Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Vitale v. City of New York”
Vitale v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered on August 3, 1990, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff Vitale’s motion to be appointed receiver pursuant to CPLR 5228 (a), of Hagan’s causes of action for indemnification and legal malpractice against the City, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leonard N. Cohen, J.), entered on October 1, 1990, which, inter alia, </
Vitale v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the action dismissed. Plaintiff, an industrial arts teacher at a junior high school, was injured when he was assaulted by one of the students as he sought to break up an altercation in the hallway of the school. Asserted liability of the city was predicated on evidence of unjustified failure
Vitale v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Rosen, J.), entered on February 20, 1981, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favo
OPINION OF THE COURT Acosta, J.P. In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, the question presented to this Court is not whether we agree with the administrative agency’s determination that a union was entitled to obtain certain documents relevant to disciplinary proceedings against two of its members, but simply whether the determination was rationally based. Bec
Vital v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), *310entered March 16, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the cross motion for summary judgment by defendants Ry Management and Keith Plaza to dismiss plaintiffs claims under Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6), and for contractual indemnity against defendant Millenium Restoration, unanimously modified, on the law, and summary judgment gr
Montepagani v. New York City Department of Healthpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J.), entered January 7, 2011, which, upon granting petitioner’s motion to renew, adhered to its prior order (same court and Justice), entered August 30, 2010, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs. We find that the IAS court property denied the petition both in its original order and upon renewal. As a preliminary matter,
Gorokhovsky v. New York City Housing Authoritypublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Lyudvig Gorokhovsky appeals from the judgment of the District Court dismissing his complaint in favor of defendants. Gorokhovsky’s suit alleged that the New York City Housing Authority and its employees (jointly, “NYCHA”) unlawfully engaged in employment discrimination based upon his race, national origin, and age; created a hostile work environment; and retaliated against him for exercising his First Amendment
Betancourt v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Betancourt v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 02403) Betancourt v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 02403 Decided on April 24, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
C.D. v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
C.D. v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 25005) [*1] C.D. v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 25005 Decided on January 8, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Kingo, J. Published by New York State Law Report
C.D. v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
C.D. v City of New York (2025 NY Slip Op 25005) [*1] C.D. v City of New York 2025 NY Slip Op 25005 Decided on January 8, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Kingo, J. Published by New York State Law Report
Elias Bochner v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
23-683 Elias Bochner, et al. v. City of New York, et al. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2023 No. 23-683 ELIAS BOCHNER, 287 7TH AVENUE REALTY LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Melendez v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
20-4238 Melendez v. City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-4238-cv MARCIA MELENDEZ, JARICAN REALTY INC., 1025 PACIFIC LLC, LING YANG, TOP EAST REALTY LLC, HAIGHT TRADE LLC, ELIAS BOCHNER, 287 7TH AVENUE REALTY LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Matter of Vitale v. Cabanpublic domain
Matter of Vitale v Caban (2025 NY Slip Op 03267) Matter of Vitale v Caban 2025 NY Slip Op 03267 Decided on May 29, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd. v New York City Off. of Collective Bargaining (2025 NY Slip Op 25014) [*1] New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd. v New York City Off. of Collective Bargaining 2025 NY Slip Op 25014 Decided on January 21, 2025 Supreme Court, New York
New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd. v New York City Off. of Collective Bargaining (2025 NY Slip Op 25014) [*1] New York State Pub. Empl. Relations Bd. v New York City Off. of Collective Bargaining 2025 NY Slip Op 25014 Decided on January 21, 2025 Supreme Court, New York
New York Central Lines, LLC v. Vitalepublic domain
An award made after a consensual arbitration may be vacated by a court pursuant to CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (iii) on only three narrow grounds: if it is clearly violative of a strong public policy, if it is totally or completely irrational, or if it manifestly exceeds a specific, enumerated limitation on the arbitrator’s power (see Matter of Erin Constr. & Dev. Co., Inc. v Meltzer, 58 AD3d 729, 729 [2009]; see also Matter of United Fedn. of Tea
Moura v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Moura v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 06618) Moura v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 06618 Decided on October 4, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t
Matter of Severini v New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection (2025 NY Slip Op 05051) Matter of Severini v New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection 2025 NY Slip Op 05051 Decided on September 23, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
Vital v. New Yorkpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs Judex Vital and Stuart Jean Sanon brought the present action on October 12, 2000, alleging that they were “subjected to a series of unlawful measures by [defendants], including interrogation, an illegal identification line-up, and a strip search,” after being “wrongly accused of being involved in a physical altercation which took place in the cafeteria at the State University of New York, Old West-bury campus”
Simon v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
17‐1281 Simon v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: March 1, 2018 Decided: June 21, 2018)