Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Virginia Vargas”
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL (X)1 JOSUÉ NATERA APELACIÓN CHIMELIS procedente del Tribunal de Primera Apelado Instancia, Sala TA2025AP00145 superior de v.
West Virginia Mutual Insurance v. Vargaspublic domain
*849 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 55] AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 53] IRENE M. KEELEY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are the parties’ competing motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff, the West Virginia Mutual Insurance Company (“West
State v. Vargaspublic domain
991 A.2d 1056 (2010) STATE v. Jose Luis VARGAS. No. 2009-82-CA. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. April 22, 2010. *1057 Virginia M. McGinn, Department of Attorney General, for Plaintiff. Paula Rosin, Office of the Public Defender, for Defendant. Present: SUTTELL, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, and ROBINSON, JJ.
United States v. VARGASpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KISOR, FLUHR, and HARRELL Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Hiram A. VARGAS Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Handling) Petty Officer Thi
Vargas v. Leepublic domain
Vargas v Lee (2022 NY Slip Op 04661) Vargas v Lee 2022 NY Slip Op 04661 Decided on July 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Vargasfontanez v. Vargaspublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 07/10/2024 06:10 PM CDT - 860 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 32 Nebraska Appellate Reports VARGASFONTANEZ V. VARGAS Cite as 32 Neb. App. 860 Rafael A. Vargasfontanez, also know
Rutherford v. Vargaspublic domain
By JUDGE RUSSELL I. TOWNSEND, JR. This case was taken under advisement after the presentation of evidence on August 24, 1989, to afford the Court an opportunity to consider legal precedents submitted by counsel for the defendant. Defendant contends the oral agreement for him to provide hospitalization insurance was a modification of an oral "just cause" employment contract not capable of performance within
Barreras v. Vargaspublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered July 25, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim of serious injury (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]) to the right shoulder, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied. Defendants made a prima facie showing t
Vargas v. Leepublic domain
Vargas v Lee (2019 NY Slip Op 02142) Vargas v Lee 2019 NY Slip Op 02142 Decided on March 20, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
Vargas v. Martepublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered March 6, 2014, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the failure to establish a serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and to demonstrate property damage, and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendants
State v. Morel-Vargaspublic domain
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. NUELITO MOREL-VARGAS (SC 20572) McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Convicted of the crime of sexual assault in the first degree, the defendant appealed. The defendant, a non-English speaker who required the use of an interpreter, did not testify in his own defense at trial. The prosecutor, before deciding whether to rest the state’s case,
United States v. Victor Vargaspublic domain
USCA11 Case: 22-10604 Document: 61-1 Date Filed: 04/03/2024 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10604 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Jaime Vargas v. Lincare, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 24-11080 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 04/16/2025 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11080 ____________________ JAIME VARGAS, United States o
Vargas-Salguero v. Statepublic domain
Panel: Nazarian, Reed, Beachley, JJ. Nazarian, J. *322 Craig Kettleman: I just think I'd look guilty if I hired a lawyer. James McGill: No, actually it's getting arrested that makes people look guilty, even the innocent on
Mario Vargas v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-18-00225-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARIO VARGAS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 319th District Cou
Jaime Vargas v. Lincare, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 24-11080 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 04/16/2025 Page: 1 of 23 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11080 ____________________ JAIME VARGAS, United States o
In re Vargas Velázquezpublic domain
per curiam: Nos corresponde sancionar a un miembro de la profesión legal por violaciones a los cánones del Código de Ética Profesional y a la Ley Notarial de Puerto Rico. Por las razones expuestas a continuación, suspendemos indefinidamente al Ledo. Ferdinand Vargas Velázquez del ejercicio de la notaría y lo suspendemos del ejercicio de la abogacía por el término de seis meses.
Tiffany Vargas v. Riverbend Management LLCpublic domain
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2024 ME 27 Docket: Cum-23-249 Argued: February 7, 2024 Decided: April 18, 2024 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. TIFFANY VARGAS et al. v. RIVERBEND MANAGEMENT LLC HORTON, J. [¶1] We are called to consider the standard gov
United States v. Vargaspublic domain
19-463-cr United States v. Vargas UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: March 13, 2020 Decided: June 9, 2020 Docket No. 19-463-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
State v. Vargaspublic domain
SEVERSON, Justice. [¶ 1.] A jury found Defendant, Alfredo Vargas, guilty of attempted fetal homicide. He appeals, alleging that attempted fetal homicide is a legal impossibility and that the circuit court made erroneous evidentia-ry rulings. We reverse. Background [¶ 2.] A jury found Defendant guilty of attempted fetal homicide.