Cases

OPINION AND ORDER CLAIRE V. EAGAN, District Judge. Now before this Court is defendant’s motion for summary-judgment (Dkt. # 86) and plaintiffs’ cross-motion' for partial summary judgment (Dkt. #87). Defendant seeks summary judgment on plaintiffs’ claim that defendant improperly cal*1170culated plaintiffs’ regular rate of pay for purp

598 F.2d 790 5 Media L. Rep. 1477 GTE SYLVANIA, INCORPORATEDv.CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, Richard O. Simpson,Barbara Franklin, Lawrence Kushner, ConstanceNewman, R. David Pittle, Sadye Dunn,Vince DeLuise.RCA CORPORATIONv.UNITED STATES CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, Richard O.Simpson, Barbara H. Franklin, Lawrence M. Kushner,Constance E. Newman, R. David Pittle,Sad

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ELENA NACARINO; MEGAN No. 22-15377 TAYLOR, D.C. No. 3:21-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellants, 07036-VC v. OPINION KASHI COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. MOLLY BROWN; ADINA No. 22-15658 RINGLER; CHRISTIAN LEMUS, D.C. No.

CATHERINE CRANDLE ET AL. v. CONNECTICUT STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT COMMISSION (SC 20532) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus The plaintiffs, C and R, former state employees who are members of Tier II and Tier IIA, respectively, of the State Employees Retirement System (SERS), appealed to the trial court from the ruling of the defe

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CATHLEEN PARRA,  Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 04-57046 v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,*  D.C. No. CV-04-03604-CT Commissioner of the Social OPINION Security Administrat

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ISMAEL TABLADA,  Petitioner-Appellant, No. 07-35538 v. J.E. THOMAS,* Warden, Federal  D.C. No. CV 06-00762-MO Correction Institute, Sheridan, OPINION Oregon,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20‐3425 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. THOMAS PROCTOR, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. SAFEWAY, INC., Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Distric

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TUALATIN VALLEY BUILDERS  SUPPLY, INC., No. 05-36173 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-04-01581-HA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States

54 B.R. 721 (1985) In re Clinton W. MURCHISON, Jr., Debtor. In re TECON REALTY CORPORATION, Debtor. Bankruptcy Nos. 385-30266-11, 385-30929-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. October 24, 1985. *722 James C. Slaughter, Jonathan B. Skidmore, Fulbright & Jaworski, Houston, Tex., Evelyn H. Biery, Fulbrig

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2011 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

CARNES, Circuit Judge: Employers generally are liable for a supervisor’s sexual harassment if the harassment is severe and pervasive enough to result in a hostile work environment amounting to discrimination prohibited by Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. There is, however, an affirmative defense, which the Supreme Court wrote into the law in Far

514 F.Supp.2d 1302 (2007) George POWELL et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAREY INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 05-21395-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. February 1, 2007. *1303 *1304 *1305 *1306 Chris

PER CURIAM: The Georgia Parties,1 Gwinnett County, Georgia, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) appeal from the Middle District of Florida’s grant of summary judgment in this consolidated suit. The appeal arises from more than 20 years of litigation involving the above parties as well as the States of Alabama and Florida, Alabama Power Company, the City of Apalachicola, Fl

644 F.3d 1160 (2011) In Re MDL-1824 TRI-STATE WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION. State of Alabama, Alabama Power Company, State of Florida, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, John M. McHugh, Secretary of the Army, et al., Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants. State of Georgia, Gwinnett County, Georgia, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees, v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, John M. McHugh, in hi

United States Transportation Command; Past Performance Evaluation; Performance Price Tradeoff; Commercial Marketplace; Global Privately-Owned Vehicle Contract. OPINION HORN, J. Protestor, American Auto Logistics, LP, filed a post-award bid protest on February 5, 2014, challenging the award by the United States Transportation Command

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE  COUNCIL, INC.; THE INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE; CETACEAN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL; LEAGUE FOR COASTAL PROTECTION; OCEAN FUTURES SOCIETY; JEAN- MICHEL COUSTEAU, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, Intervenor-Appellee, v.

OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Chief Judge. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (the Commission) appeals from an order of the district court granting the plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction prohibiting the Commission’s disclosure of certain documents obtained under its statutory information-gathering authority. The Commission had earlier made an administrative determination to release the docum