Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “WENDELL BRYAN JOHNSON”
Bryan v. Leachpublic domain
85 S.W.3d 136 (2001) Julia Sledge Leach BRYAN v. James Wendell LEACH. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. June 5, 2001. Rehearing Denied July 5, 2001. Permission to Appeal Denied December 17, 2001. *139 Wm. Kennerly Burger, Murfreesboro, TN, Gregory D. Smith, Nashville, TN, for appellant,
Kelley v. Johnsonpublic domain
Cite as 2016 Ark. 268 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS CV-15-992 No. WENDY KELLEY, IN HER OFFICIAL Opinion Delivered: June 23, 2016 CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; AND ARKANSAS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT APPELLANTS [60CV-15-2921] V. HONORABL
State v. Hendersonpublic domain
BOLIN, Justice. These petitions for a writ of mandamus seek the dismissal of capital-murder indictments against two juvenile offenders based on Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005), and Mil*1264ler v. Alabama, 567' U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). In Roper, the United States Supreme
Julia Leach Bryan v. James Leachpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 1999 Session JULIA SLEDGE LEACH BRYAN v. JAMES WENDELL LEACH Appeal from the Chancery Court for Maury County No. 91-540 Jim Hamilton, Chancellor No. M1998-00922-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 5, 2001 This case involves post-divorce disputes over alimon
253 S.W.3d 184 (2007) TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, City of Denton, City of Garland, and Geus f/k/a Greenville Electric Utility System, Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS and City of Bryan, Texas, Respondents Texas Municipal Power Agency, City of Denton, Texas, City of Garland, Texas, and City of Greenville, Texas, Petitioners, v. Public Utility Commission of Texas and City of Bryan, Texas, Respondents. <
Julia Leach Bryan v. James Leachpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 15, 1999 Session JULIA SLEDGE LEACH BRYAN v. JAMES WENDELL LEACH Appeal from the Chancery Court for Maury County No. 91-540 Jim Hamilton, Chancellor No. M1998-00922-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 5, 2001 This case involves post-divorce disputes over alimony and
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Juan Adamepublic domain
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00654-CV UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant V. JUAN ADAME, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AMELIA ADAME (DECEASED); TONY ALVARADO; CAROLINE ANDREWS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF JEROME JOHNSON, SR. (DECEASED); VANESSA BA
State v. Leshaypublic domain
213 P.3d 1071 (2009) STATE of Kansas, Appellant, v. Wendell LESHAY, Appellee. No. 99,725. Supreme Court of Kansas. August 28, 2009. *1073 Tony Cruz, assistant county attorney, argued the cause, and Steve Six, attorney general, was with him on the brief for the appellant. Janine Cox, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, arg
Tucker v. Ernst & Young, LLPpublic domain
MAIN, Justice. Wade Tucker and Wendell Cook Testamentary Trust, on behalf of shareholders of HealthSouth Corporation (hereinafter referred to collectively as “HealthSouth”), brought this shareholder-derivative action against Ernst & Young, LLP (“E & Y”), asserting claims of “audit malpractice” based on E & Y’s failure to discover and, if discovered, to report accounting fraud. The “audit malpractice” c
Omaha Healthcare Center, L.L.C. v. Wilma Johnson, on Behalf of the Estate of Classie Mae Reedpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06
Maitland v. University of Minnesotapublic domain
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is making its third appearance in this Court, having been twice dismissed and revived on appeal. In this latest interlocutory appeal, the University of Minnesota (the “University”), the members of the Board of Regents, and the President of the University (the “individual defendants”), appeal the District Court’s
In Re Belzpublic domain
MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge, dissenting. “Hard cases make bad law” is a familiar adage that seems to fit this case. The adage appears in a dissent by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. “Great cases, like hard cases, make bad law,” Holmes said. “For great cases are called great, not by reason of their real importance in shaping the law of the future, but because of some accident of immediate overwhelming interest whi
Taylor v. Burlington N. R.R. Holdings, Inc.public domain
FAIRHURST, C.J. *614*608¶1 The Washington Law Against Discrimination (WLAD) generally prohibits employers from discriminating against an employee because the employee has a disability. RCW 49.60.180. An employee has a disability if they have an "impairme
Dunaway v. UAP/GA AG. CHEM., INC.public domain
687 S.E.2d 211 (2009) DUNAWAY et al. v. UAP/GA AG. CHEM., INC. No. A09A2195. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 20, 2009. *212 Wilson R. Smith, Smith & Jenkins, Savannah, for Appellant. Frank F. Middleton, IV, Watson & Spence, Albany, for Appellee. MIKELL, Judge. UAP/GA AG. Chem., Inc. ("UAP"), an
Wilson v. McLeod Oil Co., Inc.public domain
383 S.E.2d 392 (1989) Ronald T. WILSON and Marilyn Wilson, Individually, and Ronald T. Wilson as Guardian ad Litem for Warren Craig Wilson, Christopher Thomas Wilson, and Matthew Reid Wilson, Minor Children, and Wendell Scott Wilson; Guy Hill and Marie Hill, Individually, and Guy Hill as Guardian ad litem for Emily Gwen Hill, Minor Child, and Craig Frederick Hill, and C.N. White, Plaintiffs, and Walter Pagura, Sheila Pagura, and Beverley C. Pagur
Boston Correll v. Herringpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court following a bench trial on the merits of the FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNC-TIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF (the “Amended Complaint”) (ECF No. 20) filed by Carroll Boston Correll, Jr. (“Cor-rell”). For the reasons, and to the extent, set forth below, judgment including declaratory
Andrews v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSBpublic domain
474 F.Supp.2d 1006 (2007) Susan and Bryan ANDREWS, Plaintiffs, v. CHEVY CHASE BANK, FSB, Defendant. No. 05C0454. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. February 14, 2007. Kevin J. Demet, Donal M. Demet, Demet & Demet SC, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiffs. David J. Cynamon, Osman A. Handoo, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC, Michael J.
Kerner v. Johnsonpublic domain
583 P.2d 360 (1978) 99 Idaho 433 William KERNER and Charles Barnes, Individually, and as Directors of and on behalf of the American Falls Reservoir District No. 2, a Quasi Municipal Corporation, and Corwin Silva and Floyd Silva, Individually on behalf of themselves and all other holders of title to lands located and subject to assessment within the boundaries of the American Falls Reservoir District No. 2, who are similarly situat
Trammell Crow Central Texas, Ltd. v. Gutierrezpublic domain
220 S.W.3d 33 (2006) TRAMMELL CROW CENTRAL TEXAS, LTD., Appellant, v. Maria GUTIERREZ, Individually and as Next Friend of Andrew Martinez; Christopher Martinez; and Alex Martinez; and Karol Ferman, Individually and as Next Friend of Luis Angel Gutierrez, Appellees. No. 04-05-00056-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. December 20, 2006.
State v. Jamond Terrypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Jamond Terry, 2024-Ohio-2876.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-230383 TRIAL NO. B-1907101 Plaintiff-Appellee, : vs. :