Cases

PRESENT: Lemons, C.J., Goodwyn, Mims, Powell, Kelsey, and McCullough, JJ. GEORGE TINGLER, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 180791 JUSTICE D. ARTHUR KELSEY OCTOBER 31, 2019 GRAYSTONE HOMES, INC. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CULPEPER COUNTY Susan L. Whitlock, Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT GKN ARMSTRONG WHEELS, INC.’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED PETITION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..1179 A. Factual Background ... 1179

ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 Amended August 24, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case chall

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law mandating

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law mandating

246 B.R. 671 (2000) In re HONEY CREEK ENTERTAINMENT, INC. d/b/a Arbuckle Wilderness, Debtor. Kenneth G.M. Mather, Chapter 11 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Lena Clancy, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 97-71626, Adversary No. 99-7079. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Oklahoma. March 23, 2000. *672

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-0090 Filed February 21, 2018 JOHN WENDELL WOODS, RONALD WOODS, C&W FARMS and WOODS CONSTRUCTION, INC, JAMES RICHARD COSTELLO and CITY OF FAIRBANK, Plaintiffs-Appellees, vs. FAYETTE COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CATHERINE MILLER AS FAYETTE COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, DANTE WIND 6, L.L.C., GALILEO WIND 1 L.L.C., VENUS WIND 4 L.L.C., MASON WIND L.L.C., OPTIMUM RENE

[J-68A-B-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 29 EAP 2015 : Appellant : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated December

William C. Griesbach, Chief Judge Plaintiff, Theresa Mason-Funk, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, individually *1009and in her capacity as the personal representative of the estate of her husband Michael Funk, se

OPINION JUSTICE TODD The Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees citizens protection against the government by limiting its power to punish. In this appeal by allowance, we consider, inter alia, the constitutional limitations on civil in rem forfeiture in Pennsylvania under the Excessive Fines C

ROBINSON, C.J. **561 In this appeal, we consider the limits of free speech on a public university campus in light of recent history that has led federal and state courts to describe threats of gun violence and mass shootings as the twenty-first century equivalent to the shout of fire in a c

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 5, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-1987 Lower Tribunal No. 07-99-M ________________ Rodney Shands, et al., Appellants,

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Indiana and Wisconsin are among the shrinking majority of states that do not recognize the validity of same-sex marriages, whether contracted in these states or in states (or foreign countries) where they are lawful. The states have appealed from district court decisions invalidating the states’ laws that ordain such refusal.

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2025 ME 6 Docket: BCD-23-122 Argued: November 9, 2023 Decided: January 28, 2025 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J.1 Majority: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, and CONNORS, JJ., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J. Dissent: DOUGLAS and LAWRENCE, JJ. ROBERT E. DUPUIS et al.

MEMORANDUM ENTRY NOLAND, District Judge. I. Factual Background Central Foundry Division, General Motors Corporation (hereinafter “defendant”), is an industrial facility in Lawrence County, Indiana. Complaint, ¶ 2; Answer, ¶ 2. On April 15, 1988, the defendant hired Jungclaus-Campbell Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Company”) to provide all labor, equipment, mater

OPINION Justice CASTILLE.* We granted allowance of appeal in the instant case to determine whether, under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, a landowner has a reasonable expectation of privacy against enforcement of Pennsylvania’s Game Code in his open fields. Because we conclude that the Fourth Amendment open fields doctrine as enunciated by the

PALMER, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...273 II. ALLEGED FACTS...275 III. NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT...278 IV. WRONGFUL DEATH AND CUTPA: ISSUES OF STATE LAW...283 A. CUTPA Standing ...285 B. Statute of Limitation

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr