMER CITY GENERATION, L.P., PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 11-1315, 11-1323, 11-1329, 11-1338,
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-04-29 · Published · cited 165× · 188 L. Ed. 2d 775; 134 S. Ct. 1584; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3108; 572 U.S. 489
Justice GINSBURG delivered the opinion of the Court. These cases concern the efforts of Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) to cope with a complex problem: air pollution emitted in one State, but causing harm in other States. Left unregulated, the emitting or upwind State reaps the benefits of the economic activity causing the pollution without bearing all
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015-07-28 · Published · cited 23× · 417 App. D.C. 381; 795 F.3d 118; 417 U.S. App. D.C. 381; 80 ERC (BNA) 2005; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13039
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to set national ambient air quality standards, or NAAQS. Those standards limit the levels of common pollutants in the ambient air. See 42 U.S.C. § 7409(a). Under the Act, individual States are responsible for ensuring attainm
California Supreme Court · 2000-01-13 · Published · cited 77× · 990 P.2d 591; 91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 716; 22 Cal. 4th 201; 22 Cal. 201; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 479; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 362; 2000 Cal. LEXIS 5; 2000 WL 19465
MOSK, J., Concurring and Dissenting. I concur in the result, but disagree with the reasoning of the majority that an absolute privilege shields communications between the trustee and the attorney it consulted in its fiduciary capacity on the subject of trust administration. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo) brought this action f
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Remanded in Part and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed May 12, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-14-00097-CV VICKI WARD, Appellant V. LAMAR UNIVERSITY AND TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, Appellees On Appeal from the 172nd District Co
Indiana Supreme Court · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 54× · 27 N.E.3d 1069; 2015 Ind. LEXIS 275; 2015 WL 1573368
DAVID, Justice. Donald W. Myers, III, has a history of mental illness, and has been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. Unprovoked, Myers fired a shotgun several times at multiple vehicles, including a police cruiser. Myers was ultimately convicted on four counts of attempted murder. The jury found Myers guilty but mentally ill. Myers claims that no reasonable jury could have reached this conclusion and that he should h