Cases

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 3 Opinion Number: 4 Filing Date: November 6, 2014 5 NO. 34,128 6 SARA BENAVIDES, 7 Worker-Petitioner, 8 v. 9 EASTERN NEW MEXICO MEDICAL CENTER 10 and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 11 Employer/Insurer-Respondents. 12 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI 13 Gregory D. Griego Workers’ Compensation Judge 14 Gerald A. Hanrahan 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Petitioner 17 Hale & Dixon, P.C. 18 Timothy S. Hale

I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 09:07:21 2014.12.09 IN THE SUPREME COU

Reversed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Senior Judge MICHAEL, joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Frances Crutchfield and Henry Broaddus brought suit against the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the County of Hanover, Virginia to enjoin the construction

666 S.E.2d 527 (2008) POCAHONTAS MINING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY v. CNX GAS COMPANY, LLC GeoMet Operating Company, Inc. v. CNX Gas Company, LLC Record Nos. 071608, 071609. Supreme Court of Virginia. September 12, 2008. *528 Donald R. Johnson, Roanoke, for appellant, Pocahontas Mining Limited Liability Co. Greg

LIU, J., Concurring. As today’s opinion explains, there is an important difference between two kinds of smell-related claims. One is that the detection of a distinctive odor through a police officer’s sense of smell may establish probable cause that a closed container holds contraband. This proposition is well established. (See Johnson v. United States (1948) 333 U.S. 10, 13 [92 L.Ed. 436, 68 S.Ct. 367] [sme

643 S.E.2d 136 (2007) WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY, L.L.P., et al. v. PEOPLE FOR the ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC. Record Nos. 052376, 061195. Supreme Court of Virginia. April 20, 2007. *137 Thomas J. Cawley (Sona Rewari; Hunton & Williams, on briefs), McLean, for appellants. Philip J. Hirschkop (Bernard J. DiMuro; Jon

161 S.W.3d 176 (2005) Barbara Bell JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 06-04-00043-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted October 22, 2004. Decided March 3, 2005. *180 Clifton L. "Scrappy" Holmes, Holmes Law Office, PC, Longview, for appellant. Randal Lee, Criminal Dist. A

By Judge Clifford R. Weckstein *591[T]he doors of this courthouse are open to good faith litigation, but abuse of the judicial process, as in this case, will not be tolerated. Snyder v. Internal Revenue Serv., 596 F. Supp. 240, 252 (N.D. Ind. 1984) (paraphrasing Granzow v. Commissioner, 739 F.2d 2

325 F.3d 211 FRANCES BROADDUS CRUTCHFIELD; Henry Ruffin Broaddus, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.COUNTY OF HANOVER, VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellant, andUnited States Army Corps of Engineers, Defendant.Greater Richmond Partnership, Incorporated; Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce; Hanover Business Council; Local Government Attorneys of Virginia, Incorporated; Virginia Association of Counties; Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agen

Reversed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge CHASANOW and Judge DAVIS joined. OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Applying the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the district court entered an injunction, on the motion of 360° Communications, Inc., directing the Albemarle County (Virginia) Board of Supervisors to issue

Dissenting Opinion by BELL, Chief Judge. The “911 system” 1 is an emergency system intended by the General Assembly to enhance, in recognition of their paramount importance, the safety and well-being of the citizens of Maryland by ensuring that timely and appropriate assistance is rendered when the lives or property of those citizens ar

43 Cal.Rptr.3d 750 (2006) 38 Cal.4th 811 135 P.3d 3 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Daniel Lyon THOMPSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. S130174. Supreme Court of California. June 1, 2006. *752 Richard B. Lennon, Los Angeles, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defend

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams