Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “WARREN v. DESANTIS”
Andrew H. Warren v. Ron DeSantispublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-10459 Document: 121-1 Date Filed: 01/10/2025 Page: 1 of 5 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10459 ____________________ ANDREW H. WARREN,
Andrew H. Warren v. Ron DeSantispublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-10459 Document: 85-1 Date Filed: 01/10/2024 Page: 1 of 59 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10459 ____________________ ANDREW H. WARREN,
Andrew H. Warren v. Ron DeSantispublic domain
USCA11 Case: 23-10459 Document: 89-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2024 Page: 1 of 59 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10459 ____________________ ANDREW H. WARREN,
Hon. Andrew H. Warren v. Ron DeSantis, Governorpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-0247 ____________ ANDREW H. WARREN, Petitioner, vs. RON DESANTIS, GOVERNOR, Respondent. June 22, 2023 CANADY, J. On August 4, 2022, Governor Ron DeSantis issued Executive Order 22-176 suspe
Ron DeSantis, Governor v. Dream Defenderspublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-0053 ____________ RON DESANTIS, GOVERNOR, et al., Appellants, vs. DREAM DEFENDERS, et al., Appellees. June 20, 2024 COURIEL, J. Today we answer a certified question from the United States Court of
State v. Warrenpublic domain
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 446 (AC 24170), is denied.
State v. Warrenpublic domain
Opinion LAVERY, C. J. The defendant, Raymond F. Warren, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly admitted the testimony of a Norwich police officer under the constancy of accusation doctrine, beyond the parameters set fo
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-928 _____________________________ GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Education; STATE OF FLORIDA; FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; FLORIDA BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM; FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; and RICHARD CORCORAN, in his offic
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2023-1246 ____________ MONIQUE HAUGHTON WORRELL, Petitioner, vs. RON D. DESANTIS, GOVERNOR, Respondent. June 6, 2024 PER CURIAM. Monique H. Worrell petitions this Court for a writ of quo warranto and a
DeSantis v. Podbelskipublic domain
The plaintiff and the three defendants have held a parcel of land in Ware as tenants in common since the death of their mother and the later death of a fifth sibling. In 1975 they agreed that the parcel should be held in the family and decided to sell it to the sibling who would pay the highest price. A procedure for bidding was worked out by one Patrick Martowski, an attorney, who sent to each of the parties a letter outlining the bidding procedure. The fou
Kevin Emas v. Ron D. DeSantis, Governorpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida FRIDAY, AUGUST 7, 2026 Kevin Emas, SC2026-0985 Petitioner(s) v. Ron D. DeSantis, Governor, Respondent(s) Petitioner’s “Verified, Time-Sensitive, Non-Routine Petition for Writ of Mandamus” is hereby denied as moot. COURIEL, C.J., and MUÑIZ, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., concurs with an opinion. TANENBAUM, J., specially concurs with
Pugh v. Desantispublic domain
Spain, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Krogmann, J.), entered December 21, 2005 in Warren County, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In January 2003, while stopped in preparation to make a left turn, the vehicle driven by plaintiff Mary Pugh (hereinafter plaintiff) was struck from behind by a vehicle operated by defendant Frank V. DeSantis (
DeSantis v. Statepublic domain
760 N.E.2d 641 (2001) Salvatore DeSANTIS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 30A01-0102-CR-65. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 21, 2001. Rehearing Denied February 7, 2002. *642 J.J. Paul III, Mitchell P. Chabraja, Voyles, Zahn, Paul, Hogan & Merriman, Indianapolis, IN, Att
751 F.2d 384 Desantis (Isabelle), Desantis (Paul A.)v.Ross (Eugene), Ross (Valeria), Ross (Renee), Ross (Michele),Ross (Mark), West (Jack), Hargis (Ted), Hargis (Terry),Defranco (Robert), Domiano (Joseph), Porter (Ted), Berk(Richard), Fienga (Warren), Haddad (Norman), Cockrell (Richard) NO. 83-3630 United States Court of Appeals,sixth Circuit. NOV 30,
State v. Warrenpublic domain
859 A.2d 567 (2004) 271 Conn. 907 STATE of Connecticut v. Raymond F. WARREN. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided September 8, 2004. Sebastian O. DeSantis, special public defender, in support of the petition. Annemarie L. Braun, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition. The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appe
Carpinello, J. Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered July 29, 1996 in Warren County, which, inter alia, partially granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and declared that defendant was not obligated to defend or indemnify plaintiffs in an underlying action brought by Esko Virta. Plaintiff DeSantis Enterprises, Inc. owns and operates three restaurants in Warren Cou
United States v. Warren Robert Brutzmanpublic domain
45 F.3d 437NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Warren Robert BRUTZMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50839. United State
DeSantis v. Miller Petroleum Co.public domain
29 Cal.App.2d 679 (1938) WILLIAM A. DeSANTIS et al., Appellants, v. MILLER PETROLEUM COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Defendants; CAMINOL COMPANY, LTD. (a Corporation), Respondent. Civ. No. 11924. California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two. December 16, 1938. George Appell and Harry A. Mock for Appellants. Paul J. Fritz for Respo
Reiter v. ACandS, Inc.public domain
947 A.2d 570 (2008) 179 Md. App. 645 Catherine L. REITER, et al. v. ACANDS, INC., et al. No. 670 Sept.Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. May 6, 2008. *571 Michael T. Edmonds (Timothy J. Hogan, Steven M. Lubar, Law Offices of Peter T. Nicholl, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for appellants.
Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLCpublic domain
8 A.3d 725 (2010) 417 Md. 57 Catherine L. REITER et al. v. PNEUMO ABEX, LLC et al. No. 72, September Term, 2008. Court of Appeals of Maryland. November 19, 2010. *726 Michael T. Edmonds (Timothy J. Hogan of Law Offices of Peter T. Nicholl, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for petitioners. Steven J. Parrott