Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Violeta Rodriguez”
Alan Alberto Vega Fuentes v. Fatima Violeta Rojas Rodriguez and Attorney General of Texaspublic domain
Opinion issued March 21, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00814-CV ——————————— ALAN ALBERTO VEGA FUENTES, Appellant V. FATIMA VIOLETA ROJAS RODRIGUEZ
PER CURIAM. Claiming qualified immunity, defendant moved for . summary judgment. Without reaching the merits of the immunity claim, the district court denied the motion because it was “filed on the eve of trial” and “comes too late.” Defendant has appealed. For reasons which follow, we do not agree that the motion was filed too late. I
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII El Pueblo de Puerto APELACIÓN Rico procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelado Instancia, Sala de KLAN202301115 Mayagüez vs.
Violeta Valiente v. Luis Riverapublic domain
USCA1 Opinion June 5, 1992 ____________________ No. 91-2277 No. 91-2332 IRIS VIOLETA VALIENTE, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. HON. RAMON LUIS RIVERA, ETC., ET AL., Defend
Rodriguez-Mateo v. Fuentes-Agostinipublic domain
USCA1 Opinion Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to lst Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
Rodriguez v. Farm Stores Grocery, Inc.public domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge: We deny Farm Stores Grocery, Inc.’s petition for rehearing but withdraw our previous opinion dated January 28, 2008, and published at 514 F.3d 1207, and substitute the following opinion in its place: This appeal in a Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19, case involves a number of issues arising under that statute. It al
Rodriguez v. Farm Stores Grocery, Inc.public domain
518 F.3d 1259 (2008) Lorenda RODRIGUEZ, Vilma Thomas, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FARM STORES GROCERY, INC., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. Oasis Outsourcing, Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Counter-Claimant. Nos. 06-13186, 06-13303. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 6, 2008.
Elias Attallah, Violeta Lajam De Attallah, and the Conjugal Partnership They Comprise v. United Statespublic domain
*778 TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from an action brought by Elias Attallah and Violeta La-jam de Attallah against the United States Customs Service, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq., seeking to recover damages for the
in Re Fraudulent Hospital Lien Litigationpublic domain
NUMBER 13-19-00629-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI–EDINBURG IN RE FRAUDULENT HOSPITAL LIEN LITIGATION On appeal from MDL No. 15-0360-H in the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Tijerina
Matter of Olivares v. Rheapublic domain
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Housing Authority dated March 25, 2009, which, after a hearing, terminated the petitioner’s tenancy in a public housing facility, the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Edwards, J.), dated October 11, 2012, as, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to a pr
Quiroz ex rel. Cardona v. Llamas-Soforopublic domain
OPINION STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice This is a medical malpractice case. Elizabeth Quiroz brought suit as next friend of her son, Joseph' Cardona, against Dr. Jorge Fabio Llamas-Soforo, his professional association,1 and others.2 Quiroz alleged Dr. Llamas was negligent in screening and'treating Joseph’s retinopa-thy of prematurity (ROP) resu
971 F.2d 26 61 USLW 2083 Agustin RHOA-ZAMORA, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.Felipe Antonio JURESMA-ALTAMIRANO and LuisRodriguez-Altamirano, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.Luis Andres ESQUIVEL-BERRIOS, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 91-1949, 91-1513 and 9
The People v. Mercadopublic domain
Opinion KLEIN, P. J. Defendant and appellant, Monica Mercado, appeals the judgment entered following her conviction for second degree murder and attempted murder, with enhancements for inflicting great bodily injury and inflicting injury knowing the victim was pregnant (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 187, 12022.7, 12022.9.)
Kazadi v. Peoplepublic domain
Chief Justice BENDER, dissenting. { 24 The majority's holding denies Kazadi, who pleaded guilty to felony and misdemean- or drug charges and who stipulated to a deferred judgment on the felony charge and to a sentence of probation on the misdemean- or charge, the opportunity to use Crim. P. 35(c) to challenge the constitutional validity of his plea. Maj. op. at 11 1-2, 9-10, 16, 18-22. Kazadi has alleged that hi
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Francisco Elias Gomez-Mejia (“Gomez-Mejia”) appeals a final order of deportation against him by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Finding no reversible error, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1977, Gomez-Mejia, a citizen of Nicara
460 F.Supp.2d 307 (2006) Rosaura GONZALEZ-RUCCI, Plaintiff(s) v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION and NATURALIZATION SERVICE, et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 99-2352(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 1, 2006. *308 Carmen Eva Garcia-Cardenas, Lixandra Osorio-Felix, Nicolas Nogueras Law Offices, San Juan, PR, fo
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG. D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge: Nidia Gutierrez-Rogue de Picado, a citizen of Nicaragua, entered the United States illegally on September 28, 1984. Upon being apprehended by officials of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, she applied for asylum or, alternatively, for withholding of deport
R-Rpublic domain
Interim Decision #3182 MATTER OF R-R- In Deportation Proceedings A 29318907 - Decided by Board June 2, 1992 (I) An alien seeking reopening of proceedings based on his failure to request asylum before the completion of deportation proceedings must meet the general motion
Herbert Edmundo Gomez-Vigil and Silvia Auxiladora Hernandez De Gomez v. Immigration and Naturalization Servicepublic domain
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the panel’s per curiam opinion. I write separately to make clear that, in my view, the opinion on which we rely in the per curiam is neither constitutionally dubious nor jurisprudentially unprincipled as Judge Aldisert’s concurrence suggests. In Castillo-Villagra v. INS, 972 F.2d 1017 (9th Cir.1992), speaking for our court, a unanimous panel provi
CARROLL, District Judge: OVERVIEW Julio Cesar Berroteran-Melendez, his wife Ruth, and their two children (collectively “petitioners”) petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their request for asylum and withholding of deportation.