Cases

637 N.E.2d 1115 (1994) 264 Ill.App.3d 901 202 Ill.Dec. 379 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward MOORE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-93-0476. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. June 29, 1994. Rehearing Denied August 10, 1994.

Plaintiff appealed from an Order by Deputy Commissioner Wanda B. Taylor dismissing his claim with prejudice on June 25, 1999 for failing to appear at the hearing. Plaintiff gave notice of appeal to the Full Commission from Deputy Commissioner Taylors Order in a letter dated July 24, 1999. Deputy Commissioner Lorrie L. Dollar filed an Order of Continuance in this matter on October 19, 1998 at plaintiffs request so that plaintiff could obtain counsel and prepare for the hearing. The case

Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the award, except for minor modifications, the Full Commission AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commis

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award based on the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission hereby modifies and affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters

Reversed and Rendered and Opinion filed October 6, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00414-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. EDGAR GONZALEZ, ET AL., Appellees On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

I dissent from the majority Opinion and Award in this matter because I do not believe that the competent evidence of record establishes that plaintiff's injury arose out of and in the course of her employment as an in-home caregiver. In Hoyle v Isenhour Brick Tile Co., 348 N.C. 248,293 S.E.2d 196 (1982), the Supreme Court cited several previous cases elaborating on this element of the definition of injury by acci

290 F.3d 720 Lois STRAWSER; Joyce Perry; James H. Sheppard; Mary Jean Booth; Joyce D. Barker; Betty Jean Gilman; Kathy Robertson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Nancy V. ATKINS, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Medical Services, West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources; Darrell W. Peters, in his capacity as supervisor, Third Party Liability Office of Adminis

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Bost and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award, except with the modification of language denying plaintiffs claim for compensation for her left elbow epicondylitis condition.<

MEMORANDUM OPINION Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge “In all literature, there is perhaps no more vivid example of a man wrestling with the knowledge of his own guilt than that of Raskolnikov in [Fyodor] Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment.”1 “Throughout Crime and Punishment, Dostoyevsky provides examples of physical actions and

262 F.3d 222 (3rd Cir. 2001) WILLIAM TURNER; YVONNE RUFFIN; JAMES OECHSLE; GLADYS WOODARD; GEORGE AALBREGTSE; CALVIN AKERS; ROBERT ALBRIGHT; BARRY AMOS; KEVIN ANDERSON; ELLIOTT BAILEY; TYRONE BANKS; WILLIAM BAUER; WILSON BECKWITH, JR.; VITO BENDZIUS; DEBORAH BLACKMAN; GLENDA BLAKE; LORETTA BLAKE; BERTRAND BLIER, SR.; JOSEPH BLOCKER; MARY BONETT; JAMES BOSTON; CHARLES BOTTOMS; CAROLYN BOYCE; FABIAN BRINSON; VICTOR BROWN; WILLIAM BRYANT; RALPH BURTON

614 S.E.2d 599 (2005) Donna L. BROWN, Wesley R. Brown and wife, Martee U. Brown, Jack M. Fisher and wife, Cathey G. Fisher, Anthony N. Hubbard and wife, Frances M. Hubbard, James M. Mecum, Jr., Garnett L. Midkiff, Jr., E. Raymond Nicholson, Donald W. Peters, G. Floyd Sides and wife, Jo Ann Sides, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Allen Joines, Mayor, Vivian H. Burke, Dan Besse, Robert C. Clark, Joycelyn V. Johnson, Nelson L. Malloy, Jr., Vern

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

Opinion issued March 10, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ________

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

PER CURIAM: Rawl Sales and Processing Company and Massey Energy Company (Defendants) appeal from the district court’s order granting the Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint by dismissing the sole federal claim (Count 12) and remanding the remaining state law claims to West Virginia state court. The Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000).

COPE, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). Respectfully, the majority opinion is contrary to the decisions of the Florida Supreme Court in Kinney System, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 86 (Fla.1996), and the United States Supreme Court in Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. Rhoditis, 398 U.S. 306, 90 S.Ct. 1731, 26 L.Ed.2d 252 (1970).

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 22, 2009 at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYWAN GARCIA ARMSTRONG Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 08CR21 Robert Crigler, Judge No. M2008-02837-CCA-R3-CD - Filed March 18, 2010 The Defendant, Tywan Garcia Armstrong, was convicted by a jury in Marshall County