Cases

179 F.Supp.2d 1345 (2001) William David BERRY, Plaintiff, v. Timothy S. SALTER, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-D-383-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. October 18, 2001. William P. Sawyer, Turner, Wilson & Sawyer, Wayne Paulk Turner, Turner, Wilson & Sawyer, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff. Ronald R. Coleman, Jr., Denni

747 S.W.2d 519 (1988) David Lee MEDFORD, Appellant, v. Joyce C. SALTER, Appellee. No. 13-87-173-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. March 17, 1988. Karri J. Webb-Oldham, Charles W. Lyman, Alice M. Giessel, Giessel, Stone, Barker & Lyman, Houston, for appellant. William K. Wilder, Bay City, Gary L. McConnell, McConnell & Klement, Angleton, f

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-2204 _____________________________ POYET ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. JAMES D. SALTER, ESQ., an individual, DAVID MENET, ESQ., an individual, SALTER FEIBER P.A., a Florida professional corporation, and DELL GRAHAM, P.A. (f/k/a DELL SALTER, P.A.), a Florida professional corporation.

On Labor Day, September 1, 1980, at approximately 11:20 p.m., one of the plaintiffs below, James Salter, was driving his father's pickup in a northerly direction on FM 770, about one mile north of Raywood, when his vehicle was in a collision with another pickup being driven by Junior Bryant traveling in the opposite or southerly direction. Richard Hopson was a passenger in the Bryant vehicle owned by Melvin Williams Construction, Inc. Salter and the widow of Hopson (on behalf of herse

Joint motion of parties filed herein on April 14, 1986 in the above numbered and entitled cause having been duly considered, it is ordered that the joint motion be, and hereby is, granted. It is ordered that Petitioner's application for writ of error is granted; the judgments of the courts below are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further action pursuant to the settlement agreement.

On June 15, 1984 AmSouth Bank, N.A., filed suit in the District Court of Mobile County, Alabama against Kenneth M. Salter and Timothy Dale Lowder, seeking recovery on a promissory note. The district court entered a judgment in favor of Lowder against the bank and a judgment in favor of the bank against Salter. Subsequently, Salter appealed to the circuit court and filed a counterclaim. AmSouth Bank then filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim and a motion for summary judgment. The

682 N.W.2d 537 (2004) 261 Mich. App. 559 Terry SALTER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jill I. Salter, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William F. PATTON, M.D., and Pulmonary Medicine, P.C., Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 243053. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted February 4, 2004, at Lansing. Decided April 13, 2004, at

[1] David Salter appeals the court's refusal to vacate an arbitration award granted the Farners. We affirm. [2] In 1975, Salter purchased the stock in Rocky Mountain Sales and Services, Inc., from the Farners and Younger (the Farners), signing a promissory note for the balance of the sales price. When Salter defaulted on the note, the Farners brought suit. Salter answered and filed a separate *Page 414 suit alleging misrepresentation and br

162 N.W.2d 427 (1968) STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. David SALTER, Appellant. No. 53139. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 12, 1968. *428 Life, Davis & Life, Oskaloosa, for appellant. Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., and William A. Claerhout, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. LeGRAND, Justice. This is the aftermat

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CP-00481-COA DAVID PAYTON A/K/A DAVID R. PAYTON APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/17/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM A. GOWAN JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 30, 2017 No. 16-20445 Lyle W. Cayce

NO. 07-01-0431-CR NO. 07-01-0432-CR NO. 07-01-0433-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A MAY 9, 2002 ______________________________

Frank Marion Salter, Sr., was indicted for conspiracy to sell cocaine in violation of § 20-2-163, Code of Alabama 1975, and for the sale of cocaine in violation of § 13A-12-211. He was found "guilty as charged in the indictment" and was sentenced to four years in prison, one year to be served and three years to be spent on probation. The appellant raises four issues on appeal. The pertinent facts will be discussed as they arise below.

Per Curiam. This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment entered September 26, 1952, in favor of plaintiffs against defendant. Plaintiffs, feeling themselves aggrieved, have appealed. Defendant-respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellants have not filed an effectual appeal bond or deposited cash in lieu thereof. Rule on Appeal 22, as amended effective January 2, 1

269 Md. 494 (1973) 307 A.2d 485 CLARK-KING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND ANDRESEN v. SALTER AND TAYLOR, TRUSTEES [No. 69 (Adv.), September Term, 1973.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided July 20, 1973. *495 The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEV

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a). Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410(a), William E. Kleinsch-midt, is ordered to show cause within ten days of the date of this opinion, why this court should not impose sanctions, including prohibiting Mr. Kleinschmidt from filing further appeals and assessing fees and costs against him. The Appellee may respond within five d

HUFF, J. Lamont Antonio Samuel appeals his conviction for murder, arguing the trial judge erred in refusing to allow him to represent himself. We affirm. FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL HISTORY Samuel, who was indicted for the murder of Taneris Hamilton, was provided appointed counsel. Prior to trial, Samuel moved to represent himself. The trial judge conducted a hearing to consider the motion. Samuel

SALTER, J. Chase Home .Finance, LLC (“Chase”), appeals an order dismissing its mortgage foreclosure complaint without prejudice and an order denying rehearing following *1269 the dismissal. Finding that, Chase was prejudiced by differing rulings at and after a non-jury trial of the case (because

39 Wn.2d 826 (1951) 239 P.2d 327 DAVID H. SALTER et al., Respondents and Cross-appellants, v. RICHARD P. HEISER, Appellant.[1] No. 31779. The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One. December 27, 1951. DONWORTH, J. This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages to plaintiffs in an action based on fraudulent

SUAREZ, C.J. Eagle Arts Academy [“EAA”] appeals from a non-final order summarily denying its motion to dismiss the complaint against it by Tri-County Electric Company, Inc. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Although Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(xi) 1 authorize